Commentary: Asking a series of questions to determine the type of consumer or trained panel needed

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 539-545

  Muñoz, Alejandra M ^a  

^a IRIS: International Resources for Insights and Solutions   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144448765     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2005.00043.x     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. CHAMBERS, E. and SMITH, E.A. 1991. The use of qualitative research in product research and development. In Sensory Science Theory and Applications in Foods (H.T. Lawless and B.P. Klein, eds.) pp. 395-412, Dekker, New York, NY.
2. KING, S.C., WEBER, A.J., MEISELMAN, H.L. and LV, N. 2004. The effect of meal situation, social interaction, physical environment and choice on food acceptability. Food Qual. Pref. 75, 645-654.
3. MEISELMAN, H.L., JOHNSON, J.L., REEVE, W. and CROUCH, J.E. 2000. Demonstrations of the influence of the eating environment on food acceptance. Appetite 35, 231-237.
4. MUÑOZ, A.M. 1997. Importance, types and applications of consumer data relationships. In ASTM Manual 30. Relating Consumer, Descriptive and Laboratory Data to Better Understand Consumer Responses (A.M. Muñoz, ed.) pp. 1-7, ASTM press, West Conshohocken, PA.
5. MUÑOZ, A.M. 2003. Sensory mythology. In Viewpoints and Controversies in Sensory Science and Consumer Product Testing (H.R. Moskowitz, A.M. Muñoz and M. Gacula Jr, eds.) pp. 56-72, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
6. MUÑOZ, A.M. and EVERITT, M. 2004. Non traditional consumer research methods. Rose Marie Pangborn Sensory Symposium 2003 workshop summary. Food Qual. Pref. 15, 887-890.
7. RESURRECCION, A.V.A. 1998. Consumer Sensory Testing for Product Development. Aspen Publication, Frederick, MD.