Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the nucleus-22 cochlear implant

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 321-331

  Fu, Qian Jie ^a   Shannon, Robert V ^a  

^a HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; ELECTRODE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONEME; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH ANALYSIS; TONOTOPY; VOWEL;

ADULT; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032815684     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199908000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blamey, P. J., Pyman, B. C., Gordon, M., Clark, G. M., Brown, A. M., Dowell, R. C., & Hollow, R. D. (1992). Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 101, 342-348.
2. Bredberg, G., & Lindstrom, B. (1995). Insertion length of electrode array and its relation to speech communication performance and nonauditory side effects in multichannel-implanted patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Supplement 166, 256-258.
3. Brill, S., Gstöttner, W., Helms, J., v. Ilberg, C., Baumgartener, W., Müller, J., & Keifer, J. (1997). Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+. American Journal of Otology, 18(Suppl.), S104-S106.
4. Chatterjee, M., & Shannon, R. V. (1998). Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103, 2565-2572.
5. Dorman, M. F., Dankowski, K., McCandless, G., & Smith, L. M. (1989). Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 10, 288-291.
6. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., & Rainey, D. (1997a). Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion-depth on speech understanding. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2993-2996.
7. Dorman, M. F., Loizou, P. C., & Rainey, D. (1997b). Speech understanding as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 2403-2411.
8. Fishman, K., Shannon, R. V., & Slattery, W. H. (1997). Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 40, 1201-1215.
9. Fu, Q.-J., & Shannon, R. V. (1999). Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1889-1900.
10. Fu, Q.-J., Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., & Chatterjee, M. (1996). Electrode interaction measured by loudness summation in cochlear implant listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2631.
11. Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species - 29 years later. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 2592-2605.
12. Hanekom, J. J., & Shannon, R. V. (1998). Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2372-2384.
13. Hartrampf, R. Dahm, M. C., Battmer, R. D., Gnadeberg, D., Straus-Schier, A., Rost, U., & Lenarz, T. (1995). Insertion depth of the Nucleus electrode array and relative performance. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Supplement 166, 277-280.
14. Hill, F. J., McRae, L. P., & McClellan, R. P. (1968). Speech recognition as a function of channel capacity in a discrete set of channels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 13-18.
15. Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L., Clark, M., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3099-3111.
16. Holmes, A., Kemker, F. J., & Merwin, G. (1987). The effects of varying the number of cochlear implant electrodes on speech perception. American Journal of Otology, 8, 240-246.
17. Kileny, P., Zimmerman-Phillips, S., Zwolan T., & Kemink, J. (1992). Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the cochlear corporation multichannel implant. American Journal of Otology, 13, 117-123.
18. Kumakawa, K., Tadeka, H., & Ujita, N. (1997). Determining the optimum insertion length of electrodes in the Cochlear 22-channel implant: Results of a clinical study. Advance Otolaryngology, 52, 129-134.
19. Lawson, D., Wilson, B., & Finley, C. (1993). New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prostheses. In J. A. Allum, D. J. Allum-Mecklenburg, F. P. Harris, & R. Probst (Eds.), Natural and artificial control of hearing and balance (pp. 313-321), Progress in brain research, vol. 97. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
20. Marsh, M. A., Xu, J., Blarney, P. J., Whitford, L. A., Xu, S. A., Silverman, J. M., & Clark, G. M. (1993). Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. American Journal of Otology, 14, 386-391.
21. McDermott, H. J., McKay, C. M., & Vandali, A. E. (1992). A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited Multichannel cochlear implant. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 3367-3371.
22. Miller, G., & Nicely, P. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
23. Nagafuchi, M. (1976). Intelligibility of distorted speech sounds shifted in frequency and time in normal children. Audiology, 15, 326-337.
24. Rabinowitz, W. M., & Eddington, D. (1995). Effects of channel-to-electrode mappings on speech reception with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 16, 450-458.
25. Seligman, P. M., & McDermott, H. J. (1995). Architecture of the Spectra-22 speech processor. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 104, Supplement 166, 139-141.
26. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., & Wygonski, J. (1998). Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104, 2467-2476.
27. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F.-G., Wygonski, J., Kamath, V., & Ekelid, M. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
28. Skinner, M. W., Ketten, D. R., Vannier, M. W., Gates, G. A., Yoffie, R. L., & Kalander, W. A. (1994). Determination of the position of Nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. American Journal of Otology, 15, 644-651.
29. Van Tasell, D. J., Soli, S. D., Kirby, V. M., & Widin, G. P. (1987). Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 1152-1161.