Dating violence attributions: Do they differ for in-group and out-group members who have a history of dating violence?

Sex Roles

Volumn 51, Issue 9-10, 2004, Pages 543-550

  Harrison, Lisa A ^a,c   Abrishami, Golee ^b  

^a American Psychological Society   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dating violence; History of violence; In group bias; Social identity theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 12744271551     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-004-5464-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allen, V. L., & Wilder, D. A. (1975). Categorization, belief similarity, and intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 971-977.
2. Avery-Leaf, S., & Cascardi, M. (2002). Dating violence education: Prevention and early intervention strategies. In P. A. Schewe (Ed.). Preventing violence in relationships: Interventions across the life span (pp. 79-105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3. Bethke, T. M., & DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 36-51.
4. Bryant, S. A., & Spencer, G. A. (2003). University students' attitudes about attributing blame in domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 369-376.
5. Carlson, B. E. (1996). Dating violence: Student beliefs about consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 3-18.
6. Cauffman, E., Feldman, S. S., Jensen, L. A., & Arnett, J. J. (2000). The (un)acceptability of violence against peers and dates. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 652-673.
7. Cramer, E. P. (1999). Variables that predict verdicts in domestic violence cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1137-1150.
8. Doise, W. (1978). Groups and individuals: Explanations in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Doise, W., Csepeli, G., Dann, H., Gouge, C., Larsen, K., & Ostell, A. (1972). An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 202-204.
10. Feather, N. T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Rotes, 35, 507-519.
11. Gudjonsson, G. H., & Singh, K. K. (1989). The revised Gudjonsson Blame Attribution Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 67-70.
12. Harrison, L. A., & Willis, C. E. (1996, May). Effects of gender, race, marital status, and victim resistance on domestic violence culpability attributions. Poster presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
13. Hornstein, H. A. (1976). Cruelty and kindness: A new look at aggression and altruism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Hunter, J. A., & Stringer, M. (1991). Intergroup violence and intergroup attributions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 261-266.
15. Katz, J., & Arias, I. (2001). Women's attributions for hypothetical dating violence:Effects of partner alcohol use and violence severity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1458-1473.
16. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Geita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Kramer, R. M., & Brewer, M. B. (1984). Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1044-1057.
18. Lewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 105-127.
19. Makepeace, J. M. (1987). Social factors and victim-offender differences in courtship violence. Family Relations, 36, 87-91.
20. O'Keefe, M. (1998). Factors mediating the link between witnessing interparental violence and dating violence. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 39-57.
21. Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport's cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476.
22. Piliavin, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L, & Clark, R. D., III. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York: Academic Press.
23. Schruijer, S., & Blanz, M. (1994). The group-serving bias in evaluating and explaining harmful behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 47-53.
24. Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M. G., & Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization: An intergroup phenomenon. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
25. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
26. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Wandrei, M. L. (2000). Professional psychologists' conceptualization of intimate partner violence. Psychotherapy, 37, 270-283.
28. Weisz, A. N., & Black, B. M. (2001). Evaluating a sexual assault and dating violence prevention program for urban youths. Social Work Research, 25, 89-102.