Legal Aspects of the Web

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Borrull, Alexandre López ^a,b   Oppenheim, Charles ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c Chrtd Inst of Lib Info Prof

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747523466     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.1440380111     Document Type: Review

References (329)

1. Adams, W. A. (2001). Intellectual property infringement in global networks: The implications of protection ahead of the curve. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 10(1), 71-131.
2. Aharonian, G. (1999). Does the Patent Office respect the software community? IEEE Software, 16(4), 87-89.
3. Akdeniz, Y., Walker, C., & Wall, D. (2000). The Internet, law and society. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
4. Albanese, A. (2000a, October 2). Digital copyright goes to court. Publishers Weekly, 247, 48-49.
5. Albanese, A. (2000b, August 21). Napster: It's not just for music. Publishers Weekly, 247, 35-36.
6. Allbon, E., & Williams, P. (2002). Nasties in the net: Children and censorship on the Web. New Library World, 103(1,2), 30-38.
7. Amadei, X. (2001). Standards of liability for Internet service providers: A comparative study of France and the United States with a specific focus on copyright, defamation, and illicit content. Cornell International Law Journal, 35(1), 189-229.
8. Anderson, B. (2001). Fair use, copyright law and digitized works. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, 20(1), 111-114.
9. Anderson, S. (1997). Copyright and digital reproduction in cyberspace. Information Outlook, 1(6), 14.
10. Anestopoulou, M. (2001). Challenging intellectual property law in the Internet: An overview of the legal implications of the MP3 technology. Information and Communications Technology Law, 10(3), 319-337.
11. Ardito, S. C. (2001). The new Internet filtering legislation. Information Today, 18(6), 14-16.
12. Arms, W. Y., Adkins, R., Ammen, C., & Hayes, A. (2001). Collecting and preserving the Web: The Minerva Prototype. RLG Diginews, 5(2). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.reg.org/preserv/diginews5-2.html#feature1
13. Arthur, C. (2001, November 8). Huge increase in music swaps over the Net despite demise of Napster. The Independent, p. 15. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?dir=1&story =103811&host=1&printable=1
14. Arvidson, A., & Lettenstrom, F. (1998). The Kulturarw Project: the Swedish Royal Web Archive. Electronic Library, 16(2), 105-108.
15. Arvidson, A., Persson, K., & Mannerheim, J. (2000, August). The Kulturarw3 Project - The Royal Swedish Web Archiw3e - An example of "complete" collection of Web pages. Paper presented at the 66th IFLA Council and General Conference, Jerusalem, Israel. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla66/papers/154-157e.html
16. Association of American Publishers (2000). Digital rights management for e-books: Publisher requirements. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from htttp://www.publishers.org/digital/drm.pdf
17. Athanasekou, P. E. (1998). Internet and copyright: An introduction to caching, linking and framing. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/wip/98_2atha/default.htm
18. Azmi, I. M. (2000). Domain names and Cyberspace: The application of old norms to new problems. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 8(2), 193-213.
19. Balas, J. (1998). Copyright in the digital era. Computers in Libraries, 18(6), 38-40.
20. Balkin, J. M., Noveck, B. S., & Roosevelt, K. (2000). Filtering the Internet: A best practice model. In J. Walterman & M. Machill (Eds.), Protecting our children on the Internet: Towards a new culture of responsibility (pp. 199-262). Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Foundation.
21. Barlow, J. P. (1996). Selling wine without bottles: The economy of the mind on the global net. In P. B. Hugenholtz (Ed.), The future of copyright in a digital environment (pp. 169-188). The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
22. Barlow, J. P. (2000). The next economy of ideas. Will copyright survive the Napster bomb? Nope, but creativity will. Wired, 8(10), 240-242, 252.
23. Bastian, J. A. (1997), Filtering the Internet in American public libraries: Sliding down the slippery slope. FirstMonday. 2(10). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2_10/bastian
24. Bebbington, L. W. (2002). Review of the book The legal and regulatory environment for electronic information. UKOLUG Newsletter, 13(2), 35-36.
25. Beresford, K. (2001). European patents for software, e-commerce and business model inventions. World Patent Information, 23(3), 253-263.
26. Bessen, J., & Maskin, E. (2000). Sequential innovation, patents, and imitation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27. Bide, M., Oppenheim, C., & Ramsden, A. (1997). Copyright clearance and digitisation in UK higher education: Supporting study for JISC/PA clearance mechanisms working party. Retrieved 31 July, 2002, from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/pa
28. Bobicki, J. (1999). Internet filtering issues in schools. Colorado Libraries, 25(3), 27-29.
29. Boeri, R. J. (2001, July). Please keep your ticket: Protecting content and property. EMedia, 14, 50.
30. Bond, R. (1999). Links, frames, meta-tags and trolls. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 13(3), 317-323.
