Iatrogenic damage to approximal surfaces in contact with Class II restorations

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 103-110

  Medeiros, V A F ^a   Seddon, R P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Approximal restorations; Iatrogenic damage; Replicas

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH INJURY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IATROGENIC DISEASE; MALE; PREVALENCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH INJURIES;

EID: 0034132644     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00061-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Moopnar M, Faulkner KDB. Accidental damage to teeth adjacent to crown-prepared abutment teeth. Australian Dental Journal 1991;36(2):136-40.
2. Qvist V, Johannassen L, Bruun M. Progression of approximal caries in relation to iatrogenic preparation damage. Journal of Dental Research 1992;71:1370-3.
3. Lussi A, Gygax M. Iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth during classical approximal box preparation. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:623-7.
4. Boyde A, Knight PJ. Scanning electron microscope studies of Class II cavity margins. British Dental Journal 1972;133:331-7.
5. Cardwell JE, Roberts BJ. Damage to adjacent teeth during cavity preparations. Journal of Dental Research 1972;51:1269-70.
6. Long TD. The effect of the morphology of adjacent tooth surface on amalgam and crown preparations. Journal of Dental Research 1980;59:1799.
7. Long TD, Smith BGN. The effect of contact area morphology on operative dental procedures. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 1988;15:593-8.
8. Seddon RP. The detection of cavitation in carious approximal surfaces in vivo by tooth separation, impression and scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Dentistry 1989;17:117-20.
9. Seddon RP. An investigation in the diagnosis and management of approximal caries using tooth separation and an impression technique, thesis, University of London, 1995.
10. Bandlish LK. Colour atlas of a new concept of enamel caries, Mitcham, Surrey, Avrohill Ltd, 1987. p. 64-7.
11. Radlanski RJ, Jäger A, Schwestka R, Bertzbach F. Plaque accumulations caused by interdental stripping. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics 1988;94:416-20.
12. Elderton RJ. Iatrogenesis in the treatment of dental caries. Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society 1992;88:25-32.
13. Elderton RJ, Nuttall NM. Variation among dentists in planning treatment. British Dental Journal 1983;154:201-6.
14. Kidd EAM, Smith BGN, Pickard HM. Pickard's manual of operative dentistry, 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. p. 112-32.
15. Bell BH, Grainger DA. Basic operative dentistry procedures, 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1971. p. 53-99.
16. Baratieri LN, De Andrada MACD, Júnior SM, Cardoso AC, Polidoro JS, De Andrada RC, De Sousa CN, Brandeburgo PC, Lins JRS. Advanced operative dentistry, 2. Chicago: Quintessence, 1993. p. 353-403.
17. Elderton RJ. New approaches to cavity design with special reference to the Class II lesion. British Dental Journal 1984;157:421-7.
18. Howard WW, Moller RC. Atlas of operative dentistry, 3. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 1981. p. 88-108.
19. Pitts NB, Longbottom C. Temporary tooth separation with special reference to the diagnosis and preventive management of equivocal approximal carious lesions. Quintessence International 1987;18:563-73.