Effects of predator-prey interactions and adaptive change on sustainable yield

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 175-184

  Matsuda, Hiroyuki ^a,c   Abrams, Peter A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISHING EFFORT; POPULATION SIZE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; SUSTAINABILITY; YIELD;

EID: 2942531209     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/f03-147     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abrams, P.A. 1984. Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. Am. Nat. 124: 80-96.
2. Abrams, P.A. 1991. The relationship between food availability and foraging effort: effects of life history and time-scale. Ecology, 72: 1242-1252.
3. Abrams, P.A. 2001. Modeling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter- and intra-specific competition: an assessment of three methods. Ecol. Lett. 4: 166-175.
4. Abrams, P.A. 2002. Will small population sizes warn us of impending extinctions? Am. Nat. 160: 293-305.
5. Abrams, P.A., and Matsuda, H. 1997. Prey evolution as a cause of predator-prey cycles. Evolution, 51: 1740-1748.
6. Abrams, P.A., and Rowe, L. 1996. The effects of predation on the age and size of maturity of prey. Evolution, 50: 1052-1061.
7. Abrams, P.A., and Walters, C.J. 1996. Invulnerable prey and the statics and dynamics of predator-prey interactions. Ecology, 77: 1125-1133.
8. Abrams, P.A., Namba, T., Mimura, M., and Roth, J.D. 1997. Comment on Abrams and Roth: the relationship between productivity and population densities in cycling predator-prey systems. Evol. Ecol. 11: 371-373.
9. Barange, M. (Editor). 2001. Report of the 1st meeting of the SPACC/IOC Study Group on "Use of environmental indices in the management of pelagic fish populations", 3-5 September 2001, Cape Town, South Africa. GLOBEC Spec. Contrib. No. 5.
10. Clark, C.W. 1990. Bioeconomic modelling and fisheries management. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
11. Collie, J.S., and Spencer, P.D. 1994. Modeling predator-prey dynamics in a fluctuating environment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51: 2665-2672.
12. Conover, D.O., and Munch, S.B. 2002. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science (Wash., D.C.), 297: 94-96.
13. FAO Fisheries Department. 1993. Reference points for fishery management: their potential application to straddling and highly migratory resources. FAO Fish. Circ. 864.
14. Heino, M., and Godø, O.R. 2002. Fisheries-induced selection pressures in the context of sustainable fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70: 639-656.
15. Katsukawa, T., and Matsuda, H. 2003. Simulated effects of target switching on yield and sustainability of fish stocks. Fish. Res. 60: 515-525.
16. Kendall, B.E., Predergast, J., and Bjørnstad, O. 1998. The macroecology of population dynamics: taxonomic and biogeographic patterns of population cycles. Ecol. Lett. 1: 160-164.
17. Köster, F.W., Möllmann, C., Neuenfeldt, S., St. John, M.A., Plikshs, M., and Voss, R. 2001. Developing Baltic cod recruitment models. I. Resolving spatial and temporal dynamics of spawning stock and recruitment for cod, herring, and sprat. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 1516-1533.
18. Lima, S.L. 1998. Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Adv. Stud. Behav. 27: 215-290.
19. Lima, S.L., and Dill, L.M. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
20. MacCall, A.D. 1976. Density dependence of catchability coefficient in the California sardine, Sardinops sagax caerula, purse seine fishery. Calif. Coop. Oceanic Fish. Invest. Rep. 18: 136-148.
21. Matsuda, H., and Abrams, P.A. 1994. Timid consumers: self-extinction due to adaptive change in foraging and anti-predator effort. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45: 76-91.
22. Matsuda, H., and Katsukawa, T. 2002. Fisheries management based on ecosystem dynamics and feedback control. Fish. Oceanogr. 11: 366-370.
23. Matsuda, H., and Namba, T. 1991. Food web graph of a co-evolutionarily stable community. Ecology, 72: 267-276.
24. Matsuda, H., Wada, T., Takeuchi, Y., and Matsumiya, Y. 1992. Model analysis of the effect of environmental fluctuation on the species replacement pattern of pelagic fishes under interspecific competition. Res. Popul. Ecol. 34: 309-319.
25. Merrick, R.L. 1997. Current and historical roles of apex predators in the Bering Sea ecosystem. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 22: 343-355.
26. Murdoch, W.W., and Oaten, A. 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9: 1-131.
27. Quinn, T.J., II, and DeRiso, R.B. 1999. Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Ricker, W.E. 1997. Cycles of abundance among Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 950-968.
29. Tanaka, S. 1980. A theoretical consideration on the management of a stock-fishery system by catch quota and on its dynamical properties. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 46: 1477-1482.
30. Walters, C.J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. Macmillan, New York.
31. Walters, C., and Kitchell, J.F. 2001. Cultivation/depensation effects on juvenile survival and recruitment: implications for the theory of fishing. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58: 39-50.
32. Walters, C., Pauly, D., Christensen, V., and Kitchell, J.F. 2000. Representing density dependent consequences of life history strategies in aquatic ecosystems: EcoSim II. Ecosystems, 3: 70-83.
33. Yodzis, P. 1988. The indeterminacy of ecological interaction as perceived through perturbation experiments. Ecology, 69: 508-515.
34. Yodzis, P. 2001. Must top predators be culled for the sake of fisheries? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 78-84.