The application of youth substance use media campaigns to problem gambling: A critical evaluation

Journal of Health Communication

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 681-700

  Byrne, Andrea M ^a,c   Dickson, Laurie ^b   Derevensky, Jeffrey L ^b   Gupta, Rina ^b   Lussier, Isabelle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ROYAL OTTAWA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 28844479447     PISSN: 10810730     EISSN: 10870415     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10810730500326658     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. *Abt Associates. (1999). Independent evaluation of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program: Sixth annual report. Cambridge, MA: Author.
2. *Abt Associates. (2000). Independent evaluation of the Massachusetts Tobacco Control Program: Seventh annual report. Cambridge, MA: Author.
3. American Academy of Pediatrics. (1999). Marijuana: A continuing concern for pediatricians. Pediatrics, 104, 982-985.
4. Azmier, J. J. (2000). Canadian gambling behaviour and attitudes: Summary report. Calgary, Alberta: Canada West Foundation.
5. *Backer, T. E. & Marston, G. (1993). Partnership for a drug-free America: An experiment in social marketing. In T. E. Backer & E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 10-24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
6. *Bauer, U. E., Johnson, T. M., Hopkins, R. S., & Brooks, R. G. (2000). Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: Findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 723-728.
7. *Biener, L. (2002). Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: What teenagers think. Tobacco Control, 11(Suppl. 2), 43-46.
8. *Block, L. G., Morwitz, V. G., Putsis, W. P., & Sen, S. K. (2002). Assessing the impact of anti-drug advertising on adolescent drug consumption: Results from a behavioral economic model. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1346-1351.
9. Brown, J. D. & Witherspoon, E. M. (2002). The mass media and American adolescents' health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(Suppl. 1), 153-170.
10. *Buchanan, D. R. & Wallack, L. (1998). This is partnership for a drug-free America: Any questions? Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 329-356.
11. *Clarke, S. R. (1998). A field of study investigating behavior change in high-risk groups. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(12-A), 4482.
12. DeJong, W. (2002). The role of mass media campaigns in reducing high-risk drinking among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Suppl. 14), 182-192.
13. Derevensky, J. L. & Gupta, R. (2000). Youth gambling: A clinical and research perspective. e-Gambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 2, 1-11.
14. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., Dickson, L., Hardoon, K., & Deguire, A. E. (2003). Understanding youth gambling problems: A conceptual framework. In D. Romer (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Derzon, J. H. & Lipsey, M. W. (2002). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass-communication for changing substance-use knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 231-258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Dickson, L. M., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2002). The prevention of gambling problems in youth: A conceptual framework. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 97-159.
17. Donaldson, S. I. (2002). High-potential mediators of drug-abuse prevention program efforts. In W. D. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 215-230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. *Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., Lorch, E., Zimmerman, R., & Harrington, N. (2002). Attention, persuasive communication, and prevention. In W. Crano & M. Burgoon (Eds.), Mass media and drug prevention: Classic and contemporary theories and research (pp. 119-143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. *Earle, R. (2000). The art of cause marketing: How to use advertising to change personal behavior and public policy. Chicago: NTC Business Books.
20. sm and "Think. Don't Smoke" tobacco countermarketing campaigns (Legacy First Look Report 9). Washington, DC: American Legacy Foundation.
21. *Farrelly, M. C., Healton, C. G., Davis, K. C., Messeri, P., Hersey, J. C., & Haviland, M. L. (2002). Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 901-907.
22. Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., Von Haeften, I., & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 238-246.
23. Flay, B. R. & Cook, T. D. (1989). Three models of summative evaluation of prevention campaigns with a mass media component. In R. E. Rice & C. E. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (2nd ed., pp. 175-196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
24. Gentile, D. A. & Walsh, D. A. (2002). A normative study of family media habits. Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 157-178.
25. *Gilpin, E. A., Emery, S. L., Farkas, A. J., Distefan, J. M., White, M. M., & Pierce, J. P. (2001). The California Tobacco Control Program: A decade of progress, results from the California Tobacco Surveys, 1990-1999 - Final Report, La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego.
26. * Glider, P., Midyett, S. J., Mills-Novoa, B., Johannessen, K., & Collins, C. (2001). Challenging the collegiate rite of passage: A campus-wide social marketing media campaign to reduce binge drinking. Journal of Drug Education, 31, 207-220.
27. Goldman, L. K. & Glantz, S. A. (1998). Evaluation of antismoking advertising campaigns. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 772-777.
28. *Gomberg, L., Schneider, S. K., & DeJong, W. (2001). Evaluation of social norms marketing campaign to reduce high-risk drinking at the University of Mississippi. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 375-389.
29. Gupta, R. & Derevensky, J. L. (1998). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 319-345.
30. Gupta, R. & Derevensky, J. L. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems: From research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 315-342.
31. Hardoon, K. K. & Derevensky, J. L. (2002). Child and adolescent gambling behavior: Current knowledge. Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 7, 263-281.
