Ranking ligand binding affinities with avidin: A molecular dynamics- based interaction energy study

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 69-81

  Wang, Jian ^a   Dixon, Richard ^a   Kollman, Peter A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biotin; Docking; Free energy calculations; Molecular dynamics

Indexed keywords

AVIDIN; BIOTIN; BIOTIN DERIVATIVE; LIGAND;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; ENERGY TRANSFER; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

AVIDIN; BENZAMIDINES; BINDING SITES; BIOTIN; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PRESSURE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; TRYPSIN; VACUUM;

EID: 0032910952     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19990101)34:1<69::AID-PROT6>3.0.CO;2-C     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kuntz ID, Meng EC, Shoichet BK. Structure-based molecular design. Accounts of Chem Res 1994;27:117-123.
2. Rosenfeld R, Vajda S, Delisi C. Flexible docking and design. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1995;24:677-700.
3. Böhm H-J. The computer program LUDI: a new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1992;6:61-78.
4. Williams DH. et al. Toward the semiquantitative estimation of binding constants. J Am Chem Soc 1991;113:7020-7030.
5. Head RD. et al. VALIDATE: A new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:3959-3969.
6. Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV. Empirical scoring functions .1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1997;11:425-445.
7. Ewing T, Kuntz ID. Critical evaluation of search algorithms for automated molecular docking and database screening. J Comp Chem 1997;18:1175-1189.
8. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 1997;267:727-748.
9. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 1996;261:470-489.
10. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Huey R, Olson AJ. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: parallel application of AutoDock 2.4. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1996;10:293-304.
11. Kollman PA. Free energy calculations: applications to chemical and biochemical phenomena. Chem Rev 1993;93:2395-2417.
12. Beveridge DL, Dicapua FM. Free energy via molecular simulations: Application to chemical and biochemical system. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1989;18:431-492.
13. van Gunsteren WF. Methods for calculation of free energies and binding constants: Success and problems. In: Gunsteren WFv, Weiner PK, editors. Computer simulation of biomolecular systems: theoretical and experimental applications. Netherlands: Escom Science Publishers; 1989. p. 27-59.
14. Åqvist J. Calculation of absolute binding free energies for charged ligands and effects of long-range electrostatic interactions. J Comp Chem 1996;17:1587-1597.
15. Åqvist J, Hansson T. On the validity of electrostatic linear response in polar solvents. J Phys Chem 1996;100:9512-9521.
16. Hansson T, Åqvist J. Estimation of binding free energies for hiv proteinase inhibitors by molecular dynamics simulations. Protein Eng. 1995;8:1137-1144.
17. Åqvist J, Medina C, Samuelsson JE. New method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. Protein Eng 1994;7:385-391.
18. Paulsen MD, Ornstein RL. Binding free energy calculations for P450cam-substrate complexes. Protein Eng 1996;9:567-571.
19. Jones-Hertzog DK, Jorgensen WL. Binding affinities for sulfonamide inhibitors with human thrombin using Monte Carlo simulations with a linear response method. J Med Chem 1997;40:1539-1549.
20. Heney G, Orr GA. The purification of avidin and its derivatives on 2-iminbiotin-6-aminohexylsepharose 4B. Anal Biochem 1981;114: 92-96.
21. Green NM. Avidin. Adv Protein Chem 1975;29:85-133.
22. Green NM. Avidin and Streptavidin. London: Academic Press; 1990. p. 51-67.
23. Wilchek M, Bayer EA. Avidin biotin technology 10 years on - Has it lived up to its expectations. Trends Biochem Sci 1989;14:408-412.
24. Livnah O, Bayer EA, Wilchek M, Sussman JL. 3-Dimensional structures of avidin and the avidin biotin complex. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1993;90:5076-5080.
25. Pugliese L, Coda A, Malcovati M, Bolognesi M. 3-Dimensional structure of the tetragonal crystal form of egg-white avidin in its functional complex with biotin at 2.7 angstrom resolution. J Mol Biol 1993;231:698-710.
26. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with Streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches. Proteins 1993;16:226-245.
27. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. What determines the strength of noncovalent association of ligands to proteins in aqueous solution? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;90:8402-8406.
28. Pearlman DA, et al. AMBER4.1. San Francisco: University of California; 1995.
29. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. TIP3P water model. J Chem Phys 1983;79:926-935.
30. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equation of motion of a system with constraint: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comp Phys 1977;23:327-341.
31. Wang W, Wang J, Kollman PA. What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations. Proteins, in press.