31. Brinson, J. D. (2000). Internet law and business handbook. Menlo Park, CA: Ladera Press.
32. Brinson, J. D. (2001). Analyzing e-commerce & Internet law. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Brophy, P., Craven, J., & Fisher, S. (1999). Extremism and the Internet. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University.
34. Brunessaux, S., Isidore, O., Kahl, S., Ferlias, G., & Rotta Soares, A. L. (2001). Report on currently available COTS filtering tools (D2.2). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from the Netprotect Project Web site: http://www.saferinternet.org/downloads/netprotect_review_tods.pdf
35. Bruwelheide, J. H. (1997). Copyright and distance education. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 21(1), 41-52.
36. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002). Retrieved July 30, 2002, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/220/boai.html
37. Burk, D. L. (1997). Jurisdiction in a world without borders. Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 1(3). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://vjolt.student.irginia.edu/graphics/voll/voll_art3.html
38. Burk, D. L., & Cohen, J. E. (2001). Fair use infrastructure for rights management systems. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 15, 41-83.
39. Byrne, J. (1998). Squeezing spam off the net: Federal regulation of unsolicited commercial e-mail West Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 1(4). Retrieved August, 2002, from http://www.wvu.edu/̃wvjolt/Arch/Byrne/Byrne.htm
40. Carey, M., & Wall, D. (2001). MP3: The beat bytes back. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 15(1), 35-58.
41. Carver, D. A. (1998). Sex, the network, and academic libraries. OLA Quarterly, 3, 11-12.
42. Case, M. M. (2002). Promoting open access: Developing new strategies for managing copyright and intellectual property. Retrieved July 30, 2002, from http://www.arl.org/newsltr/220/access.html
43. Casey, T. D. (2000). ISP liability survival guide: Strategies for managing copyright, spam, cache and privacy regulations. New York: Wiley.
44. Cate, F. H. (1998). The First Amendment, children, the Internet, and America's public libraries. Indiana Libraries, 17, 42-52.
45. Cathro, W., Webb, C., & Whiting, J. (2001, June). Archiving the Web: The Pandora Archive at the National Library of Australia. Paper presented at the Preserving the Present for the Future Web Archiving Conference, Copenhagen.
46. Caywood, C. (2001). The Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA). Teacher Librarian: The Journal for School Library Professionals, 28(5), 53-57.
47. Chancey, M. E. (1999). Meta-tags and hypertext deep linking: How the essential components of web-authoring and internet guidance are strengthening intellectual property rights on the World Wide Web. Stetson Law Review, 29, 203-235.
48. Chatterjee, B. (2000). Cyberpornography, cyberidentities and law. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 14(1), 89-93.
49. Cherry, B. (2000). Will libraries want their MP3? Library Journal (Net Connect Spring Supplement), 125, 8-9.
50. Chiku, K. (2001). Copyright in digital age. Bulletin of the Japan Special Libraries Association, 187, 1-5.
51. Chudnov, D. (2000). Docster: The future of document delivery? Library Journal, 125(15), 60-62.
52. Citing free speech concerns, groups call for hearings on Internet domain names. (2001). Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom, 50, 83.
53. Clankie, S. M. (2001). Domain names, cybersquatters, and the law: Who's to blame? Journal of Information Ethics, 10(1), 27-34.
54. Clark, C. (1996). The answer to the machine is in the machine. In P. B. Hugenholtz (Ed.), The future of copyright in a digital environment (pp. 139-146). The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
55. Clark, C. (2000). The tortuous journey to Netlaw: A layman's guide. Logos, 11, 79-85.
56. Clarke, R. (2001, January). DRM will beget DCRM. Paper presented at the W3C DRM Workshop, Sophia Antipolis, France.
57. Clarke, R., & Dempsey, G. (1999, April). Electronic Trading in Copyright Objects and Its Implications for Universities. Paper presented at the Australian EDUCAUSE '99 Conference, Sydney. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.anu.edu.au/people/RogerClarke/EC/ETCU.html
58. Clayton, R. (2000). Judge & jury? How "notice and take down" gives ISPs an unwanted role in applying the law to the Internet. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http.//www.cl.cam.ac.uk/̃rncl/Judge_and_Jury.html
59. Clement, E., & Oppenheim, C. (2002). Anarchism, alternative publishers and copyright. Anarchist Studies, 10(1), 41-69.
60. Cohen, J. E. (1999). WIPO copyright treaty implementation in the United States: Will fair use survive? European Intellectual Property Review, 21(5), 236-247.
61. Collins, M. (2001). The law of defamation and the Internet. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
62. Cooper, H. M. (1997). Jurisdictional trends in Cyberspace. Stetson Law Forum, 1(1). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.law.stetson.edu/lawforum/back/fall97/cooper.htm
63. Cope, B., & Freeman, R. (2001). Digital rights management and content development. Altona, Australia: Common Ground Publishing.
64. Cornish, G. (1998). Copyright and document delivery in the electronic environment. Interlending & Document Supply, 26(3), 123-129.