32. *Harris, J. E., Connolly, G. N., Brooks, D., & Davis, B. (1996). Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and an antismoking campaign - Massachusetts, 1990-1996. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 45, 966-970.
33. Hornick, R. C. (2002). Public health communication: Making sense of contradictory evidence. In R. C. Hornik (Eds.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 1-19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. *Hu, T., Sung, H., & Keeler, T. E. (1995). Reducing cigarette consumption in California: Tobacco taxes vs an anti-smoking media campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 1218-1222.
35. Jacobs, D. F. (1998). An overarching theory of addiction: A new paradigm for understanding and treating addictive behaviors. Paper presented at the National Research Council's Study Session on Pathological Gambling: Technology, Socioeconomic Impact, and Treatment, Washington, DC.
36. Jacobs, D. F. (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: An analysis of long term trends and future prospects. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 119-152.
37. *Jeffrey, L. R., Negro, P., Miller, D. S., & Frisone, J. D. (2003). The Rowan University social norms project. In H. Wesley Perkins (Ed.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 100-110). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Jessor, R. (Ed.). (1998). New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior, New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. *Johnson, C. A., Pentz, M. A., Weber, M. D., Dwyer, J. H., Baer, N., MacKinnon, D. P., Hansen, W. B., & Flay, B. R. (1990). Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high-risk and low-risk adolescents. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 58, 447-456.
40. *Kelly, K. J., Swaim, R. C., & Wayman, J. C. (1996). The impact of a localized antidrug media campaign on targeted variables associated with adolescent drug use. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 15, 238-251.
41. Korn, D. A. & Shaffer, H. J. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 289-365.
42. *Lalonde, B., Rabinowitz, P., Shefsky, M. L., & Washienko, K. (1997). La esperanza del Valle: Alcohol prevention novelas for Hispanic youth and their families. Health Education and Behavior, 24, 587-602.
43. Landman, A., Ling, P. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2002). Tobacco industry youth smoking prevention programs: Protecting the industry and hurting tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 917-930.
44. *Lange, J. E. & Voas, R. B. (2000). Youth escaping limits on drinking: Binging in Mexico. Addiction, 95, 521-528.
45. *Les Etudes de Marche Createc. (1998). Quantitative post-test of "Challenge to Youth" TV campaign, Montreal, QC: Health Canada.
46. *Linkenbach, J. W. (2003). The Montana Model: Development and overview of a seven-step process for implementing macro-level social norms campaigns. In H. Wesley Perkins (Eds.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 182-205). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47. *Linkenbach, J. W. & Perkins, H. W. (2003). Most of us are tobacco-free: An eight-month social norms campaign reducing youth initiation of smoking in Montana. In H. Wesley Perkins (Eds.), The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians (pp. 224-234). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48. McGuire, W. J. (2001). Input and output variables currently promising for constructing persuasive communications. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 22-48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Messerlian, C., Byrne, A. M., & Derevensky, J. L. (2004). Gambling, youth and the Internet: Should we be concerned? The Canadian Child Psychiatry Review, 13(1), 3-6.
50. *Middlesex-London Health Unit. (2001). Process evaluation of the Central West/Southwest binge drinking media campaign: Implications for practice and lessons learned, London, Ontario: Middlesex-London Health Unit.
51. *Murray, D. M., Prokhorov, A. V., & Harty, K. C. (1994). Effects of a statewide antismoking campaign on mass media messages and smoking beliefs. Preventive Medicine, 23, 54-60.
52. National Research Council. (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53. Nielsen Media Research. (1998). 1998 Report on Television. New York: Nielsen Media Research.
54. *Office of the National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). (2002). Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: Fifth semi-annual report of findings. Washington, DC: Author.
55. *Oregon Department of Human Services, Health Services. (2003). Make Oregon healthier: Saving lives and saving dollars. Tobacco Prevention and Education in Oregon: Program Report 2001-2003. Portland: Author.
56. *Oregon Health Division, Department of Human Resources. (1999). Executive summary: Oregon's Tobacco Prevention and Education Program. Tobacco Prevention and Education Program Report 1999. Portland: Author.
57. *Oregon Health Division, Department of Human Services. (2000). Delivering results: Saving lives and saving dollars. Tobacco Prevention and Education in Oregon: Program Report 2000. Portland: Author.
58. *Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E. P., Hoyle, R. H., & Stephenson, M. T. (2001). Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: Tests of sensation-seeking targeting. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 292-296.
59. *Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Lorch, E. P., Hoyle, R. H., & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Television campaigns and sensation seeking targeting of adolescent marijuana use: A controlled time series approach. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 35-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. *Partnership for a Drug-Free America (PDFA). (2000). Partnership attitude tracking study: Teens in grades 7 through 12. Retrieved May 11, 2003, from http://www.drugfreeamerica.org
61. *Partnership for a Drug-Free America (PDFA). (2002). Partnership attitude tracking study: Teens. Retrieved May 11, 2003, from http://www.drugfreeamerica.org
62. *Pentz, M. & Valente, T. (1993). Project STAR: A substance abuse prevention campaign in Kansas City. In T. E. Backer & E. M. Rogers (Eds.), Organizational aspects of health communication campaigns: What works? (pp. 37-60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
63. Peracchio, L. A. & Luna, D. (1998). The development of an advertising campaign to discourage smoking initiation among children and youth. Journal of Advertising, 27(3), 49-56.
