Renormalization group approach to interacting fermion systems in the two-particle-irreducible formalism

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 319-338

  Dupuis, N ^a,b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; FUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PHASE TRANSITIONS; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS; THERMODYNAMICS;

FERMION SYSTEMS; GINZBURG-LANDAU EXPANSION; LUTTINGER-WARD FUNCTIONALS; RENORMALIZATION GROUP (RG);

FERMIONS;

EID: 29344450240     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: 14346036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00409-7     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. J.M. Luttinger, J.C. Ward, Phys. Rev. 118, 1417 (1960)
2. G. Baym, L.P. Kadanoff, Phys. Rev. 124, 287 (1961)
3. G. Baym, Phys. Rev. 127, 1391 (1962)
4. G. De Dominicis, P.C. Martin, J. Math. Phys. 5, 14 and 31 (1964)
5. The 2PI formalism has been generalized to relativistic field theories by J. M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw, E. Tomboulis, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2428 (1974)
6. In bosonic systems, the functional Γ depends also on the expectation value of the bosonic field
7. Φ-derivable approximations satisfy conservation laws and Ward identities in fermion systems [3]. More generally, expectation values of the Noether currents corresponding to global symmetries are conserved, but Ward identities for the self-energy and higher-order vertex functions can be violated, e.g. in bosonic systems with broken gauge invariance (see Ref. [48])
8. N.E. Bickers, D.J. Scalapino, S.R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989)
9. N.E. Bickers, D.J. Scalapino, Annals of Physics 193, 206 (1989)
10. Y. Vilk, A.-M.S. Tremblay, J. Phys. I 7, 1309 (1997)
11. C. Wetterich, e-print arXiv: cond-mat/0208361
12. c superconductivity, edited by B. Douçot, J. Zinn-Justin (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1995), p. 307
13. R. Duprat, C. Bourbonnais, Eur. Phys. J. B 21, 219 (2001)
14. C. Bourbonnais, R. Duprat, J. Phys. IV France 114, 3 (2004)
15. J.C. Nickel, R. Duprat, C. Bourbonnais, N. Dupuis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 247001 (2005)
16. J.C. Nickel, R. Duprat, C. Bourbonnais, N. Dupuis, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0510744
17. Y. Fuseya, Y. Suzumura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 74, 1264 (2005)
18. G. Abramovici, J.C. Nickel, M. Heritier, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045120 (2005)
19. K.-M. Tarn, S.-W. Tsai, D.K. Campbell, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0505396
20. D. Zanchi, H.J. Schulz, Europhys. Lett. 44, 235 (1998)
21. D. Zanchi, H.J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13609 (2000)
22. C.J. Halboth, W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7364 (2000)
23. C. Honerkamp, M. Salmhofer, N. Furukawa, T.M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 63, 035109 (2001)
24. C. Honerkamp, M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. B 64, 184516 (2001)
25. M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 1 (2001)
26. C. Honerkamp, M. Salmhofer, T.M. Rice, Eur. Phys. J. B 27, 127 (2002)
27. C. Honerkamp, D. Rohe, S. Andergassen, T. Enss, Phys. Rev. B 70, 235115 (2004)
28. M. Salmhofer, C. Honerkamp, W. Metzner, O. Lauscher, Prog. Theor. Phys. 112, 943 (2005)
29. P. Kopietz, T. Busche, Phys. Rev. B 64, 155101 (2001)
30. T. Busche, L. Bartosch, P. Kopietz, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 14, 8513 (2002)
31. S. Ledowski, P. Kopietz, J. Phys.: Cond. Matt. 15, 4779 (2003)
32. F. Schütz, L. Bartosch, P. Kopietz, Phys. Rev. B 72, 035107 (2005)
33. B. Binz, D. Baeriswyl, B. Douçot, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 69 (2002)
34. B. Binz, D. Baeriswyl, B. Douçot, Ann. Phys. 12, 704 (2003)
35. A.A. Katanin, A.P. Kampf, Phys. Rev. B 68, 195101 (2003)
36. A.A. Katanin, A.P. Kampf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 106406 (2004)
37. A. Schwenk, B. Friman, G.E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A 713, 191 (2003)
38. T. Baier, E. Bick, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. B 70, 125111 (2004)
39. T. Baier, E. Bick, C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B 605, 144 (2005)
40. H. Freire, E. Corrêa, A. Ferraz, Phys. Rev. B 71, 165113 (2005)
41. The 1PI RG scheme was first introduced in quantum field theory and statistical physics. For a review, see J. Berges, N. Tetradis, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rep. 363, 223 (1993)
42. Y. Fuseya, H. Kohno, K. Miyake, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 74, 722 (2005)
43. W. Metzner, J. Reiss, D. Rohe, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0509412
44. T.M. Morris, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9, 2411 (1994)
45. R. Shankar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 129 (1994)
46. H. Van Hees, J. Knoll, Phys. Rev. D 65, 105005 (2002)
47. H. Van Hees, J. Knoll, Phys. Rev. D 65, 025010 (2002)
48. H. Van Hees, J. Knoll, Phys. Rev. D 66, 025028 (2002)
49. J.P. Blaizot, E. Iancu, U. Reinosa, Nucl. Phys. A 736, 149 (2004)
50. γ1γ2 where I is the unit matrix defined in equation (12)
51. R. Haussmann, Self-consistent quantum field theory and bosonization for strongly correlated electron systems (Springer, New York, 1999)
52. Note that our derivation of the universality of the LW functional is non perturbative as it does not rely on any diagrammatic expansion. For a related discussion, see M. Potthoff, e-print arXiv:cond-mat/0406671
53. The functional F[Σ] and Γ[Σ] have been introduced in the context of the self-energy functional approach by M. Potthoff, Eur. Phys. J. B 32, 429 (2003)
54. Λ|Δ. The same trick is used to calculate the ground state condensation energy in Section 3.2.1
55. P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 112, 1900 (1958)
56. N.N. Bogoliubov, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 41 and 51 (1958)
57. N. Dupuis, unpublished
58. A pairing instability in a high angular momentum channel can occur when the normal phase remains stable down to extremely low temperatures (Kohn-Luttinger effect). Such an instability would however not be experimentally observable
59. T. Vuletic, P. Auban-Senzier, C. Pasquier, S. Tomic, D. Jérome, M. Héritier, K. Bechgaard, Eur. Phys. J. B 25, 319 (2002)
60. I.J. Lee, S.E. Brown, W. Yu, M.J. Naughton, P.M. Chaikin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 197001 (2005)
61. J.P. Pouget, S. Ravy, J. Phys. I France 6, 1501 (1996)
62. S. Kagoshima, Y. Saso, M. Maesato, R. Kondo, T. Hasegawa, Sol. State. Comm. 110, 479 (1999)
63. N. Dupuis, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 14, 379 (2000)
64. A.A. Katanin, Phys. Rev. B 70, 115109 (2004)