How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics?

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 53-79

  Huth, Thorsten ^a   Taleghani Nikazm, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29244446806     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1362168806lr184oa     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J., editors, 1984: Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.
2. Auer, P. 2000: Pre- and post positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Kortmann, B., editors, Cause-condition-concession-contrast: cognitive and discourse perspectives, Mouton de Gruyter, 173-204.
3. Austin, J. 1962: How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
4. Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1996: Pragmatics and language teaching: Bringing pragmatics and pedagogy together. Pragmatics and Language Learning 7: 21-39.
5. Bardovi-Harlig, K. 1999: Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: a research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning 49(4): 677-713.
6. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Dörnyei, Z. 1999: Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: a research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning 49 (4): 677-713.
7. Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. 1990: Congruence in native and nonnative conversations: status balance in the academic advising session. Language Learning 40: 467-501.
8. Barraja-Rohan, A.-M. 1997: Teaching conversation and sociocultural norms with conversation analysis. In Liddicoat, A.J. and Crozet, C., editors, Teaching language, teaching culture, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S, 14: 71-88.
9. Crozet, C. and Liddicoat, A.J. 1997: Teaching culture as an integrated part of language teaching: an introduction. In Crozet, C. and Liddicoat, A.J., editors, Teaching language, teaching culture, Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Series S, 14: 71-88.
10. Crystal, D. 1997: The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge University Press.
11. Davidson, J. 1984: Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J., editors, Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis, Cambridge University Press, 102-28.
12. Egbert, M. 1996: Context-sensitivity in conversation: eye gaze and the German repair initiator bitte? Language in Society 25(4): 587-612.
13. Egbert, M. 1997: Some interactional achievements of other-initiated repair in multiperson conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 611-34.
14. Eisenstein, M. and Bodman, J. 1986: 'I very appreciate': expressions of gratitude by native and nonnative speakers of American English. Applied Linguistics 7: 167-85.
15. Eisenstein, M. and Bodman, J. 1993: Expressing gratitude in American English. In Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S., editors, Interlanguage pragmatics, Oxford University Press, 64-81.
16. Ellis, R. 2003: Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Ford, C.E. and Mori, J. 1994: Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: a cross-lingustic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4(1): 31-61.
18. Fox, B.A., Hayashi, M. and Jasperson, R. 1996: Resources and repair: a cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A. and Thompson, S., editors, Interaction and grammar, Cambridge University Press, 185-237.
19. Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
20. Godard, D. 1977: Same setting, different norms: phone call beginnings in France and the United States. Language in Society 6: 209-19.
21. Golato, A. 2002: German compliment responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 547-71.
22. Golato, A. 2003: Studying compliment responses: a comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics 24(1): 90-121.
23. Golato, A. 2005: Compliments and compliment responses: grammatical design and sequential organization. John Benjamins.
24. Gumperz, J.J. 1977: Language and social identity. Cambridge University Press.
25. Gumperz, J.J. 1982: Discourse strategies. Cambridge University Press.
26. Gumperz, J.J. 1992: Contextualization and understanding. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C., editors, Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon, Cambridge University Press, 229-52.
27. Günthner, S. 1996: From subordination to coordination? Verb-second position in German clausal and concessive constructions. Pragmatics 6(3): 323-56.
28. Günthner, S. 1999: Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 11: 34.
29. Han, C. 1992: A comparative study of compliment responses: Korean females in Korean interactions and in English interactions. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 8: 17-31.
30. Hayashi, M. 1999: When grammer and interaction meet. A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22: 475-99.
31. Hayashi, M. 2003: Joint utterances construction in Japanese conversation. John Benjamins.
32. Hayashi, M., Mori, J. and Takagi, T. 2002: Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation: an analysis of talk, gaze, and gesture. In Ford, C.E., Fox, B.A. and Thompson, S.A., editors, The language of turn and sequence, Oxford University Press.
33. Heritage, J. 1984: Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
34. Hopper, R. 1992: Telephone conversations. Indiana University Press.
35. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. 1991: Opening sequences in Dutch telephone conversations. In Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D.H., editors, Talk and social structure. University of California Press, 232-51.
36. Huth, T. 2005: Talking perspective: conversation analysis and culture in the German foreign language classroom. PhD thesis, University of Kansas.
37. Jaworski, A. 1994: Pragmatic failure in a second language: greeting responses in English by Polish students. IRAL 32(1): 41-55.
38. Jefferson, G. 1984: Transcription notation. In Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J., editors, Structures of social action, Cambridge University Press, ix-xvi.
39. Kasper, G. 1992: Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research. 8: 201-31.
40. Kasper, G. 1997: The role of pragmatics in language teaching education. In Bardovi-Harlig, K., editor, Beyond methods: components of second language education. McGraw Hill: 113-36.
