Nested species-area curves and stochastic sampling: A new theory

Oikos

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 503-512

  Leitner, Wade A ^a   Rosenzweig, Michael L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SAMPLING; SPECIES-AREA CURVE; STOCHASTIC SAMPLING;

EID: 0030617607     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3546894     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bock, C. E. and Ricklefs. R. E. 1983. Range size and local abundance of some North American songbirds: a positive correlation Am. Nat. 122: 295-299.
2. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.
3. Caswell, H. and Cohen, J. E. 1993. Local and regional regulation of species-area relations: a patch occupancy modelIn: Ricklefs, R. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99-107.
4. Coleman, B. D. 1981. On random placement and species-area relationships Math. Biosci. 54: 191-215.
5. Durrett, R. 1991. Probability: theory and examples Brooks/ Cole Pub., Belmont, CA.
6. Ford, H. A. 1990. Relationships between distribution, abundance and foraeing specialization in Australian landbirds Ornis Scand.~2t: 133-138.
7. Gaston, K. J. 1996. The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship Oikos 76: 211-220.
8. Gilpin, M. E. and Diamond, J. M. 1980. Subdivision of nature reserves and the maintenance of species diversity Nature 285: 567-568.
9. Glenn S. M. 1989. Regional analysis of mammal distributions among Canadian parks: implications for park planning. Can. J. Zool. 68: 2457-2464.
10. and Nudds, T. D. 1989. Insular biogeography of mammals
11. in Canadian parks J. Biogeogr. 16: 261-268. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis Oikos 38: 210-221.'
12. , Kouki, J. and Halkka, A. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species In: Ricklefs, R. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicaeo, pp. 108-116.
13. Higgs, A. J. and Usher, M. B. 1980. Should nature reserves be large or small? - Nature 285: 568-569.
14. Holt, R. D. 1993. Ecology at the mesoscale: The influence of regional processes on local communities In: Ricklefs, R. and Schluter, D. (eds), Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 77-88.
15. Kitchener, D. J., Chapman, A., Dell, J., Muir, B. G. and Palmer, M. 1980a. Lizard assemblage and reserve size and structure in the Western Australian wheatbelt -some implications for conservation Biol. Conserv. 17: 25-62.
16. , Chapman, A., Muir, B. G. and Palmer, M. 1980b. The conservation value for mammals of reserves in the Western Australian wheatbelt Biol. Conserv. 18: 179-207.
17. , Chapman, A., Muir, B. G. and Palmer, M. 1982. Birds in Western Australian wheatbelt reserves - implications for conservation Biol. Conserv. 22: 127-163.
18. May, R. M. 1975. Patterns of species abundance and diversity In: Cody, M. L. and Diamond, J. M. (eds), Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 81-120.
19. Palmer, M. W. and White, P.S. 1994. Scale dependence and the species-area relationship Am. Nat. 144: 717-724.
20. Preston, F. W. 1962. The canonical distribution of commonness and rarity Ecology 43: 185-215.
21. Rosenzweig, M. L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997. Species diversity In: MacGlade J (ed.), Theoretical ecology (3rd ed). Blackwell, Oxford (in press).
22. 2, z= 1/4: a reply to Connor and McCoy Am. Nat. 117: 790-793.
23. Whittaker, R. H. 1972. Evolution and measurements of species diversity Taxon 21: 213-251.
24. Williams, M. R. 1995. An extreme-value function model of the species incidence and species-area relations Ecology 76: 2607-2616.