Varieties of capitalism in an internationalized world: Domestic institutional change in European telecommunications

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 751-780

  Thatcher, Mark ^a,b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b Ctr for Anal of Risk/Regulation   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Historical institutionalism; Institutions; Internationalization; Telecommunications; Varieties of capitalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942659290     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004266868     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Albert, M. (1993). Capitalism against capitalism. London: Whurr.
2. Autorité de régulation des télécommunications. (1998). Rapport public d'activité. Paris: Author.
3. Autorité de régulation des télécommunications. (1999). Rapport public d'activité. Paris: Author.
4. Barroux, D. (1995, December 4). Fillon plaide pour l'alliance Phoenix à Washington. La Tribune desfossés, Retrieved from Dossiers de Presse, Bibliothèque de Sciences Po Paris.
5. Bennett, C.J. (1991). How states utilize foreign evidence. Journal of Public Policy, 11(1),31-54.
6. Berger, S., & Dore, R. (Eds.). (1996). National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Blandin-Obermesser, A. (1996). Le régime juridique communautaire des services des télécommunications. Paris: Masson/Armand Collin/CNET-ENST.
8. Boltho, A. (1997). Has France converged on Germany? Policies and institutions since 1958. In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism, (pp. 89-104). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9. Boyer, R. (1996). The convergence hypothesis revisited: Globalization but still the century of nations? In S. Berger & R. Dore (Eds.), National diversity and global capitalism, (pp. 29-59). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10. British Telecom. (1991). Serving telecommunications customers. London: Author.
11. Brivio, E. (1996, June 7). Bruxelles mette in riga l'Italia. II Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved from http://www.ilsole24ore.com/.
12. Cassese, S. (2000). La nuova costituzione economica. Rome: Laterza.
13. Cassese, S. (2001). L' arena pubblica: Nuovi paradigmi per lo state. Rivista Trimestrale di Diritto Pubblico, 3, 601-650.
14. Cavalli, M. (1995, February 6). L'Antitrust lascia I telefoni aziendali senza regolamenti. Il Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved from http://www.ilsole24ore.com/.
15. Cawson, A., Morgan, K., Webber, D., Holmes, P., & Stevens, A. (1990). Hostile brothers: Competition and closure in the European electronics industry. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
16. Chevallier, J. (1996). La nouvelle réforme des télécommunications: Ruptures et continuités. Revue Française de Droit Administratif, 12(5), 909-951.
17. Coen, D., Héritier, A., & Böllhoff, D. (2002). Regulating the utilities: Business and regulator perspectives in the UK and Germany. Berlin, Germany: Anglo-German Foundation.
18. Cohen, E. (1992). Le colbertisme "high tech." Paris: Hachette.
19. Cowhey P. F., & Aronson, J. (1993). Managing the world economy: The consequences of corporate alliances. New York: Council of Foreign Relations.
20. Crandall, R. W. (1991). After the breakup: U.S. telecommunications in a more competitive era. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
21. Crouch, C., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (1997). Political economy of modern capitalism: Mapping convergence and diversity. London: Sage.
22. Dandelot, M. (1993). Le secteur des télécommunications en France: Rapport au Ministre de l'industrie, des postes et télécommunications et du commerce extérieur. Paris: PTT Ministry.
23. Deeg, R., & Lütz, S. (2000). Internationalization and financial federalism. Comparative Political Studies, 33(3), 374-405.
24. Delebarre, M. (1997). Les enjeux d'avenir pour France Télécom. Paris: Ministre de l'Economie, des Finances et de l'Industrie.
25. Der Postminister findet für seine radikalen Liberalisierungspläne zunehmend Verbündete. (1995, May 4). Wirtschaftswoche. Retrieved from Bundestag Pressedokumentation.
26. Direction générale des postes et télécommunications. (1994). Quelle réglementation pour les télécommunications françaises? Paris: Author.
27. Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5-24.
28. Escande, P., & Marti, R. (1997). France Télécom en Bourse dès octobre. Les Echos, 9, 12.
29. Evangelista, M. (1997). Domestic structures and international change. In Michael Doyle & John Ikenberry (Eds.), New thinking in international relations theory (pp. 202-228). Boulder, CO: Westview.
30. Foreman-Peck, J., & Müller, J. (Eds.). (1988). European telecommunication organisation. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
31. France Telecom. (1995). Télé-communiquer demain: Quelles règles du jeu? Paris: Ministère délégué à la poste, aux télécommunications et à l'espace.
