Protected learning time in general practice: A question of relevance?

Education for Primary Care

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 680-687

  Lucas, Beverley ^a   Small, Neil ^a,b   Greasley, Pete ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Health Research ^*

Author keywords

Educational management; Evaluation; General practice; General practitioners

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL STAFF; NURSE; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TIME; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

EID: 28844492258     PISSN: 14739879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dakin G and Coleman M (1999) Target Doncaster, NHS Beacon Services Award Winner. Available at: www.doncastertarget.nhs.uk
2. The PCT Competency Framework. NHS Modernisation Agency: National Primary and Care Trust Development Programme. Available at: www.natpact.nhs.uk
3. Brooks N and Barr J (2004) Evaluation of protected learning time in a primary care trust. Quality in Primary Care 12: 29-35.
4. Rutherford J and McArthur M (2004) A qualitative account of the factors affecting team-learning in primary care. Education for Primary Care 15: 352-60.
5. Calman KC (1998) A Review of Continuing Professional Development in General Practice. Report of the Chief Medical Officer. Department of Health: London.
6. Stinson L, Dickson P and Pearson D (2004) Support, security, stimulation: the secret of recruitment and retention in primary care trusts. Education for Primary Care 15: 291-7.
7. Senge PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Currency and Doubleday: New York.
8. Bradford City Teaching Primary Care Trust (2001/2) Annual Report. Bradford City tPCT.
9. Bradford City Teaching Primary Care Trust (2002) Protected Learning Time Evaluation Event: summary document. Bradford City tPCT.
10. Bradford City Teaching Primary Care Trust (2002/3) Annual Report. Bradford City tPCT.
11. Øvretviet J (1998) Evaluating Health Interventions. Open University: Buckingham.
12. Scriven M (1967) The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler R et al (eds) Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Rand McNally: Chicago.
13. Kvale S (1996) Interview: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage: London.
14. Kaner EF, Haighton CA and McAvoy BR (1998) So much post, so busy with practice - so no time!: a telephone survey of general practitioners' reasons for not participating in postal questionnaire surveys. British Journal of General Practice 48: 1067-9.
15. Glaser B and Strauss AL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine: Chicago.
16. Strauss A and Corbin J (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage: London.
17. Gibbs GR (2002) Qualitative Data Analysis: explorations with Nvivo. Open University Press: Buckingham.
18. www.dundee.ac.uk/generalpractice/postgradu ate/PLTintro.htm (accessed 23/01/04).
19. www.hobtpct.nhs.uk/hobpeople/plt/ (accessed 17/02/03).
20. Sabey A and Jacobs K (2003) Live and learn. Health Service Journal 16: 32-3.
21. Lucas BJ and Small N (2004) An Evaluation of Protected Learning Time in Bradford City Teaching Primary Care Trust. Available at: www.bradfordcity-pct. nhs.uk
22. CAIPE (1997) Interprofessional education - a definition. CAIPE Bulletin 13.
23. Satin DG (1987) The difficulties of interdisciplinary education: lessons from three failures and a success. Educational Gerontology 13: 53-69.
24. Freeth D (2001) Sustaining interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care 15(1): 37-46.