One-to-one reactant-modifier interactions in enantio- and diastereoselective hydrogenation of chiral α-hydroxyketones on Pt(111)

Journal of Catalysis

Volumn 237, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 131-142

  Nieminen, Ville ^a   Taskinen, Antti ^b   Toukoniitty, Esa ^a   Hotokka, Matti ^b   Murzin, Dmitry Yu ^a  

^a LABORATORY OF INDUSTRIAL CHEMISTRY AND REACTION ENGINEERING   (Finland)

^b ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Hydroxyketone; DFT; Enantioselective hydrogenation; Force fields; Molecular mechanics

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXATION; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROGENATION; ISOMERS; NITROGEN; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION;

ENANTIOSELECTIVE HYDROGENATION; FORCE FIELDS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS;

KETONES;

EID: 28844463872     PISSN: 00219517     EISSN: 10902694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Y. Orito, S. Imai, and S. Niwa J. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 8 1979 1118
2. M. Sutyinszki, K. Szöri, K. Felflödi, and M. Bartók Catal. Commun. 3 2002 125
3. V.B. Shukla, and P.R. Kulkarni World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 16 2000 499
4. I. Busygin, E. Toukoniitty, R. Leino, and D.Yu. Murzin J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 236 2005 227
5. See for instance review T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker Acc. Chem. Res. 37 2004 909 and references therein
6. D.Yu. Murzin, P. Mäki-Arvela, E. Toukoniitty, and T. Salmi Catal. Rev. 47 2005 175
7. C. Exner, A. Pfaltz, M. Studer, and H.-U. Blaser Adv. Synth. Catal. 345 2003 1253
8. E. Toukoniitty, I. Busygin, R. Leino, and D.Yu. Murzin J. Catal. 227 2004 210
9. A. Bakos, S. Szabo, M. Bartók, and E. Kálmán J. Electroanal. Chem. 532 2002 113
10. A. Vargas, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 226 2004 69
11. O. Schwalm, B. Minder, J. Weber, and A. Baiker Catal. Lett. 23 1994 271
12. E. Toukoniitty, V. Nieminen, A. Taskinen, J. Päivärinta, M. Hotokka, and D.Yu. Murzin J. Catal. 224 2004 326
13. I.C. Lee, and R.I. Masel J. Phys. Chem. B 106 2002 3902
14. A. Vargas, D. Ferri, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 236 2005 1
15. T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 1998 12920
16. D. Ferri, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999 1305
17. A. Taskinen, V. Nieminen, E. Toukoniitty, D.Yu. Murzin, and M. Hotokka Tetrahedron 61 2005 8109
18. A. Vargas, T. Bürgi, M. von Arx, R. Hess, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 209 2002 489
19. M. Maris, T. Bürgi, T. Mallat, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 226 2004 393
20. R. Hess, A. Vargas, T. Mallat, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 222 2004 117
21. W.-R. Huck, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 200 2001 171
22. K. Borszeky, T. Bürgi, Z. Zhaohui, T. Mallat, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 187 1999 160
23. O.J. Sonderegger, G.M.-W. Ho, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 229 2005 19
24. M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, G.E. Scuseria, M.A. Robb, J.R. Cheeseman, V.G. Zakrzewski, J.A. Montgomery, Jr., R.E. Stratmann, J.C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J.M. Millam, A.D. Daniels, K.N. Kudin, M.C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G.A. Petersson, P.Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, N. Rega, P. Salvador, J.J. Dannenberg, D.K. Malick, A.D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J.B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J.V. Ortiz, A.G. Baboul, B.B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R.L. Martin, D.J. Fox, T. Keith, M.A. Al-Laham, C.Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P.M.W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M.W. Wong, J.L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E.S. Replogle, J.A. Pople, GAUSSIAN98, Revision A.11.3, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2002
25. A.D. Becke Phys. Rev. A 38 1988 3098
26. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R.G. Parr Phys. Rev. B 37 1988 785
27. A.D. Becke J. Chem. Phys. 98 1993 5648
28. R. Ahlrichs, M. Bär, M. Häser, H. Horn, and C. Kölmel Chem. Phys. Lett. 162 1989 165
29. M. Häser, and R. Ahlrichs J. Comput. Chem. 19 1989 1746
30. M. von Arnim, and R. Ahlrichs J. Comput. Chem. 19 1998 1746
31. O. Treutler, and R. Ahlrichs J. Chem. Phys. 102 1995 346
32. A. Schäfer, C. Huber, and R. Ahlrichs J. Chem. Phys. 100 1994 5829
33. According to Turbomole Version 5 Users's Manual (26th November 2004) the quality of the TZVP basis set is slightly better than 6-311G**/
34. A. Taskinen, E. Toukoniitty, V. Nieminen, D.Yu. Murzin, and M. Hotokka Catal. Today 100 2005 373
35. T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 194 2000 445
36. C.J. Cramer Essentials of Computation Chemistry - Theories and Models 2002 Wiley Chichester
37. T. Kar, J. Ángyán, and A.B. Shannigrahi J. Phys. Chem. A 104 2000 9953
38. R. Stowasser, and R. Hoffmann J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 1999 3414
39. O. Schwalm, J. Weber, B. Minder, and A. Baiker J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 330 1995 353
40. K.E. Simmons, P.A. Meheux, S.P. Griffiths, I.M. Sutherland, P. Johnston, P.B. Wells, A.F. Carley, M.K. Rajumon, M.W. Roberts, and A. Ibbotson Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 113 1994 465
41. M. Schürch, O. Schwalm, T. Mallat, J. Weber, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 169 1997 275
42. J.L. Margitfalvi, and E. Tfirst J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 139 1999 81
43. J.L. Margitfalvi, E. Tálas, E. Tfirst, C.V. Kumar, and A. Gergely Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 191 2000 177
44. X. Zuo, H. Liu, D. Guo, and X. Yang Tetrahedron 55 1997 7787
45. G. Vayner, K.N. Houk, and Y.-K. Sun J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 2004 199
46. S. Calvo, R.J. LeBlanc, C.T. Williams, and P.B. Balbuena Surf. Sci. 563 2004 57
47. H. Sun J. Phys. Chem. B 102 1998 7338
48. A.K. Rappe, and W.A. Goddard J. Phys. Chem. 95 1991 3358
49. While optimizing the geometries of few test complexes, the results were the closest to the DFT optimized ones when using charges obtained by Qeq. The charge fractions of the modifier and substrate were corresponding to those obtained by Mulliken charges. Another methods were tried as well. For instance, for the substrates and the protonated modifier point charge models were derived from the charges obtained by fitting their electrostatic potential (ESP). ESP fit was obtained by Gaussian98 program with the B3LYP functional and TZVP basis set by Godbout (N. Godbout, D.R. Salahub, J. Andzelm, E. Wimmer, Can. J. Chem. 70 (1992) 560.) from the minimum energy geometries on the potential energy surface. Although the charges were very close to those obtained by Qeq, the optimized geometries by force field using a point-charge model derived based on the ESP fit did not always correspond to DFT optimized structures.
50. M. Sayes, M.-F. Reyniers, G.B. Marin, and M. Neurock J. Phys. Chem. B 106 2002 7489
51. A.H. Fuchs, and A.K. Cheetham J. Phys. Chem. B 105 2001 7375
52. D. Ferri, and T. Bürgi J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 2001 12074
53. A. Vargas, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Catal. 222 2004 439
54. K. Borszeky, T. Mallat, and A. Baiker Tetrahedron: Asym. 8 1997 3745
55. G. Szöllosi, S.-I. Niwa, T.-A. Hanaoka, and F. Mizukami J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 230 2005 91
56. D. Ferri, T. Bürgi, and A. Baiker J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000 437
57. E. Toukoniitty, P. Mäki-Arvela, V. Nieminen, M. Hotokka, J. Päivärinta, T. Salmi, and D.Yu. Murzin Catalysis of Organic Reactions 2002 Decker New York pp. 341-348
58. M. von Arx, T. Bürgi, T. Mallat, and A. Baiker Chem. Eur. J. 8 2002 1430
59. M. von Arx, M. Wahl, T.A. Jung, and A. Baiker Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 2005 273
60. S. Lavoie, and P.H. McBreen J. Phys. Chem. B 109 2005 11986
61. N. Bonalumi, A. Vargas, D. Ferri, T. Bürgi, T. Mallat, and A. Baiker J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 2005 8467