Erratum: Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context (Sex Roles (2005) 53 (573-589) DOI:10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7);Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context

Sex Roles

Volumn 53, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 573-589

  Taylor, Catherine A ^a,b,c   Sorenson, Susan B ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fault; Intimate partner violence; Responsibility; Social norms; Solution

Indexed keywords

EID: 28844472639     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-006-9155-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (80)

1. Anderson, M. A., Gillig, P. M., Sitaker, M., McCloskey, K., Malloy, K., & Grigsby, N. (2003). "Why doesn't she just leave?" A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18(3), 151-155.
2. Bethke, T. M., & Dejoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(1), 36-51.
3. Bourque, L. B. (1989). Defining rape. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
4. Brownlee, K., & Chlebovec, L. (2004). A group for men who abuse their partners: Participant perceptions of what was helpful. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74(2), 209-213.
5. Bryant, S. A., & Spencer, G. A. (2003). University students' attitudes about attributing blame in domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18(6), 369-376.
6. Buel, S. (1999). Fifty obstacles to leaving, a.k.a., Why abuse victims stay. The Colorado Lawyer, 28, 19-28.
7. California Health Interview Survey. (2002). CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 4 - response rates. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.
8. Coker, D. (1999). Enhancing autonomy for battered women: Lessons from Navajo peacemaking [Review]. UCLA Law Review, 47(1), 1-111.
9. Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women's use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1364-1389.
10. Davies, M., Pollard, P., & Archer, J. (2001). The influence of victim gender and sexual orientation on judgments of the victim in a depicted stranger rape. Violence and Victims, 16(6), 607-619.
11. Delgado, A. R., & Bond, R. A. (1993). Attenuating the attribution of responsibility: The lay perception of jealousy as a motive for wife battery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(16), 1337-1356.
12. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
13. Dugoni, B. L., & Baldwin, A. K. (2000). Cognitive lab report, research project (#4943) on DV vignettes. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center at University of Chicago.
14. El-Bassel, N., Gilbert, L., Rajah, V., Foleno, A., & Frye, V. (2001). Social support among women in methadone treatment who experience partner violence. Violence Against Women, 7(3), 246-274.
15. Fabiano, P. M., Perkins, W., Berkowitz, A., Linkenbach, J., & Stark, C. (2003). Engaging men as social justice allies in ending violence against women: Evidence for a social norms approach. Journal of American College Health, 52(3), 105-112.
16. Feather, N. T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35(7-8), 507-519.
17. Geller, J. A. (1998). Conjoint therapy for the treatment of partner abuse: Indications and contradictions. In A. R. Roberts (Ed.), Battered women and their families: Intervention strategies and treatment programs (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
18. Gelles, R. J. (1983). An exchange/social theory. In D. Finkelhor, R. J. Gelles, G. T. Hotaling, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 151-165). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Goyder, J. (1987). The silent minority: Nonrespondents on sample surveys. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20. Groves, R. M., & Couper, M. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: Wiley.
21. Hannon, R., Hall, D. S., Nash, H., Formati, J., & Hopson, T. (2000). Judgments regarding sexual aggression as a function of sex of aggressor and victim. Sex Roles, 43(5-6), 311-322.
22. Harris, R. J., & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse-It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30(7-8), 553-565.
23. Harrison, L. A., & Abrishami, G. (2004). Dating violence attributions: Do they differ for in-group and out-group members who have a history of dating violence? Sex Roles, 51(9-10), 543-550.
24. Harrison, L. A., & Esqueda, C. W. (2000). Effects of race and victim drinking on domestic violence attributions. Sex Roles, 42(11-12), 1043-1057.
25. Heggie, D. L. (1986). The. influence of social networks on battered women. Unpublished Dissertation Abstracts International, 47(8-b), 3524, Fuller Theological Seminary.
26. Heyman, R. E., & Schlee, K. (2003). Stopping wife abuse via physical aggression couples treatment. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 7(1-2), 135-157.
27. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.