32. Frieden, J. A., & Rogowski, R. (1996). The impact of the international economy on national policies: An analytical overview. In Robert Keohane & Helen Milner (Eds.), Internationalization and domestic politics (pp. 25-47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. Garrett, G., & Lange, P. (1995). Internationalization, institutions and political change. International Organization, 49(4), 627-655.
34. Gassot, Y., Pouillot D., & Balcon, L. (2000). The merger and acquisition frenzy. Communications & Stratégies, 38, 159-196.
35. Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32(4), 881-912.
36. Graack, C. (1996). Telecom operators in the European Union: Internationalization strategies and network alliances. Telecommunications Policy, 20(5), 341-355.
37. Grande, E. (1989). Vom Monopol zum Wettbewerb? Die neokonservative Reform der Telekommunikation in Crossbritannien und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
38. Green Cowles, M., Caporaso, J., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
39. Hall, P. A. (1986). Governing the economy: The policies of state intervention in Britain and France. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
40. Hall, P. A. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001a). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1-68). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001b). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Hallerberg, M., & Basinger, S. (1998). Internationalization and changes in tax policy in OECD countries: The importance of domestic veto players. Comparative Political Studies, 31(3), 321-353.
44. Hancké, B. (2001). Revisiting the French model: Coordination and restructuring in French industry. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 307-334). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45. Hansen, R., & King, D. (2001). Eugenic ideas, political interests, and policy variance. World Politics, 53, 237-263.
46. Hayward, J.E.S. (Ed.). (1995). Industrial enterprise and European integration: From national to international champions in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. Hills, J. (1986). Deregulating telecoms: Competition and control in the United States, Japan and Britain. London: Frances Printer.
49. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. (Eds.). (1997). Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Humphreys, P. (1992). The politics of regulatory reform in German telecommunications. In K. Dyson (Ed.), The politics of German regulation (pp. 105-135). Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
51. Katzenstein, P. (1978). Between power and plenty: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52. Keohane, R. O., & Milner, H. V. (Eds.). (1996). Internationalization and domestic politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. King, D. S. (1992). The establishment of work-welfare programmes in the United States and Britain: Politics, ideas and institutions. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 217-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54. Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G., & Stephens J. D. (Eds.). (1999). Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55. Larcher, G. (1993). L'avenir du secteur des télécommunications (Rapport du Sénat No. 129). Paris: Sénat.
56. Larcher, G. (1996). L'avenir de France Télécom: Un défi national (Rapport du Sénat No. 260). Paris: Sénat.
57. Locatelli, F. (1996, May 11). Prodi sogna un asse STET. Il Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved from http://www.ilsole24ore.com/.
58. Locke, R. (1995). Remaking the Italian economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
59. Mansell, R. (1990). Telecommunications tariff policies: An uncertain consensus. In G. Locksley (Ed.), The single European market and the information and communication technologies (pp. 73-88). London: Belhaven.
60. Martino, C. (1996, June 6). STET, i primi frutti della riorganizzazione. II Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved from http://www.ilsole24ore.com/.
61. Monnot, C. (1993, July 21). Priorité à l'alliance allemande? Le Monde. Retrieved from Dossiers de Presse, Bibliothèque de Sciences Po Paris.
62. Monnot, C. (1995, September 10-11). François Henrot quitte France Télécom après huit jours de présidence virtuelle. Le Monde, 12.
63. Natalicchi, G. (2001). Wiring Europe: Reshaping the European telecommunications regime. Lanham, UK: Rowan & Littlefield.
64. Nexon, M. (1994, June 15). France Télécom noue sa grande alliance américaine. La Tribune de l'Expansion, 8.
65. Noam, E. (1992). Telecommunications in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Perez, R. (2002). Telecomunicazioni e concorrenza. Milan, Italy: Giuffré.
67. Petit, V. (1993, November 30). France Télécom: Bonn exige une privatisation substantielle. La Tribune Desfossés. Retrieved from Dossiers de Presse, Bibliothèque de Sciences Po Paris.
68. Petit, V. (1994, June 15). Des obstacles réglementaires et techniques à lever. La Tribune de l'Expansion, 8.
69. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
70. Pitt, D. (1980). The telecommunications function in the Post Office: A case study in bureaucratic adaption. Hampshire, UK: Saxon House.
