PatchOccupancy - A FORTRAN program for modelling patterns of species spatial distributions

Ecological Questions

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages 13-19

  Ulrich, Werner ^a  

^a NICOLAUS COPERNICUS UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Fortran; Fractal geometry; Neutral model; Patch occupancy model; Species area relation, relative abundance distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144514268     PISSN: 16447298     EISSN: 20835469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bell G., 2000, The distribution of abundance in neutral communities, Am. Nat. 155:606-617.
2. Bell G., 2001, Neutral macroecology, Science 293:2413-2418.
3. Blackburn T. M. & Gaston K. J., 2001, Linking patterns in macroecology, J. Anim. Ecol. 70:338-352.
4. Brown J. H., 1995, Macroecology, Univ. press, Chicago.
5. Brown J. H., Lomolino M. V., 1998, Biogeography, Sinauer Sunderland.
6. Brown J. H. & West G. B., 2000, Scaling in Biology, Univ. Press, Oxord.
7. Burnham K. P. & Overton W. S., 1979, Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals, Ecology 60:927-936.
8. Burrough P. A., 1983, Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil II. A non-Brownian fractal model and its application in soil survey, J. Soil Sci. 34:599-620.
9. Currie D. J., 1993, What shape is the relationship between body mass and population density, Oikos 66:353.
10. Currie D. J. & Fritz J. T., 1993, Global patterns of animal abundance and species energy use, Oikos 67:56-68.
11. Gaston K., 2000, Global patterns in biodiversity, Nature 405:220-227.
12. Hanski I., 1999, Metapopulation ecology, Univ. Press Oxford.
13. Hanski I., 2000, Extinction dept and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation, Ann. Zool. Fenn 37:271-280.
14. Hanski I. & Gilpin M. E., (eds.), 1997, Metapopulation Biology, Academic Press London.
15. Harte J. & Kinzig A. P., 1997, On the implications of species-area relationships for endemism, spatial turnover, and food web patterns, Oikos 80:417-427.
16. Harte J., Blackburn T. & Ostling A., 2001, Self Similarity and the Relationship between Abundance and Range Size, Am. Nat. 157:374-386.
17. Hastings H. M. & Sugihara G., 1993, Fractals - A User's Guide for the Natural Sciences, Univ. Press Oxford.
18. Hubbell S. P., 1997, A unified theory of biogeography and relative species abundance and its application to tropical rain forest and coral reefs, Coral Reefs 16, Suppl.: S9-S21.
19. Hubbell S. P., 2001, The unified theory of biogeography and biodiversity, Univ. press Princeton.
20. Hugueny B. & Cornell H. V., 2000, Predicting the relationship between local and regional species richness from a patch occupancy dynamics, J. Anim. Ecol. 69:194-200.
21. Leitner W. A. & Rosenzweig M. L., 1997, Nested species-area curves and stochastic sampling: a new theory, Oikos 79:503-512.
22. Lomolino M. V, 2000, Ecologist's most general, yet protean pattern: the species-area relationship, Journal of Biogeography 27:17-26.
23. Novotny V. & Kindlmann P., 1996, Distribution of body sizes in arthropod taxa and communities, Oikos 75:75-82.
24. Rahbek C. & Graves G. R., 2000, Detection of macroecological patterns in South American hummingbirds is affected by spatial scale, Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. B 267:2259-2265.
25. Rosenzweig M. L., 1995, Species diversity in space and time, Univ. Press Cambridge.
26. Ulrich W., 1999a, The numbers of species of Hymenoptera in Europe and assessment of the total number of Hymenoptera in the world, Polish J. Entomol. 68:151-164.
27. Ulrich W., 1999b, Regional and local faunas of Hymenoptera, Polish J. Entomol. 68:217-230.
28. Ulrich W., 1999c, Abundance, biomass and density boundaries in the Hymenoptera: analysis of the abundance-body size relationship and differences between forest and open landscape habitats, Polish J. Ecol 47:73-86.
29. Ulrich W., 1999f, Estimating species numbers by extrapolation I: Comparing the performance of various estimators using large model assemblages, Pol. J. Ecol. 47:271-291.
30. Ulrich W., 2000a, On species-area relationships I: fit of power function and exponential model, Pol. J. Ecol. 48:3-20.
31. Ulrich W., 2000b, On species-area relationships II: slope and factor values of power function and exponential model, Pol. J. Ecol. 48:21-35.
32. Ulrich W., 2000c, On species-area relationships III: the intercept of the power function and the exponential model, Pol. J. Ecol. 48:37-48.
33. Ulrich W., 2000d, Species area relations generated by theoretical relative abundance distributions: parameter values, model fit and relation to species saturation studies, Pol. J. Ecol. 48:67-78.
34. Ulrich W., 2001a, Relative abundance distributions of species: the need to have a new look at them, Pol. J. Ecol.: 393-407.
35. Ulrich W., 2001b, Hymenopteren in einem Kalkbuchenwald: Eine Modellgruppe zur Untersuchung von Tiergemeinschaften und ökologischen Raum-Zeit-Mustern, Schriftenreihe Forschzentrum Waldökosysteme A 171, Göttingen.
36. Ulrich W., 2002a, PatchOccupancy - a FORTRAN program for the study of species spatial distributions, http://www.uni.torun. pl/~ulrichw
37. Ulrich W., 2002b, RAD - a FORTRAN program for the study of relative abundance distributions, http://www.uni.torun. pl/~ulrichw
38. Ulrich W., 2003, NeutralModel - a FORTRAN program for the study of neutral macroecological models, http://www.uni.torun.pl/~ulrichw
39. Ulrich W. & Buszko J., 2003a, Self-similarity and the species-area relation of Polish butterflies, Basic Appl. Ecol. 4:263-270.
40. Ulrich W. & Buszko J., 2003b, Species-area relationships of butterflies in Europe and species richness forecasting, Ecography 26:365-374.
41. Whitfield J., 2002, All creatures great and small - Nature science update, http://www.narure.com/nsu/010927/010927-12.html
42. Wright D. H., 1991, Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance, J. Biogeogr. 18:463-466.