Teachers' task demands, students' test expectations, and actual test content

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 205-220

  Broekkamp, Hein ^a   Van Hout Wolters, Bernadette H A M ^a   Van Den Bergh, Huub ^a,b   Rijlaarsdam, Gert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; STUDENT; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 2942616952     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709904773839842     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Airasian, P. W. (1996). Classroom assessment. In E. De Corte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), International encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 809-813). Oxford: Elsevier.
2. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (1996). The role of importance and interest in processing of text. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 89-121.
3. Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., Kulikowich, J. M., & Woehler, C. A. (1994). Contrasting instructional and structural importance: The seductive effect of teacher questions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 19-47.
4. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 657-679). New York: Longman.
5. Bean, T. W. (1985). Classroom questioning strategies: Directions for applied research. In A. C. Graesser & J. B. Black (Eds.), The psychology of questions (pp. 335-358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Bol, L., & Strage, A. (1996). The contradiction between teachers' instructional goals and their assessment practices in high school biology courses. Science Education, 80, 145-164.
7. Broekkamp, H., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Van den Bergh, H. (2002). Importance in instructional text: Students' and teachers' perceptions of task demands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 260-271.
8. Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The art and science of classroom assessment: The missing part of pedagogy. Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher education reports.
9. Brown, A., & Smiley, S. S. (1977). Rating the importance of structural units of prose passages: A problem of metacognitive development. Child Development, 48, 1-8.
10. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
11. Dochy, F. J. R. C., & Moerkerke, G. (1997). Asessment as a major influence on learning and instruction. International Journal of Educational Research, 5, 415-431.
12. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159-199.
13. Fleming, M., & Chambers, B. (1983). Teacher-made tests: Windows on the classroom. In W. E. Hathaway (Ed.), New directions for testing and measurement: Vol. 19. Testing in the schools (pp. 29-38). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
15. Green, J. L., & Weade, R. (1987). In search of meaning: A sociolinguistic perspective on lesson construction and reading. In D. Bloome (Ed.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 3-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16. Jetton, T. L., & Alexander, P. A. (1997). Instructional importance: What teachers value and what students learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 290-309.
17. Miller, C. M. L., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London: Society for Research into Higher Education.
18. Multi Level Models Project (1999). ML-wiN, Beta version 1.10.0005. [Computer software]. Available from http://www.ioe.ac.uk
19. Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. (1990). Personal and environmental influences on students' beliefs about effective study strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 116-130.
20. Ramsden, P. (1988). Context and strategy - Situational influences on learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles. Perspectives on individual learning differences (pp. 159-184). New York: Plenum Press.
21. Reynolds, R. E. (1992). Selective attention and prose learning: Theoretical and empirical research. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 345-391.
22. Schellings, G. L. M., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1994). Selection of main points in texts by students: Three methods compared. In F. P. C. M. De Jong & B. H. A. M. Van Hout-Wolters (Eds.), Process-oriented instruction and learning from text (pp. 113-125). Amsterdam: Free University Press.
23. Schellings, G. L. M., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1995). Main points in an instructional text, as identified by students and by their teachers. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 742-757.
24. Schraw, G., Wade, S. E., & Kardash, C. A. M. (1993). Interactive effects of text-based and task-based importance on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 652-661.
25. Simpson, M. L., & Nist, S. L. (1997). Perspectives on learning history: A case study. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 363-395.
26. Snyder, B.R. (1971). The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Stodolsky, S. S., & Grossman, P. L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: An analysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 227-249.
28. Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer, W. D. (1986). Academic studying: The role of study strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 19-41.
29. Van Etten, S., Freebern, G., & Pressley, M. (1997). College students' beliefs about exam preparation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 192-112.
30. Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1990a). Selecting and cueing key phrases in instructional texts. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, S. N. Bennet & H. F. Friedrich (Eds.), Learning and Instruction - European research in an international context (Volume 2.2., pp. 181-198). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
31. Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1990b, November). Teachers' selection of key phrases in instructional texts. Paper presented at the 40th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference (NRC), Miami, USA.
32. Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (1997). Teachers' selection of key phrases in instructional texts. The School Field, 6, 51-62.
33. Wilson, M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89, 525-539.
34. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Winne, P. H., & Marx, R. W. (1982). Students' and teachers' views of thinking processes for classroom learning. Elementary School Journal, 82, 493-518. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.