Some evidence of a pluralistic discipline: A narrative analysis of public administrationb symposia

Public Administration Review

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 728-738

  Miller, Hugh T ^a   Jaja, Cheedy ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Highline Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144457971     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00501.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bingham, Richard D., and William M. Bowen. 1994. "Main-stream" Public Administration over Time: A Topical Content Analysis of Public Administration Review. Public Administration Review 54(2): 204-8.
2. Box, Richard. 1994, An Examination of the Debate over Research in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 52(1): 62-69.
3. Brower, Ralph, Mitchel Abolafia, and Jered Carr. 2000. On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research. Administration and Society 32(4): 363-97.
4. Derrida, Jacques. 1979. Spurs: Nietzsche's Styles. Translated by Barbara Harlow. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Dubnick, Melvin. 2000. Spirited Dialogue: The Case for Administrative Evil: A Critique. Public Administration Review 60(5): 466-74.
6. Fischer, Frank. 1984. Organizational Expertise and Bureaucratic Control: Behavioral Science as Managerial Ideology. In Critical Studies in Organization and Bureaucracy, rev. and exp. ed., edited by Frank Fischer and Carmen Sirianni, 174-95. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
7. Forrester, John P., and Sheila Watson. 1994. An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspectives of Editors and Editorial Board Members. Public Administration Review 54(5): 474-82.
8. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.
9. Goss, Robert P. 1996. A Distinct Public Administration Ethics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(4): 573-97.
10. Houston, David, and Sybil Delevan. 1990. Public Administration Research: An Assessment of Journal Publications. Public Administration Review 50(6): 674-81.
11. Kass, Henry. 1996. The Logics of Trust: The Foundational Role of Institutions in Building Social Trust. Administrative Theory and Praxis 18(2): 57-73.
12. Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Lan, Zhiyong, and Kathleen Anders. 2000. A Paradigmatic View of Contemporary Public Administration Research: An Empirical Test. Administration and Society 32(2): 138-65.
14. McCurdy, Howard. 1986. Public Administration: A Bibliographic Guide to the Literature. New York: Marcel Dekker.
15. McCurdy, Howard, and Robert Cleary. 1984. Why Can't We Resolve the Research Issue in Public Administration? Public Administration Review 44(1): 49-55.
16. Meier, Kenneth J. 1997. Bureaucracy and Democracy: The Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy. Public Administration Review 57(3): 193-99.
17. Miller, Hugh T. 2002. Postmodern Public Policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18. Miller, Hugh T., and Charles Fox. 2001. The Epistemic Community. Administration and Society. 32(6): 668-85.
19. Mishler, Elliot. 1985. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
20. Morgan, Douglas. 1996. Institutional Survival in the Postmodern Age: Administrative Practice and American Constitutional Legacy. Administrative Theory and Praxis 18(2): 42-56.
21. Mosher, Frederick. 1982. Democracy and the Public Service. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Murray, Nancy. 1997. In Search of Truth: Eastern Metaphysics, Quantum Science and Public Administration Philosophy. Administrative Theory and Praxis 19(3): 368-79.
23. Newell, William, and Jack Meek. 1997. What Can Public Administration Learn from Complex System Theory? Administrative Theory and Praxis 19(3): 318-30.
24. Ostrom, Vincent. 1973. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Rev. ed. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
25. Paltridge, Brian. 2000. Genre Knowledge and Teaching Professional Communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 43(4): 397-401.
26. Perry, James, and Kenneth Kraemer. 1986. Research Methodology in the Public Administration Review 1975-1984. Public Administration Review 46(3): 215-26.
27. Riessman, Catherine Kohler. 1993. Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Roe, Emery. 1994. Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29. Romzek, Barbara, and Jennifer Utter. 1996. Career Dynamics of Congressional Legislative Staff: Preliminary Profile and Research Questions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(3): 415-42.
30. Simon, Herbert A. 1976. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
31. Skinner, Quentin. 1988. Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action. In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by James Tulley, 97-118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Stallings, Robert, and James Ferris. 1988. Public Administration Research: Works in PAR 1940-1984. Public Administration Review 48(1): 580-87.
33. Sweet, Virginia. 1997. Incorporating Nonlinear Thinking into Public Administration's Purview. Administrative Theory and Praxis 19(3): 331-41.
34. Taylor, Frederick Winslow. 1967. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Norton.
35. Welch, Eric, and Wilson Wong. 1998. Public Administration in a Global Context: Bridging the Gaps of Theory and Practice between Western and Nonwestern Nations. Public Administration Review 58(1): 40-49.
36. White, Jay. 1999. Taking Language Seriously: The Narrative Foundations of Public Administration Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
37. White, Jay, and Guy Adams. 1994. Research in Public Administration: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.