41. Kasper, G. 2005: Speech acts in interaction: towards discursive pragmatics. Paper presented at the 16th international conference on pragmatics and language learning, Bloomington, IN.
42. Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S., editors, 1993: Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
43. Kasper, G. and Dahl, M. 1991: Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 215-47.
44. Kasper, G. and Rose, K.R. 2002: Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.
45. Kasper, G. and Schmidt, R. 1996: Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 149-69.
46. Lee, F.J. 2000: Tasks and communicating in language classrooms. McGraw Hill.
47. Lee, F.J. and VanPatten, B. 2003: Making communicative language teaching happen. McGraw-Hill.
48. Leech, G.N. 1983: Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
49. Levinson, S. 1983: Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
50. Liefländer-Koistinen, L. and Neuendorf, D. 1991: Auskunft erbitten. Telefongespräche im Deutschen und Finnischen: Unterschiede in ihrer interaktionalen Struktur. [Telephone conversations in German and Finnish: differences in their interactional structure]. Akten des VIII. Internationalen Germanisten Kongresses, Tokyo 1990, Volume 4: 482-94.
51. Lindström, A. 1990: Identification and recognition in Swedish telephone conversation openings. Language in Society 23: 231-52.
52. Markee, N. and Kasper, G. 2004: Classroom talks: an introduction. Modern Language Journal 88: 491-500.
53. Moerman, M. 1988: Talking culture. Ethnography and conversation analysis. University of Pennsylvania Press.
54. Mondana, L. and Pekarek-Doehler, S. 2004: Second language acquisition as situated practice: task accompishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 88: 501-18.
55. Pavlidou, T. 1994: Contrasting German-Greek politeness and the consequences. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 487-511.
56. Rose, K.R. and Kasper, G. 2001: Pragmatics in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
57. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. 1974: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696-735.
58. Schegloff, E.A. 1979: Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In Psathas, G., editor, Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology, Irvington, 23-78.
59. Schegloff, E.A. 1981: Discourse as an interactional achievement: some uses of 'uh huh' and other things that come between sentences. Paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1981, Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Washington, DC.
60. Schegloff, E.A. 1986: The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9(2/3): 111-51.
61. Schegloff, E.A. 1987: Between micro and macro: contexts and other connections. The micro-macro link. In Alexandro, J.C., Giesen, B., Münch R. and Smelser, N.J., editors, The micro-macro link, University of California Press, 207-34.
62. Schegloff, E.A. 1993: Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26(1): 99-128.
63. Schegloff, E.A. 1995: Sequence organization. Unpublished manuscript.
64. Schegloff, E.A. and Sacks, H. 1973: Opening up closings. Semiotica 8(4): 289-327.
65. Schieffelin, B.B. and Ochs, E. 1986: Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge University Press.
66. Schuetz, H. 2001: On causal clause combining: the case of 'weil' in spoken German. In Selting, M. and Couper-Kuhlen, E., editors, Studies in interactional linguistics, John Benjamins, 111-40.
67. Scotton, C.M. and Bernstein, J. 1988: Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics 9: 372-84.
68. Searle, J.R. 1969: Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
69. Seedhouse, P. 2004: Conversation analysis, applied linguistics, and second language acquisition. Language Learning 54: 223-62.
70. Sifianou, M. 1989: On the telephone again! Differences in telephone behavior: England versus Greece. Language in Society 18: 527-44.
71. Sorjonen, M. 2001a: Responding in conversation: a study of response particles in Finnish. John Benjamins.
72. Sorjonen, M. 2001b: Simple answers to polar questions: The case of Finnish. In Seltig, M. and Couper-Kuhlen, E., editors, Studies in interactional linguistics, John Benjamins, 405-31.
73. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. 1999: Politeness in native/nonnative speaker interaction: some manifestations of Persian Taarof in the interaction among Iranian speakers of German with German native speakers. PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
74. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. 2002a: A conversation analytical study of telephone conversation openings between native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1807-32.
75. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. 2002b: Persian telephone openings. In Pavlidou, T.-S. and Luke, K.K., editors, Telephone calls: unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures, John Benjamins.
76. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. In press: Request sequences: the intersection of grammar, interaction and social context. John Benjamins.
77. Tateyama, Y. 2001: Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routine: Japanese sumimasen. In Kasper, G. and Rose, K., editors, Pragmatics in language teaching, Cambridge University Press, 200-22.
78. Thomas, J. 1983: Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4(2): 91-112.
79. Wong, J. 2002: 'Applying' conversation analysis in applied linguistics: evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40(1): 37-60.
80. Young, R.F. and Miller, E.M. 2004: Learning as changing participation: discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal 88: 519-35.