A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of discourse coherence in typically developing children

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 15, 2005, Pages 1661-1665

  Dapretto, Mirella ^a,b   Lee, Susan S ^a   Caplan, Rochelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Ahmanson Lovelace Brain Mapping Center in the Department of Neurology   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain; Children; Development; Discourse; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Language; Lateralization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COMPREHENSION; DATA ANALYSIS; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING; LANGUAGE; LOGIC; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCHOOL CHILD; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LOGIC; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; NERVE NET; TEMPORAL LOBE;

EID: 29144492700     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000183332.28865.11     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bookheimer S. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu Rev Neurosci 2002; 25:151-188.
2. Ahmad Z, Balsamo LM, Sachs BC, Xu B, Gaillard WD. Auditory comprehension of language in young children: neural networks identified with fMRI. Neurology 2003; 60:1598-1605.
3. Balsamo LM, Xu B, Grandin CB, Petrella JR, Braniecki SH, Elliot TK, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of left hemisphere language dominance in children. Arch Neurol 2002; 59: 1168-1174.
4. Booth JR, Burman DD, Meyer JR, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM. Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16:1234-1249.
5. Brown TT, Lugar HM, Coalson RS, Miezin FM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL. Developmental changes in human cerebral functional organization for word generation. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:275-290.
6. Gaillard WD, Pugliese M, Grandin CB, Braniecki SH, Kondapaneni P, Hunter K, et al. Cortical localization of reading in normal children: an fMRI language study. Neurology 2001; 57:47-54.
7. Gaillard WD, Hertz-Pannier L, Mott SH, Barnett AS, LeBihan D, Theodore WH. Functional anatomy of cognitive development: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults. Neurology 2000; 54:180-185.
8. Holland SK, Plante E, Weber Byars A, Strawsburg RH, Schmithorst VJ, Ball WS Jr. Normal fMRI brain activation patterns in children performing a verb generation task. Neuroimage 2001; 14:837-843.
9. Schlaggar BL, Brown TT, Lugar HM, Visscher KM, Miezin FM, Petersen SE. Functional neuroanatomical differences between adults and school-age children in the processing of single words. Science 2002; 296:1476-1479.
10. Turkeltaub PE, Gareau L, Flowers DL, Zeffiro TA, Eden GF. Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6:767-773.
11. Raichle ME, Fiez JA, Videen TO, MacLeod MA, Pardo JV, Fox PT, et al. Practice-related changes in human brain functional anatomy during nonmotor learning. Cereb Cortex 1994; 4:8-26.
12. Petersen SE, van Mier H, Fiez JA, Raichle ME. The effects of practice on the functional anatomy of task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:853-860.
13. Wilke M, Lidzba K, Staudt M, Buchenau K, Grodd W, Krageloh-Mann I. Comprehensive language mapping in children, using functional magnetic resonance imaging: what's missing counts. Neuroreport 2005; 16:915-919.
14. Caplan R, Dapretto M. Making sense during conversation: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 2001; 12:3625-3632.
15. Caplan R. Discourse deficits in children with schizophrenia spectrum disorder. In: Beichtman JH, Cohen N, Konstantareas M, Tannock R, editors. Language, learning, and behavior disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 156-177.
16. Woods RP, Dapretto M, Sicotte NL, Toga AW, Mazziotta JC. Creation and use of a Talairach-compatible atlas for accurate, automated, nonlinear intersubject registration, and analysis of functional imaging data. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8:73-79.
17. Kang HC, Burgund ED, Lugar HM, Petersen SE, Schlaggar BL. Comparison of functional activation foci in children and adults using a common stereotactic space. Neuroimage 2003; 19:16-28.
18. Noesselt T, Shah NJ, Jancke L. Top-down and bottom-up modulation of language related areas: an fMRI study. BMC Neurosci 2003; 4:13.
19. Beeman MJ, Chiarello C. Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Curr Directions Psychol Sci 1998; 7:2-8.
20. Bottini G, Corcoran R, Sterzi R, Paulesu E, Schenone P, Scarpa P, et al. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain 1994; 117:1241-1253.
21. Kircher TT, Brammer M, Tous Andreu N, Williams SC, McGuire PK. Engagement of right temporal cortex during processing of linguistic context. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39:798-809.
22. Nichelli P, Grafman J, Pietrini P, Clark K, Lee KY, Miletich R. Where the brain appreciates the moral of a story. Neuroreport 1995; 6:2309-2313.
23. Rodd JM, Davis MH, Johnsrude IS. The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. Cereb Cortex 2005; 15:1261-1269.
24. St George M, Kutas M, Martinez A, Sereno MI. Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain 1999; 122:1317-1325.
25. Mitchell TV, Morey RA, Inan S, Belger A. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measure of automatic and controlled auditory processing. Neuroreport 2005; 16:457-461.