28. Home, A. M. (1994). Attributing responsibility and assessing gravity in wife abuse situations: A comparative study of police and social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 19(1-2), 67-84.
29. Horne, C. (2001). Sociological perspectives on the emergence of social norms. In M. Hechter & K.-D. Opp (Eds.), Social norms (pp. 3-34). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
30. Horton, A. L., & Johnson, B. (1993). Profiles and strategies for women who have ended abuse. Families in Society, 74(8), 481-492.
31. Howard, J. A. (1984). The "normal" victim: The effects of gender stereotypes on reactions to victims. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(3), 270-281.
32. Hoyle, C., & Sanders, A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence - from victim choice to victim empowerment? British Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 14-36.
33. Hyman, I., Guruge, S., Stewart, D., & Ahmad, F. (2000). Primary prevention of violence against women. Women 's Health Issues, 10(6), 288-293.
34. Imhof, L., Murphy, S. R., & Moore, W. (2001). California vignettes study, methodology report. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
35. Jackson, S., Feder, L., Forde, D. R., Davis, R. C., Maxwell, C. D., & Taylor, B. G. (2003). Batterer intervention programs: Where do we go from here? (No. NCJ 195079). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
36. Kanekar, S., Pinto, N. J. P., & Mazumdar, D. (1985). Causal and moral responsibility of victims of rape and robbery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(7), 622-637.
37. Katz, J., & Arias, I. (2001). Women's attributions for hypothetical dating violence: Effects of partner alcohol use and violence severity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(7), 1458-1473.
38. Klein, E., Campbell, J. C., Soler, E., & Ghez, M. (1997). Ending domestic, violence: Changing public perceptions/halting the epidemic. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Koss, M. P. (2000, November). Blame, shame, and community: Justice responses to violence against women. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1332-1343.
40. Labine, A. L. (2001). Distribution of domestic violence blame and traditional/egalitarian sex-role, orientation: A clinical vs. non-clinical population comparison. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Arkansas.
41. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Shlien-Dellinger, R. K., Huss, M. T., & Kramer, V. L. (2004). Attributions about perpetrators and victims of interpersonal abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(4), 484-498.
42. Lehmann, M., & Santilli, N. R. (1996). Sex differences in perceptions of spousal abuse. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(5, Special issue), 229-238.
43. Letellier, P. (1994). Gay and bisexual domestic violence victimization: Challenges to feminist theory and responses to violence. Violence and Victims, 9(2), 95-106.
44. Locke, L. M., & Richman, C. L. (1999). Attitudes toward domestic violence: Race and gender issues. Sex Roles, 40(3-4), 227-247.
45. Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the spouse assault replication program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
46. Meloy, J. R., Cowett, P. Y., Parker, S. B., Hofland, B., & Friedland, A. (1997). Domestic protection orders and the prediction of subsequent criminality and violence toward protectees. Psychotherapy; Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 34(4), 447-458.
47. Mills, L. G. (2003). Insult to injury: Rethinking our responses to intimate abuse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48. Moore, T. M., Eisler, R. M., & Franchina, J. J. (2000). Causal attributions and affective responses to provocative female partner behavior by abusive and nonabusive males. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 69-80.
49. Nabi, R. L., & Horner, J. R. (2001). Victims with voices: How abused women conceptualize the problem of spousal abuse and implications for intervention and prevention. Journal of Family Violence, 16(3), 237-253.
50. Nabi, R. L., Meehan-Starck, T., & Sunderland, A. (2000). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: The results of a survey of adults in Philadelphia (Survey Series No. 6). Philadelphia: The Annenberg Public Policy Center.
51. O'Campo, P., McDonnell, K., Gielen, A., Burke, J., & Chen, Y. H. (2002). Surviving physical and sexual abuse: What helps lowincome women? Patient Education and Counseling, 46(3, Special issue), 205-212.
52. O'Leary, K. D. (2001). Conjoint therapy for partners who engage in physically aggressive behavior: Rationale and research. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 5(2), 145-164.
53. O'Leary, K. D., Heyman, R. E., & Neidig, P. H. (1999). Treatment of wife abuse: A comparison of gender-specific and conjoint approaches. Behavior Therapy, 30(3), 475-505.
