The relationship between personality and peers' judgments of the appropriateness of accommodations for individuals with disabilities

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1418-1439

  García, María Fernanda ^a   Paetzoldd, Ramona L ^b   Colella, Adrienne ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144446129     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02177.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
3. Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 (1990).
4. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
5. Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111 -118.
6. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 715-722.
7. Barrick, M. R., Neubert, M. J., Mount, M. K., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 377-391.
8. Biernat, M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Stigma and stereotypes. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 88-125). New York, NY: Guilford.
9. Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.
10. Christman, L. A., & Slaten, B. L. (1991). Attitudes toward people with disabilities and judgments of employment potential. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 467-475.
11. Cleveland, J. N., Barnes-Farrell, J., & Ratz, J. M. (1997). Accommodation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 77-108.
12. Colella, A. (2001). Coworker distributive fairness judgments of the workplace accommodation of employees with disabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 100-116.
13. Colella, A., & Goparaju, S. (1999, April). Reactions to accommodation due to disability: Effects of disability, reward, and outcome. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Atlanta, GA.
14. Colella, A., Paetzold, R., & Belliveau, M. (2004). Factors affecting coworkers' procedural justice inferences of the workplace accommodation of employees with disabilities. Personnel Psychology, 57, 1-23.
15. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 853-863.
17. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
18. Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., & Neufeld, D. (1998). Telework and the balance between work and family: Is telework part of the problem or part of the solution? In M. Igbaria & M. Tan (Eds.), The virtual workplace (pp. 218-255). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
19. Florey, A. T., & Harrison, D. A. (2000). Responses to informal accommodation requests from employees with disabilities: Multistudy evidence on willingness to comply. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 224-233.
20. Foster v. Time Warner Entertainment Co., 250 F.3d 1189 (8th Cir. 2001).
21. Fredricks, A., & Dossett, D. (1983). Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 501-512.
22. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
23. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
24. Harasymiw, S. J., Home, M. D., & Lewis, S. C. (1976). A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance. Rehabilitation Literature, 37, 98-102.
25. Havill, V. L., Besevegis, E., & Mouroussaki, S. (1998). Agreeableness as a diachronic personality trait. In G. A. Kohnstamm & C. F. Halverson, Jr. (Eds.), Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big 5? The LEA series in personality and child psychology (pp. 49-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Hazer, J. T., & Bedell, K. V. (2000). Effects of seeking accommodation and disability on preemployment evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1201-1223.
27. Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323-362.
28. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751-765.
29. Judge, T. A., Martocchio, J. J., & Thoresen, C. J. (1997). Five-factor model of personality and employee absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 745-755.
30. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107-122.
31. Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
32. Lee, B. (1996). Legal requirements and employer responses to accommodating employees with disabilities. Human Resource Management Review, 6, 231-251.
33. Lee, B., & Newman, K. (1995). Employer responses to disability: Preliminary evidence and a research agenda. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8, 209-229.
34. Lee, B., & Thompson, R. J. (1998). Reducing the consequences of disability: Policies to reduce discrimination against disabled workers. In T. Thomason, J. F. Burton, Jr., & D. E. Hyatt (Eds.), New approaches to disability in the workplace (pp. 155-181). Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
35. Paetzold, R., Garcia, M. F., & Colella, A. (2005). Manipulating disability, accommodation, and outcome: Peer perceptions of accommodation unfairness. Manuscript under review.
36. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495-524.
37. Sparrow, P., & Daniels, K. (1999). Human resource management and the virtual organization: Mapping the future research issues. In C. Cooper & D. Rousseau (Eds.), Trends in organizational behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 45-61). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
38. Stone, D. L., & Colella, A. (1996). A framework for studying the effects of disability on work experiences. Academy of Management Review, 21, 352-401.
39. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
40. Triandis, H., & Davis, E. (1965). Race and belief as determinants of behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 715-725.
41. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2000). Labor force status of persons with a work disability by age: 1999. Washington, DC: Congressional Information Services, Inc.
42. Wanberg, C. R., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of proactivity in the socialization process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 373-385.
43. West, M. S., & Cardy, R. L. (1997). Accommodating claims of disability: The potential impact of abuses. Human Resource Management Review, 7, 233-246.