Leading for innovation - An empirical investigation;Innovationsförderliche führung - Eine empirische analyse

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie

Volumn 213, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 61-76

  Krause, Diana E ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Expert knowledge; Freedom; Idea generation; Implementation; Inclination to innovate; Influence; Innovation; Leadership

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144527401     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0044-3409.213.2.61     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
2. Anderson, N. R. & King, N. (1993). Innovations in organizations. In C. I. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1-33). Chichester: Wiley.
3. Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M. & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
4. Axtell, C. M., Holman, D. J., Unsworth, K. L. Wall, T. D., Waterson, P. E. & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265-285.
5. rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
6. Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42, 693-716.
7. Fiol, C. M. (1996). Squeezing harder doesn't always work: Continuing the search for consistency in innovation research. Academy of Management Review, 21 (4), 1012-1021.
8. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incidents technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
9. Fleishman, E. A. (1973). Twenty years of consideration and structure. In E. A. Fleishman & J. G. Hunt (Eds.), Current developments in the study of leadership (pp. 1-37). Carbondale & Edwardsville: South Illinois University Press.
10. Frost, D. E. & Stahelski, A. J. (1988). The systematic measurement of French and Ravens' bases of social power in work groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 375-389.
11. Gebert, D. (1987). Führung und Innovation. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 39 (10), 941-952.
12. Gebert, D., Boerner, S. & Lanwehr, R. (2002). Promoting organizational innovativeness: Balancing chances and risks of situation control. Paper presented at The Academy of Management, August, 9-14, Denver, Colorado.
13. Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21 (4), 1081-1111.
14. Hinkin, T. R. & Schriesheim, C. A. (1989). Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 561-567.
15. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18 (3), 489-501.
16. Kelman, H. C. (1974). Further thoughts on the processes of compliance, identification, and internalization. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Perspectives on social power (pp. 125-171). Chicago: Aldine.
17. King, N. (1990). Innovation at work: The research literature. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work. Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 15-57). New York: Wiley & Sons.
18. Kipnis, D. (1990). Technology and power. New York: Springer.
19. Koslowsky, M. & Schwarzwald, J. (1993). The use of power tactics to gain compliance: Testing aspects of Raven's theory in conflictual situations. Social Behavior and Personality, 21 (2), 135-143.
20. Krause, D. E. (2004 a). Kognitiv-emotionale Prozesse als Auslöser von Innovationen. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 3 (2), 63-78.
21. Krause, D. E. (2004h). Macht und Vertrauen in Innovationsprozessen. Ein empirischer Beitrag zu einer Theorie der Führung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
22. Krause, D. E. (2004c). Situationskontrolle von Führungskräften als Innovationskatalysator. In W. Bungard, B. Koop & C. Liebig (Hrsg.), Psychologie und Wirtschaft leben. Aktuelle Themen der Wirtschaftspsychologie in Forschung und Praxis (S. 408-414). München/Mering: Hampp.
23. Krause, D.E. (2002a). Balancierte Führung als Erfolgsfaktor bei Verfahrensinnovationen. In H. Barske, A. Gerybadze, L. Hünninghausen und T. Sommerlatte (Hrsg.), Das innovative Unternehmen (S. 1-21). Düsseldorf: Symposion.
24. Krause, D. E. (2002b). Blocking innovativeness: Two empirical studies on the emotional effects of manipulation in organizations. In D. Caldenfors, J. Eklund & L. Kiviloog (Eds.), Humans in a complex environment (Vol. II, pp. 499-504). Linköping: Linköping University Press.
25. Krause, D. E., Boerner, S., Lanwehr, R. & Nachtigall, C. (2002). Der Einsatz von Macht als Bedingung des Führungserfolgs im Orchester - Eine Analyse mit Hilfe linearer Strukturgleichungsmodelle. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 1 (3), 124-137.
26. Krause, D. E. & Gebert, D. (2004). Förderung der Innovationsgeneigtheit und innovationsbezogener Verhaltensweisen. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 11 (1), 56-60.
27. Krause, D. E. & Klöhn, C. (2002). Führung in Innovationsprozessen als Balance zwischen Vertrauen und Machteinsatz. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 9(2), 71-79.
28. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21.
31. Lewis, L. K. & Seibold, D. R. (1993). Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 760-776.
32. Manz, C. C., Bastien D. T., Hostager, T. J. & Shapiro, G. L. (1989). Leadership and innovation: A longitudinal process view. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies (pp. 613-636). New York: Harper & Row.
33. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
34. Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B. & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705-750.
35. nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
36. Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W. & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying organizational change and development: Challenges for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), 697-713.
37. Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
38. Raven, B. H. (1965). Social influence and power. In I. D. Steiner & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Current studies in social psychology (pp. 371-382). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
39. Raven, B. H. (1990). Political applications of the psychology of interpersonal influence and social power. Political Psychology, 11 (3), 493-520.
40. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7 (2), 217-244.
41. Raven, B., Schwarzwald, J. & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28 (4), 307-332.
42. Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590-607.
43. Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31 (3), 405-431.
44. th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.