71. Postminister soll nicht länger Schiedsrichter sein. (1992, November 7). Frankfurter Rundschau. Retrieved from Bundestag Pressdokumentation.
72. Pressions américaines pour une privatisation de France Télécom. (1995, July 22). Le Monde. Retrieved from Dossiers de Presse, Bibliothèque de Sciences Po Paris.
73. Prévot, H. (1989). Rapport de synthèse. Paris: PTE Ministry.
74. Prosperetti, L., & Cimatoribus, M. (1998). Telecommunications liberalisation trends in continental Europe. Communication & Stratégies, 31, 53-77.
75. Rendini, F. (1995, July 18). L'Italia anticipa Bruxelles. Il Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved from http://www.ilsole24ore.com/.
76. Rendini, F. (1995, August 5). Bloccate la Telecom per cinque anni. Il Sole 24 Ore. Retrieved from http://www.ilsole24ore.com/.
77. Rhodes, M., & van Apeldoorn, B. (1998). Capital unbound? The transformation of European corporate governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(3), 406-427.
78. Richeri, G. (1985). The difficulties involved in the control and organization of telecommunications in Italy. Media, Culture and Society, 7, 49-70.
79. Robischon, T. (1999). Telekommunikationspolitik im deutschen Einigungsprozess. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
80. Rose, R. (1993). Lesson-drawing in public policy: A guide to learning across time and space. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
81. Roulet, M. (1994). Rapport sur l'avenir du groupe France Télécom. Paris: Ministère de l'industrie, des télécommunications et du commerce extérieur.
82. Rueschemeyer, D. & Skocpol, T. (Eds.). (1996). States, social knowledge, and the origins of modern social policies. New York: Princeton University Press.
83. Sandholtz, W. (1998). The emergence of a supranational telecommunications regime. In W. Sandholtz & A. Stone Sweet (Eds.), European integration and supranational governance (pp. 134-163). New York: Oxford University Press.
84. Schmidt, S. (1991). Taking the long road to liberalization: Telecommunications reform in the Federal Republic of Germany. Telecommunications Policy, 15(3), 209-222.
85. Schmidt, S. (1997). Sterile debates and dubious generalisation: European integration theory tested by telecommunications and electricity. Journal of Public Policy, 16(3), 233-271.
86. Schmidt, V. A. (1996). From state to market? The transformation of French business and government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
87. Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The futures of European capitalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
88. Schneider, V. (2001a). Institutional reform in telecommunications: The European Union in transatlantic policy diffusion. In M. Green Cowles, J. Caporaso, & T. Risse (Eds.), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and domestic change (pp. 60-78). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
89. Schneider, V. (2001b). Die Transformation der Telekommunikation. Vom Staatsmonopol zum globalen Markt (1800-2000). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
90. Schneider, Volker, & Werle, Raymund. (1991). Policy networks in the German telecommunications domain. In B. Marin & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Policy network - Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations (pp. 97-136). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.
91. Stehmann, O. (1995). Network competition for European telecommunications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
92. Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W., & Fligstein, N. (Eds.). (2001). The institutionalization of Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
93. Telekom Fordert rasche Zuführung von Eigenkapital. (1992, September 26). Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Retrieved from Bundestag Pressdokumentation.
94. Thatcher, M. (1999). The politics of telecommunications: National institutions, convergence, and change in Britain and France. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
95. Thatcher, M. (2001). The commission and national governments as partners: EC regulatory expansion in telecommunications 1979-2000. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(4), 558-584.
96. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In The annual review of political science 1999 (pp. 369-404). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
97. Thorein, T. (1997). Telekommunikationspolitik in Deutschland- Liberalisierung und Regulierung. Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
98. Ungerer, H., & Costello, N. (1988). Telecommunications in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities.
99. Werle, R. (1990). Telekommunikation in der Bundesrepublik. Expansion, Differenzierung, Transformation. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.
100. Werle, R. (1999). Liberalisation of telecommunications in Germany. In K. A. Eliassen & M. Sjøvaag (Eds.), European telecommunications liberalisation (pp. 110-127). London: Routledge.
101. Wood, S. (2001). Business, government, and the patterns of labor market policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 247-274). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
102. Zahariadis, N. (1992). To sell or not to sell? Telecommunications policy in Britain and France. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 355-376.
103. Zysman, J. (1996). The myth of a "global" economy: Enduring national foundations and emerging regional realities. New Political Economy, 1(2), 157-184.