The amalgam-free dental school

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 371-377

  Roeters, F J M ^a   Opdam, N J M ^a   Loomans, B A C ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dental education; Dental school; Posterior composite resin

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; RESIN;

COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CURRICULUM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CLINIC; DENTIST; DENTISTRY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PHILOSOPHY; REVIEW; SCHOOL; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 2942517817     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Reeh E.S., Douglas W.H., Messer H.H. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. Journal of Endodontology. 15:1989;512-516
2. Walls A.W., Murray J.J., McCabe J.F. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A clinical trial comparing a minimal composite restoration with an occlusal amalgam restoration. British Dental Journal. 164:1988;288-292
3. Hosoda H., Fusayama T. A tooth substance saving restorative technique. International Dental Journal. 34:1984;1-12
4. Ausiello P., De Gee A.J., Rengo S., Davidson C.L. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored. American Journal of Dentistry. 10:1997;237-241
5. Hansen E.K., Asmussen E. In vivo fractures of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with enamel-bonded resin. Endodontics and Dental Traumatology. 6:1990;218-225
6. Wilson N.H.F., Mjör I.A. The teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools. Journal of Dentistry. 28:2000;15-21
7. Neuman K.A. Posterior esthetic dentistry - a perspective for the new century. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association. 10:1999;556-557
8. Simonsen R.J. The preventive resin restoration: a minimally invasive, nonmetallic restoration. Compendium. 8:1987;428-430
9. Opdam N.J.M., Roeters J.J.M., Peters T.C.R.B., Burgersdijk R.C.W., Teunis M. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive class I resin composite restorations. Dental Materials. 12:1996;230-235
10. Lussi A., Gygax M. Iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth during classical approximal box preparation. Journal of Dentistry. 26:1998;435-441
11. Medeiros V.A.F., Seddon R.P. Iatrogenic damage to approximal surfaces in contact with Class II restorations. Journal of Dentistry. 28:2000;103-110
12. Opdam N.J.M., Roeters J.J.M., Kuijs R., Burgersdijk R.C.W. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 80:1998;274-279
13. Opdam N.J.M., Roeters J.J.M., Van Berghem E., Eijsvogels E., Bronkhorst E.M. Microleakage and damage to adjacent teeth when finishing Class II adhesive preparations using either a sonic device or bur. American Journal of Dentistry. 15:2002;317-320
14. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Asscherickx K., Simon S., Abe Y., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts? Dental Materials. 17:2001;533-541
15. Opdam N.J.M., Loomans B.A.C., Roeters F.J.M., Bronkhorst E.M. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by students. Journal of Dentistry. 2004, this issue, doi:10.0116/j.dent.2004.02.005