Critical role of foreground stimuli in perceiving visually induced self-motion (vection)

Perception

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 893-902

  Nakamura, Shinji ^a   Shimojo, Shinsuke ^b  

^a TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; KINESTHESIA; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST;

ADULT; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 0033256544     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p2939     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Koenig E, 1973 "Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception" Experimental Brain Research 16 476-491
2. Brandt T, Wist E R, Dichgans J, 1975 "Foreground and background in dynamic spatial orientation" Perception & Psychophysics 17 497-503
3. Delmore A, Martin C, 1986 "Roles of retinal periphery and depth periphery in linear vection and visual control of standing in humans" Canadian Journal of Psychology 40 176-187
4. Dichgans J, Brandt T, 1978 "Visual - vestibular interaction: Effects on self-motion perception and postural control", in Handbook of Sensory Physiology volume 8, Eds R Held, H W Leibowitz, H-L Teuber (New York: Springer) pp 755-804
5. Fischer M H, Kornmüller A E, 1930 "Optokinetisch ausgelöste Bewegungswahrnehmungen und optokinetischer Nystagmus" Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie (Leipzig) 41 273-308
6. Gibson J J, 1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin)
7. Heckman T, Howard I P, 1991 "Induced motion: Isolation and dissociation of egocentric and vection-entrained components" Perception 20 285-305
8. Howard I P, 1982 Human Visual Orientation (Chichester, Sussex: John Wiley)
9. Howard I P, Heckman T, 1989 "Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays" Perception 18 657-665
10. Howard I P, Howard A, 1994 "Vection: the contributions of absolute and relative visual motion" Perception 23 745-751
11. Johnson C A, Scobey R P, 1982 "Effects of reference lines on displacement thresholds at various durations of movement" Vision Research 22 819-821
12. Lee D N, Lishman J R, 1975 "Visual proprioceptive control of stance" Journal of Human Movement Studies 1 87-95
13. Nakamura S, Shimojo S, 1998a "Stimulus size and eccentricity in visually induced perception of horizontally translational self-motion" Perceptual and Motor Skills 87 659-663
14. Nakamura S, Shimojo S, 1988b "Orientation of selective effects of body tilt on visually induced perception of self-motion" Perceptual and Motor Skills 87 667-672
15. Ohmi M, Howard I P, 1988 "Effect of stationary objects on illusory forward self-motion induced by a looming display" Perception 17 5-12
16. Ohmi M, Howard I P, Landolt J P, 1987 "Circular vection as a function of foreground - background relationships" Perception 16 17-22
17. Previc F H, Kenyon R, Boer E R, Johnson B H, 1993 "The effects of background visual roll stimulation on postural and manual control and self-motion perception" Perception & Psychophysics 54 93-107
18. Rogers B, Graham M, 1979 "Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception" Perception 8 125-134
19. Snowden R J, 1992 "Sensitivity to relative and absolute motion" Perception 21 563-568
20. Telford L, Spratley J, Frost B J, 1992 "Linear vection in the central visual field facilitated by kinetic depth cues" Perception 21 337-349
21. Warren W H, 1995 "Self-Motion: Visual perception and visual control", in Perception of Space and Motion Eds W Epstein, S Rogers (San Diego, CA: Academic Press) pp 263-325