Three looks at users: A comparison of methods for studying digital library use

Information Research

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2004, Pages

  Notess, Mark ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2942562366     PISSN: 13681613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Arms, W.Y. (2000) Digital libraries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bishop, A. (ed). (1995). How we do user-centered design and analysis for digital libraries: a methodological forum Paper delivered at the 37th Allerton Institute, Oct. 29-31, 1995, Graduate School of Library and Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/allerton/95.
3. Bishop, A.P., VanHouse, N.A., & Buttenfield, B.P., (Eds.) (2003). Digital library use: social practice in design and evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
5. Blandford, A. & Buchanan, G. (Eds.) (2002). JCDL'02 Workshop on Usability of Digital Libraries. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from University College London Interaction Centre Web site: http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/DLUsability/JCDL02.html.
6. Borgman, C. (2002). Final Report to National Science Foundation, Computer and Information Science Directorate, Information and Intelligent Systems Division, Digital Libraries Program on the Fourth DELOS Workshop. Evaluation of Digital Libraries: Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics Hungarian Academy of Sciences Computer and Automation Research Institute (MTA SZTAKI) Budapest, Hungary, 6-7 June 2002. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Computer and Automation Research Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Science Web site: http://www.sztaki.hu/conferences/deval/presentations/final_report.html
7. Chin, J.P., Diehl, V.A., & Norman, K. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In: E. Soloway, D. Frye, & S.B. Sheppard (Eds.), (pp. 213-218). Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Washington DC, May 1988. New York, NY: ACM Press.
8. Covey, D.T. (2002). Usage and usability assessment: library practices and concerns. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub105/pub105.pdf
9. Dunn, J.W., & Mayer, C.A. (1999) "VARIATIONS: A digital music library system at Indiana University." In: Rowe, N. & Fox, E.A. (Eds.) DL '99: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, Berkeley, CA, August 1999. (pp. 12-19). New York, NY: ACM Press.
10. Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA , (pp. 225-232). New York, NY: ACM Press.
11. Flanagan, J., Huang, T., Jones: , & Kasif, S., (Eds.) (1997). Human-centered systems: information, interactivity, and intelligence. Final report. Retrieved 31 March, 2004 from the Image Formation and Processing Group at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Web site: http://www.ifp.uiuc.edu/nsfhcs/final_report/toc.html
12. Fuhrman, M., Gauthier, D., & Dillon, A. (2001). Usability test of Variations and DML prototypes. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu/pdf/VariationsTest.pdf
13. Jones, S., Cunningham, S.J., McNab, R. & Boddie, S. (2000). A transaction log analysis of a digital library. International Journal of Digital Libraries, 3(2), 152-169.
14. Kuniavsky, M. (2003). Observing the user experience: a practitioner's guide to user research. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Lesk, M. (1997). Practical digital libraries. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
16. M531 Schubert listening assignment (2002). M531 Schubert listening assignment. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu/pilot/example-schubert.html.
17. Notess, M. & Swan, M.B. (2003). Predicting user satisfaction from subject satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA , (pp. 738-739). New York, NY: ACM Press.
18. Perlman, G. (n.d.) Web-based user interface evaluation with questionnaires. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from G. Perlman's personal Web site: http://www.acm.org/∼perlman/question.html
19. Swan, M. (2002a). Variations satisfaction survey results. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu/pdf/var-sat-survey.pdf.
20. Swan, M. (2002b). Variations2: IU digital music library first-round usability test report. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu/pdf/v2v1-early-test.pdf.
21. Swan, M. (2003) Variations2: IU digital music library version 1.0 usability test report. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu/pdf/v2v1-test.pdf
22. Swan, M., Notess, M. & Isaacson, E. (2002). MMTT prototypes usability testing first round report. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu/pdf/mmtt-usab-test-1.pdf
23. Variations2 (2003). Variations2: the Indiana University digital music library project. Retrieved 13 June, 2003 from the Variations 2 Digital Music Library Project, Indiana University Web site: http://variations2.indiana.edu
24. Wilson, T.D. (2002). 'Information science' and research methods. KniŽnicná a Informacná Veda, 19, 63-71. Retrieved 3 March, 2004 from http://informationr.net/tdw/publ/papers/slovak-02.html