Microleakage and damage to adjacent teeth when finishing Class II adhesive preparations using either a sonic device or bur

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 317-320

  Opdam, Niek J M ^a   Roeters, Joost J M ^a   Van Berghem, Edwin ^a   Eijsvogels, Edwin ^a   Bronkhorst, Ewald ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INJURY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH INJURY; ULTRASOUND;

BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; TOOTH INJURIES; ULTRASONICS;

EID: 0036823899     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kreulen CM, Amerongen van WE, Akerboom HBM, et al. Two-year results with box-only resin composite restorations. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:395-400.
2. Nordbø H, Leirskar J, Von der Fehr FR. Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in Class II carious lesions: Three-year results. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:155-159.
3. Strand GV, Nordbø H, Tveit AB, et al. A three-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sc 1996;104:384-389.
4. Do Amaral Zenkner JE, Baratieri LN, Monteiro S, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of cermet tunnel restorations on primary molars. Quintessence Int 1993;24:783-791.
5. Opdam NJM, Roeters JJM, Kuijs R, et al. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:274-279.
6. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in class II restorations: An in-vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994;25:781-785.
7. Lösche GM, Neuerburg CM , Roulet JF . Die adhäsive Versorgung konservativer Klasse II Kavitäten. Deutsch Zahn Zeitschr 1993;48:26-30.
8. Lussi A, Gygax M. Iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth during classical box-preparation. J Dent 1998;26:435-441
9. Medeiros VAF, Seddon RP. Iatrogenic damage to approximal surfaces in contact with Class II restorations. J Dent 2000;28:103-110.
10. Boer C, Frentzen M. Histologische Untersuchung des Kavitätenrandes nach Präparation mit dem SonicSys-System. ZWR 1999:108;582-589.
11. Wilson NHF Performance of Occlusin in butt-joint and bevel-edged preparations: Five year results. Dent Mater 1991;7:92-98.
12. Qvist V, Strøm C. 11-year assessment of class III resin restorations completed with two restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:253-262.
13. Prati C. Ten year's experience as basis for development of new posterior materials. In: Advanced adhesive dentistry: Cirimido, Kuraray, Italy, 2000, 267-285.
14. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of Clearfil Photo Posterior: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5:121-125.
15. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, et al. Marginal integrity and post-operative sensistivity in class II resin composite restorations in-vivo. J Dent 1998;26:555-562.