Business segment performance redux: A multilevel approach

Strategic Management Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 45-61

  Hough, Jill R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

Author keywords

Business segment effects; Corporate effects; Industry effects; Multilevel analysis

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BUSINESS SEGMENT EFFECTS; CORPORATE EFFECTS; INDUSTRY EFFECTS; MULTILEVEL ANALYSIS;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 29444454014     PISSN: 01432095     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/smj.498     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Bowman EH, Helfat CE. 2001. Does corporate strategy matter? Strategic Management Journal 22(1): 1-23.
2. Brush TH, Bromiley P. 1997. What does a small corporate effect mean? A variance components simulation of corporate and business effects. Strategic Management Journal 18(10): 825-835.
3. Brush TH, Bromiley P, Hendrickx M. 1999. The relative influence of industry and corporation on business segment performance: an alternative estimate. Strategic Management Journal 20(6): 519-547.
4. Buffet W. 1999. Quote in Strategic Management: Concepts for Managers (2nd edn), Bourgeois LJ, Duhaime IM, Stimpert JL. Dryden Press: Fort Worth, TX; 81.
5. FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board). 1997. Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131. FASB: Norwalk, CT.
6. Goldstein H. 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models. Halsted Press: New York.
7. Hartley HO, Rao JNK, Lamotte L. 1978. A simple synthesis-based method of variance component estimation. Biometrics 34: 233-244.
8. Herrmann D, Thomas WB. 2000. An analysis of segment disclosures under SFAS no. 131 and SFAS no. 14. Accounting Horizons 14: 287-302.
9. Hofmann DA, Griffin MA, Gavin MB. 2000. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA; 467-511.
10. Hofmann DA, Stetzer A. 1998. The role of safety climate and communication in accident interpretation: implications for learning from negative events. Academy of Management Journal 41: 644-657.
11. Hough JR, White MA. 2003. Environmental dynamism and strategic decision-making rationality: an examination at the decision level. Strategic Management Journal 24(5): 481-489.
12. James LR. 1982. Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology 67: 219-229.
13. Kennedy P. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics (4th edn). MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
14. Kmenta J. 1971. Econometrics. Macmillan: New York.
15. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds). 2000. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
16. Kreft I, de Leeuw J. 1998. Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Sage: London.
17. Mauri AJ, Michaels MP. 1998. Firm and industry effects within strategic management: an empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal 19(3): 211-219.
18. McGahan AM, Porter ME. 1997. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 18: 15-30.
19. McGahan AM, Porter ME. 2002. What do we know about variance in accounting profitability? Management Science 48: 834-851.
20. Rasbash J, Goldstein H. 1994. Efficient analysis of mixed hierarchical and cross-classified random structures using a multilevel model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 19: 337-350.
21. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods (2nd edn). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
22. Roquebert JA, Phillips RL, Westfall PA. 1996. Markets vs. management: what drives profitability? Strategic Management Journal 17(8): 653-664.
23. Rousseau DM. 1985. Issues of level in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior 7: 1-37.
24. Ruefli TW, Wiggins RR. 2003. Industry, corporate, and segment effects and business performance: a non-parametric approach. Strategic Management Journal 24(9): 861-879.
25. Rumelt RP. 1991. How much does industry really matter? Strategic Management Journal 12(3): 167-185.
26. Schmalensee R. 1985. Do markets differ much? American Economic Review 75: 341-351.
27. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. Sage: London.
28. Street DL, Nichols NB, Gray SJ. 2000. Segment disclosures under SFAS no. 131: has business segment reporting improved? Accounting Horizons 14: 259-285.
29. Vancouver JB, Millsap RE, Peters PA. 1994. Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 666-679.
30. Wernerfelt B, Montgomery CA. 1988. Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance. American Economic Review 78: 246-250.
31. Whitener EM. 2001. Do 'high commitment' human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management 27: 515-536.