Scene consistency and spatial presence increase the sensation of self-motion in virtual reality

Proceedings - APGV 2005: 2nd Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 111-118

  Riecke, Bernhard E ^a   Schulte Pelkum, Jörg ^a   Avraamides, Marios N ^b   Von Der Heyde, Markus ^c   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^c BAUHAUS UNIVERSITY WEIMAR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ego motion simulation; Human factors; Psychophysics; Spatial orientation; Spatial presence; Vection; Virtual Reality

Indexed keywords

EGO-MOTION SIMULATION; HUMAN FACTORS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; SPATIAL PRESENCE; VECTION;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; MOTION COMPENSATION; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 29344460655     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1080402.1080422     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. BECKER, W., RAAB, S., AND JÜRGENS, R. 2002. Circular vection during voluntary suppression of optokinetic reflex. Experimental Brain Research 144,4 (June), 554-557.
2. BRANDT, T., DICHGANS, J., AND KOENIG, E. 1973. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Experimental Brain Research 16, 476-491.
3. DICHOANS, J., AND BRANDT, T. 1978. Visual-vestibular interaction: Effects on selfmotion perception and postural control. In Perception, R. Held, H. W. Leibowitz, and H.-L. Teuber, Eds., vol. VIII of Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Springer, 756-804.
4. DISTLER, H. K. 2003. Wahrnehmung in Virtuellen Welten. PhD thesis, Justus-LiebigUniversität Gießen.
5. FISCHER. M. H., AND KORNMÜLLER, A. E. 1930. Optokinetisch ausgelöste Bewegungswahrnehmung und optokinetischer Nystagmus (Optokinetically induced motion perception and optokinetic nystagmus]. Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie, 273-308.
6. FUSHIKI, H., TAKATA, S., AND WATANABE, Y. 2000. Influence of fixation on circular vection. Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation 10, 3, 151-155.
7. HETTINGER, L. J. 2002. Illusory sell-motion in virtual environments. In Handbook of Virtual Environments, K. M. Stanney, Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, ch. 23, 471-492.
8. HOWARD, I. P., AND HECKMANN, T. 1989. Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of 2 competing visual-displays. Perception 18, 5, 657-665.
9. HOWARD, I. P., AND HOWARD, A. 1994. Vection - the contributions of absolute and relative visual motion. Perception 23, 7, 745-751.
10. KENNEDY, R. S., LANE, N. E., LILIENTHAL, M. O., BERBAUM, K. S., AND LAWRENCE. 1992. Profile analysis of simulator sickness symptoms: Application to virtual environment systems. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environment l, 3, 295-301.
11. LARSSON. P., VÄSTFJÄLL, D., AND KLEINER, M. 2004. Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory virtual environments. In Proceedings of Seventh Annual Workshop Presence 2004, 252-258. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/ publication.html?publs2953.
12. LEPECQ, J. C., JOUEN, F., AND DUBON, D. 1993. The effect of linear vection on manual aiming at memorized directions of stationary targets. Perception 22, 1, 49-60.
13. LEPECQ, J. C., GIANNOPULU, L. AND BAUDONNIERE, P. M. 1995. Cognitive effects on visually induced body motion in children. Perception 24, 4, 435-449.
14. NAKAMURA, S., AND SHIMOJO, S. 1999. Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection). Perception 28, 7, 893-902.
15. OHMI, M., HOWARD, I.P., AND LANDOLT, J. P. 1987. Circular vection as a function of foreground-background relationships. Perception 16, 1, 17-22.
16. PALMISANO, S., AND CHAN, A. Y. C. 2004. Jitter and size effects on vection are immune to experimental instructions and demands. Perception 33, 8, 987-1000.
17. PROTHERO, J. D. 1998. The Role of Rest Frames in Vection, Presence and Motion Sickness. PhD thesis, University of Washington. Available: www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-98-11/.
18. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., AVRAAMIDES, M. N., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2004. Enhancing the visually induced self-motion illusion (vection) under natural viewing conditions in virtual reality. In Proceedings of Seventh Annual Workshop Presence 2004, 125-132. Available: www.kyb.mpg.de/publication.html? publ=2864.
19. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., CANIARD, F., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2005. Influence of Auditory Cues on the visually-induced Self-Motion Illusion (Circular Vection) in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of Eigth Annual Workshop Presence 2005. (submitted).
20. RIECKE, B. E., SCHULTE-PELKUM, J., CANIARD, F., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2005. Towards lean and elegant self-motion simulation in virtual reality. In Proceedings of IEEE VR2005, 131-138. www.vr2005.org.
21. RIECKE, B. E., VÄSTFJÄLL, D., LARSSON, P., AND SCHULTE-PELKUM, J. 2005. Top-down and multi-modal influences on self-motion perception in virtual reality. In HCl international 2005 (accepted). www.hci-international. org.
22. SCHUBERT, T., FRIEDMANN, F., AND REGENBRECHT, H. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10, 3, 266-281.
23. WANN, J., AND RUSHTON, S. 1994. The illusion of self-motion in virtual-reality environments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17, 2 (June), 338-340.
24. WITMER, B. G., AND SINGER, M. J. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments; A presence questionnaire. Presence - Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3, 225-240.
25. ZACHARIAS. G. L., AND YOUNG, L. R. 1981. Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation. Experimental Brain Research 41, 159-171.