The effect of stationary phase on lipophilicity determination of β-blockers using reverse-phase chromatographic systems

Biomedical Chromatography

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 725-736

  Welerowics, Tomasz ^a   Buszewski, Boguslaw ^a  

^a NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Cholesterol stationary phase; Lipophilicity; Monolithic stationary phase; Polar embedded stationary phases; QSRR; blockers

Indexed keywords

HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; METHANOL; PHASE STRUCTURE; SILICA GEL;

CHOLESTEROL STATIONARY PHASE; LIPOPHILICITY; LIPOPHILICITY DETERMINATION; MOBILE PHASIS; MONOLITHIC STATIONARY PHASIS; POLAR-EMBEDDED STATIONARY PHASE; QSRR; STATIONARY PHASE; Β-BLOCKER;

ACETONITRILE;

ACEBUTOLOL; ACETONITRILE; AMMONIUM ACETATE; ATENOLOL; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CARTEOLOL; ESMOLOL; METHANOL; MEXILETINE; NADOLOL; OXPRENOLOL; PINDOLOL; PROPAFENONE; PROPRANOLOL; SILICA GEL;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG STRUCTURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIPOPHILICITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METHODOLOGY; REVERSED PHASE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 29544433038     PISSN: 02693879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.507     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Al-Haj MA, Kaliszan R and Buszewski B. Quantitative structure-retention relationship with model analytes as a means of an objective evaluation of chromatographic columns. Journal of Chromatographic Science 2001; 39: 29.
2. Buszewski B, Jezierska M and Ostrowska-Gumkowska B. Silicon dioxide surface modified with cholesterol derivatives. Materials in Chemistry and Physics 2001; 72: 30.
3. Buszewski B and Welerowicz T. Stationary phases with special structural properties for high-throughput separation techniques: preparation, characterisation and applications. CC & HTS 2004; 7: 291.
4. Buszewski B, Jaroniec M and Gilpin RK. Influence of eluent composition on retention and selectivity of alkylamide phases under reverse-phase conditions. Journal of Chromatography A 1994; 668: 293.
5. Buszewski B, Gadzala-Kopciuch RM, Markuszewski M and Kaliszan R. Chemically bonded silica stationary phases: synthesis, physicochemical characterization and molecular mechanism of reverse phase HPLC retention. Analytical Chemistry 1997; 69: 3277.
6. Buszewski B, Jezierska M, Welniak M and Kaliszan R. Cholesteryl-silica stationary phase for liquid chromatography: Comparative study of retention behavior and selectivity. Journal of Chromatography A 1999; 845: 433.
7. Dill KA. The mechanism of solute retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1987; 91: 1980.
8. Donovan SF and Pescatore MC. Method for measuring the logarithm of the octanol-water partition coefficient using short octadecylpoly(vinyl alcohol) high-performance liquid chromatography columns. Journal of Chromatography A 2002; 952: 46.
9. Du CM, Valkó K, Bevan C, Reynolds D and Abraham MH. Rapid gradient RP-HPLC method for lipophilicity determination: a solvation equation based comparison with isocratic method. Analytical Chemistry 1998; 70: 4228.
10. Gulyaeva N, Zaslavsky A, Lechner P, Chlenov M, Chait A and Zaslavsky B. Relative hydrophobicity and lipophilicity of β-blockers and related compounds as measured by aqueous two-phase partitioning, octanol-buffer partitioning, and HPLC. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Science 2002; 17: 81.
11. Hansch C and Fujita T. p-σ-π analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical Structure. Journal of the American Chemistry Society 1964; 86: 616.
12. Hansch C and Leo A. Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology. Wiley: New York, 1979.
13. Jandera P and Churacek J. Gradient Elution in Column Liquid Chromatography. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985.
14. Jaroniec CP, Gilpin RK and Jaroniec M. Adsorption and thermogravimetric studies of silica-based amide bonded phases Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1997; 101: 6861.
15. Jinno K. A Computer Assisted Chromatography System. Huthing: Heidelberg, 1990.
16. Kaliszan R. Quantitative Structure-Chromatographic Retention Relationships. Wiley: New York, 1987.
17. Kaliszan R. Modeling of biological interactions by biochromatography and chemometrics. Pharmacological Research 1995a; 31: 316.
18. Kaliszan R. Quantitative structure-retention relationships and chromatographic determination of hydrophobicity. In Handbook of Advanced Materials Testing. Marcel Decker: New York, 1995b.
19. Kaliszan R, Nasal A and Markuszewski M. New approaches in chromatographic determination of lipophilicity of xenobiotics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2003; 377: 803.
20. Krass JD, Jastorff B and Genieser HG. Determination of lipophilicity by gradient elution high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytical Chemistry 1997; 69: 2571.
21. Nasal A, Sznitowska M, Bucinski A and Kaliszan R. Hydrophobicity parameter from high-performance liquid chromatography on an immobilized artificial membrane column and its relationship to bioactivity. Journal of Chromatography A 1995; 692: 83.
22. Nasal A, Siluk D and Kaliszan R. Chromatographic retention parameters in medicinal chemistry and molecular pharmacology. Current Medicinal Chemistry 2003; 10: 81.
23. Ong S, Liu H, Qiu X, Bhat G and Pidgeon Ch. Membrane partition coefficients chromatographically measured using immobilized artificial membrane surfaces. Analytical Chemistry 1995; 67(4): 755.
24. Pidgeon Ch and Venkataram UV. Immobilized artificial membrane chromatography: supports composed of membrane lipids. Analytical Biochemistry 1989; 176: 36.
25. Pidgeon C, Marcus C and Alvarec F. Applications of enzyme biotechnology, Baldwin TD and Kelly JW (eds). Plenum Press: New York, 1992.
26. Pidgeon Ch, Ong S, Choi H and Liu H. Preparation of mixed ligand immobilized artificial membranes for predicting drug binding to membranes. Analytical Chemistry 1994; 66: 2701.
27. Rekker RE. The Hydrophobicity Fragment Constant. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1976.
28. Schoenmakers PJ, Biliet HA, Galan H and De L. Influence of organic modifiers on retention behavior in reverse-phase liquid chromatography and its consequences for gradient elution. Journal of Chromatography 1979; 185: 179.
29. Snyder LR and Dolan JW. Initial experiments in high-performance liqiud chromatographic method development I. Use of starting gradient run. Journal of Chromatography A 1996, 721: 3.
30. Snyder LR, Dolan JW and Grant JR. Gradient clution in high-performance liquid chromatography II. Practical application to reverse phase system. Journal of Chromatography 1979; 165: 3.
31. Soczewinski E. Solvent composition effects in thin-layer chromatography systems of the type silica gel-electron donor solvent. Analytical Chemistry 1969; 41: 179.
32. Szumski M and Buszewski B. Study of bed homogenity of methacrylate-based monolithic columns for Micro-HPLC and CEC. Chromatografia 2004; 60(S1): 261.
33. Valkó K. Application of high-performance liqiud chromatography based measurements of lipophilicity to model biological distribution. Journal of Chromatography A 2004; 1037: 299.
34. Valkó K, Plass M, Bevan C, Reynolds D and Abraham MH. Relationships between the chromatographic hydrophobicity indices and solute descriptors obtained by using several reversed-phase, diol, nitrile, cyclodextrin and immobilised artificial membrane-bonded high-performance liquid chromatography columns. Journal of Chromatography A 1998; 797: 41.