54. Pavlou, M., & Knowles, A. (2001). Domestic violence: Attributions, recommended punishments and reporting behavior related to provocation by the victim. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8(1), 76-85.
55. Pedhazur, E. J., & Kerlinger, F. N. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
56. Pierce, M. C., & Harris, R. J. (1993). The effect of provocation, race, and injury description on men's and women's perceptions of a wife-battering incident. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(10), 767-790.
57. Pleck, E. H. (2004). Domestic tyranny: The making of American social policy against family violence from colonial times to the present (1st Illinois ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
58. Saltzman, L. E., Green, Y. T., Marks, J. S., & Thacker, S. B. (2000). Violence against women as a public health issue: Comments from the CDC. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(4), 325-329.
59. Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem? Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1424-1448.
60. Saunders, D. G., & Hamill, R. M. (2003). Violence against women: Synthesis of research on offender interventions (No. NCJ 201222). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
61. Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101(4), 632-652.
62. Shamai, M. (1996). Couple therapy with battered women and abusive men: Does it have a future? In J. Edleson & Z. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families (pp. 201-215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
63. Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G. M., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). 'There's no smoke without fire': Are male ex-partners perceived as more 'entitled' to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94, 87-98.
64. Simon, T. R., Anderson, M., Thompson, M. P., Crosby, A. E., Shelley, G., & Sacks, J. J. (2001). Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among U.S. adults. Violence and Victims, 16(2), 115-126.
65. Smithey, M., & Straus, M. A. (2004). Primary prevention of intimate partner violence. In H. Kury & J. Obergfell-Fuchs (Eds.), Crime Prevention - New Approaches (pp. 239-276). Mainz/Germany: Weisser Ring Gemeinnutzige Verlags-GmbH.
66. Sorenson, S. B.. & Taylor, C. A. (2003). Personal awareness of domestic violence: Implications for health care. Journal of the American Medical Women 's Association, 58(1), 4-9.
67. Sorenson, S. B., & Taylor. C. A. (2005). Female aggression toward male intimate partners: An examination of social norms in a community-based sample. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 29, 78-96.
68. Stewart-Williams, S. (2002). Gender, the perception of aggression, and the overestimation of gender bias. Sex Roles, 46(5-6), 177-189.
69. Taylor, C. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (2004). Injunctive social norms of adults regarding teen dating violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(6), 468-479.
70. The Asian Population (2000). Census 2000 Brief. Retrieved March 29, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/c2kbr01-16.pdf
71. Thompson, M. P., Saltzman, L. E., & Johnson, H. (2001). Risk factors for physical injury among women assaulted by current or former spouses. Violence Against Women, 7(8), 886-899.
72. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (No. NCJ 183781). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
73. Tuckel, P., & O'Neill, H. (2001). The vanishing respondent in telephone surveys. Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal.
74. U.S. Census Bureau, State and County QuickFacts: California. (2000). Retrieved March 14, 2003, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html
75. Wandrei, M. L., & Rupert, P. A. (2000). Professional psychologists' conceptualizations of intimate partner violence. Psychotherapy, 57(3), 270-283.
76. Weinbaum, Z., Stratton, T. L., Chavez, G., Motylewski-Link. C., Barrera, N., & Courtney, J. G. (2001). Female victims of intimate partner physical domestic violence (IPP-DV), California 1998. American Journal Preventive Medicine. 21(4), 313-319.
77. West, A., & Wandrei, M. L. (2002). Intimate partner violence: A model for predicting interventions by informal helpers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(9), 972-986.
78. White, B. H., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (2002). Effects of victim sex and sexual orientation on perceptions of rape. Sex Roles, 46(5-6). 191-200.
79. Williams, K. R. (1992). Social sources of marital violence and deterrence: Testing an integrated theory of assaults between partners. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54(3), 620-629.
80. Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1992). Wife assault, costs of arrest, and the deterrence process. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29(3), 292-310.