64. *Peters, L. (1995). An evaluation of the Quit 4 life Smoking Cessation Program: Final Report. Ottawa: Health Canada.
65. *Pierce, J. P., Emery, S., & Gilpin, E. (2002). The California Tobacco control program: A long-term health communication project. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 97-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66. *Riemer, A., Christiansen, A. L., Ahrens, D., & Moberg, D. P. (2003). Evaluation of the Wisconsin Tobacco control board's counter-marketing campaign: Wisconsin youth 2001. Monitoring and evaluation program, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Medical School.
67. Roberts, D. F. (2000). Media and youth: Access, exposure, and privatization. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27(Suppl. 2), 8-14.
68. Roberts, D. F., Foehr, U. G., Rideout, V. J., & Brodie, M. (1999). Kids and media in the new millennium, Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
69. *Rohrbach, L. A., Howard-Pitney, B., Unger, J. B., Dent, C. W., Howard, K. A., Cruz, T. B., Fishbein, H., Ribisl, K. M., Norman, G. J., Fishbein, H., & Johnson, C. A. (2002). Independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program: Relationships between program exposure and outcomes, 1996-1998. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 975-984.
70. Salmon, C. T. & Murray-Johnson, L. (2001). Communication campaign effectiveness: Critical distinctions. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 168-180). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Schinke, S., Brounstein, P., & Gardner, S. (2002). Science-based prevention programs and principles, 2002, (DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 03-3764). Rockville, MD: Centre for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
72. Shaffer, H. J. & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193-214.
73. Shaffer, H. J. & Kidman, R. (2003). Shifting perspectives on gambling and addictions. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 1-6.
74. * Siegel, M. & Biener, L. (2000). The impact of an antismoking media campaign on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 380-386.
75. *Siegel, M. & Biener, L. (2002). The impact of antismoking media campaigns on progression to established smoking: Results of a longitudinal youth study in Massachusetts. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 115-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. *Sly, D. F. & Heald, G. (1999a). Florida anti-tobacco media evaluation: One year assessment with national comparisons, Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
77. *Sly, D. F. & Heald, G. (1999b). Florida anti-tobacco media evaluation: Eighteen month assessment, Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
78. *Sly, D. F., Heald, G., & Ray, S. (2000). Preventing youth smoking behaviors: How Florida's "truth" works. Final Report on the 2000 follow-up survey of Florida youth and early young adults, Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
79. *Sly, D. F., Heald, G., & Ray, S. (2001). The Florida "truth" anti-tobacco media evaluation: Design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tobacco Control, 10, 9-15.
80. *Sly, D. F., Hopkins, R. S., Trapido, E., & Ray, S. (2001). Influence of a counteradvertising media campaign on initiation of smoking: The Florida "truth" campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 233-238.
81. *Sly, D. F., Trapido, E., & Ray, S. (2002). Evidence of the dose effects of an antitobacco counteradvertising campaign. Preventive Medicine, 35, 511-518.
82. *Stephenson, M. T., Morgan, S. E., Lorch, E. P., Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., & Hoyle, R. H. (2002). Predictors of exposure from an anti-marijuana media campaign: Outcome research assessing sensation seeking targeting. Health Communication, 14, 23-43.
83. Stinchfield, R. & Winters, K. C. (1998). Gambling and problem gambling among youth. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 556, 172-185.
84. Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children's and adolescents' development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 7-30.
85. Villani, S. (2001). Impact of media on children and adolescents: A 10-year review of the research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 392-401.
86. *Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., Johnson, M. B., Lange, J. E., & Baker, J. (2002). Operation safe crossing: Using science within a community intervention. Addiction, 97, 1205-1214.
87. Wardman, D., el-Guebaly, N., & Hodgins, D. (2001). Problem and pathological gambling in North American Aboriginal populations: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 81-100.
88. Weiss, C. (1997). Theory-based evaluation: Past, present and future. In D. J. Rog & D. Fournier (Eds.), Progress and future directions in evaluation: Perspectives on theory, practice, and methods (pp. 41-57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
89. Woodard, E. H. & Gridina, N. (2000). Media in the home: The fifth annual survey of parents and children, Philadelphia, PA: The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania.
90. *Worden, J. K. & Flynn, B. S. (2002). Using mass media to prevent cigarette smoking. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 23-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
91. Wynne, H., Smith, G., & Jacobs, D. (1996). Adolescent gambling and problem gambling in Alberta, Edmonton: Alberta Alcohol & Drug Abuse Commission.