Effects of feedforward and feedback consistency on reading and spelling in dyslexia

Dyslexia

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 233-252

  Davies, Robert A I ^a   Weekes, Brendan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consistency; Dyslexic; Orthography; Phonology; Reading; Spelling

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYSLEXIA; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT; LINGUISTICS; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MENTAL TEST; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PHONETICS; READING; SCHOOL CHILD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION; WORD RECOGNITION; WRITING;

CHILD; DYSLEXIA; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHONETICS; READING;

EID: 29444436396     PISSN: 10769242     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dys.307     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. Barry, C., & Seymour, P. H. K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 5-40.
3. Brown, G. D. A., & Loosemore, R. P. W. (1994). Computational approaches to normal and impaired spelling. In G. D. A. Brown, & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention. Chichester, England: Wiley.
4. Bruck, M., & Waters, G. (1988). An analysis of the spelling errors of children who differ in their reading and spelling skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 77-92.
5. Buchanan, L., & Westbury, C. (2000). Wordmine database: Probablistic values for all four to seven letter words in the English language. http://www.wordmine.org
6. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751-774.
7. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
8. Coltheart, V., & Leahy, J. (1992). Children's and adult's reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 718-729.
9. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
10. Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (2003). Homophone interference effects in visual word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A(3), 403-420.
11. Frith, U., & Snowling, M. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 329-342.
12. Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of developmental dyslexia. In K.E. Patterson, J.C. Marshall & M. Coltheart (eds.), Surface dyslexia. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates pp 301-330.
13. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
14. Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.
15. Goswami, U. (1988). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. British Journal of Psychology, 6, 21-33.
16. Goswami, U. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443-475.
17. Grossberg, S., & Stone, G. O. (1986). Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning and resonance. Psychological Review, 93, 46-71.
18. Gum, T., & Bub, D. (1988). Psychlab software. Montreal, Canada: Montreal Neurological Institute.
19. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491-528.
20. Harrison, C. (1980). Readability in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Holligan, C., & Johnston, R. S. (1988). The use of phonological information by good and poor readers in memory and reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 16, 522-532.
22. Holmes, V. M., & Ng, E. (1993). Word-specific knowledge, word recognition strategies and spelling ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 230-257.
23. Houghton, G., & Zorzi, M. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a Connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20(2), 115-162.
24. Howard, D., & Best, W. (1996). Developmental phonological dyslexia: Real word reading can be completely normal. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 887-934.
25. Jacobs, A. M., & Grainger, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the Interactive Activation Model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
26. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
27. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
28. Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). Naming multi-syllabic words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
29. Kawamoto, A. H., & Zemblidge, J. H. (1992). Pronunciation of homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 349-374.
30. Kay, J., & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm and foot, or the body in question: Further discussion of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). London: Erlbaum.
31. Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592-617.
32. Kreiner, D. S. (1996). Effects of word familiarity and phoneme-grapheme polygraphy on oral spelling time and accuracy. The Psycholological Record, 46, 49-70.
33. Kreiner, D. S., & Gough, P. B. (1990). Two ideas about spelling: Rules and word specific memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 103-118.
34. Kuçera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
35. La Cruz, I., & Folk, J. (2002). Feedforward and feedback consistency effects in visual word recognition. Poster presented at the 42nd Annual meeting of the psychonomic society, Orlando.
36. Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 103-119.
37. Laxon, V., Masterson, J., & Coltheart, V. (1991). Some bodies are easier to read: The effect of consistency and regularity on children's reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 43A(4), 793-824.
38. Leslie, L., & Calhoon, A. (1995). Factors affecting children's reading of rimes: Reading ability, word frequency, and rime-neighbourhood size. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 576-586.
39. McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
41. Metsala, J. L., Stanovich, K. E., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). Regularity effects and the phonological deficit model of reading disabilities: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 279-293.
42. Monaghan, J., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). What interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(1), 183-206.
43. Paap, K., Newsome, S. L., McDonald, J. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
44. Peereman, R., Content, A., & Bonin, P. (1998). Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 151-174.
45. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145-174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Perry, C. (2003). A phoneme-grapheme feedback consistency effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(2), 392-397.
47. Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, L. D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139-156.
48. Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Reggia, L. D. (2002). Investigating the impact of feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 572-584.
49. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
50. Raajmakers, J. G., Schinemakers, J. M., & Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with 'The language as fixed effect fallacy': Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416-426.
51. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammy and double whammy: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 277-282.
52. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
53. Schonell, F., & Goodachre, E. (1971). The psychology and teaching of reading. London: Oliver and Boyd.
54. Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
55. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
56. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
57. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151-218.
58. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader. The phonological core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-612.
59. Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two way street: Feed-forward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337-359.
60. Stuart, M., & Masterson, J. (1992). Patterns of reading and spelling in 10-year-old children related to prereading phonological abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 168-187.
61. Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997a). Picture naming deficits in developmental dyslexia: The phonological representations hypothesis. Brain and Language, 56(3), 334-353.
62. Swan, D., & Goswami, U. (1997b). Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 18-41.
63. Szeszulski, P. A., & Manis, F. R. (1987). A comparison of word recognition processes in dyslexic and normal readers at two reading-age levels. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 44, 364-376.
64. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(6), 608-631.
65. Treiman, R., & Zukowski, A. (1988). Units in reading and spelling. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 466-477.
66. Treiman, R., Goswami, U., & Bruck, M. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 559-647.
67. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
68. Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 1269-1291.
69. Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
70. Venezky, R. L. (1970). The structure of English orthography. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
71. Waters, G. S., Bruck, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 511-530.
72. Waters, G. S., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory and Cognition, 13, 557-572.
73. Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & Bruck, M. (1984). Children's and adults use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks. Memory and Cognition, 12, 293-305.
74. Weekes, B. S., Davies, R. A., Parris, B. A., & Robinson, G. E. (2003). Age-of acquisition effects on spelling in surface dysgraphia. Aphasiology, 17, 563-584.
75. Ziegler, J. C., Montant, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997b). The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(4), 533-554.
76. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997a). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feed-forward and feedback consistency in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 29, 600-618.