65. Cox, J. (1999). Generic standard licences: Cooperation or competition? Serials, 12(3), 283-287.
66. Cranor, L. F., & LaMacchia, B. A. (1998). Spam! Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 74-83.
67. Crawford, G. A. (1999). Libraries, the Internet, and filters. Information Management, 12(3/4), 15-16.
68. Crews, K. D., & Buttler, D. K. (Eds.) (1999). Perspectives on copyright and fairuse guidelines for education and libraries [Special issue]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(14).
69. Cronin, B., & Davenport, E. (2001). E-rogenous zones: Positioning pornography in the digital economy. The Information Society, 17(1), 33-48.
70. Crosbie, V. (2002, July 16). Who owns your hyperlinks? ClickZ Today. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.clickz.com/design/freefee/article.php/1404841
71. Cruquenaire, A. (2001). Electronic agents as search engines: Copyright related aspects. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 9(3), 327-343.
72. Davis, D. M., & Lafferty, T. (2002). Digital rights management: Implications for libraries. The Bottom Line: Managing Library Finances, 15(1), 18-23.
73. Delio, M. (2002, April 18). Deep links return to surface. Wired News. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1294,51887,00.html
74. Deturbide, M. (2000). Liability of Internet service providers for defamation in the US and Britain: Same competing interests, different responses. Journal of Information, Law and Technology. 2000(3). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://elj.warwirck.ac.uk/jilt/00-3/deturbide.html
75. Deutsch, A. (2000). Concealed information in Web pages: Metataga and US trademark law. IIC-International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, 31(7-8), 845-885.
76. Dickinson, Q. T. (2001), E-commerce, business method patents, and the USPTO: An old debate for a new economy. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 19, 389-403.
77. Digital rights management: Unlocking the value of content. (2000). London: Electronic Publishing Services Ltd.
78. DiMatteo, L. A. (2002). E-commerce in the digital millennium: The legal ramifications of the DMCA and business method patents: The new "problem" of business method patents: The convergence of national patent laws and international Internet transactions. Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal, 28, 218-262.
79. Diotalevi, R. N. (1998, Spring). Copyrighting Cyberspace: Unweaving a Tangled Web. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www2.smu.edu/csr/ Spring98-3-Diotalevi.pdf
80. Does online music distribution drive sales? (2000). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.bizreport.com/ebiz/2000/06/20000620-1.htm
81. Dotseth, K. A., & Hillard, J. J. (2002). Intellectual property in an information economy: Sailing uncharted waters: Insurance coverage for intellectual property disputes arising from the Internet. William Mitchell Law Review, 28, 1125.
82. Drahos, P. (1996). A philosophy of intellectual property. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
83. Drake, W., Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. C. (2000, October). Dictatorships in the digital age: Some considerations on the Internet in China and Cuba. Information Impacts Magazine. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.cisp.org/imp/october_2000/10_00drake.htm
84. Dunaevsky, Y. (2002). Don't confuse metatags with initial interest confusion. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 29, 1349-1386.
85. Durell, K. L. (2000). Intellectual property protection for computer software: How much and what form is effective? International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 8(3), 231-262.
86. Durno, J. (2001). Distributed file sharing and libraries. Feliciter, 47, 22-24.
87. Ebbinghouse, C. (1998a). Call to action: Legislation affecting information professionals. Searcher, 6(6), 56-61.
88. Ebbinghouse, C. (1998b). Webmaster liability: Look before you link, and other admonitions for today's Webmaster. Searcher, 6(2), 19-27.
89. Einhorn, M. (2002). Digital rights management and access protection: An economic analysis. Retrieved July 30, 2002, from http://www.law.columbia.edu/conferences/2001/1_program_en.htm
90. Eisenschitz, T., & Turner, P. (1997). Rights and responsibilities in the digital age: Problems with stronger copyright in an information society. Journal of Information Science, 23(3), 209-223.
91. Eko, L. (2001). Many spiders, one Worldwide Web: Towards a typology of Internet regulation. Communication Law & Policy, 6, 445-484.
92. Elgison, M. J. J., & Jordan, J.M. III. (1997). Trademark cases arise from metatags, frames: Disputes involve search-engine indexes, Web sites within Web sites, as well as hyperlinking. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/metaschool/fisher/linking/framing/mixed1.html
93. Eres, B. K. (1989). International information issues. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 3-32.
94. Erickson, J. S. (2001a). A digital object approach to interoperable rights management: Fine-grained policy enforcement enabled by a digital object infrastructure. D-Lib Magazine, 7(6). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/erickson/06erickson.html
95. Erickson, J. S. (2001b). Information objects and rights management: a mediation-based approach to DRM interoperability. D-Lib Magazine, 7(4). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/erickson/04erickson.html
96. European Commission. Directorate General for the Internal Market. (2000). The patentability of computer-implemented inventions [consultation paper]. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://europa.eu.int/comm./internal_market/en/indprop/comp/soften.pdf
97. European Parliament (2000). Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (Directive on electronic commerce). Brussels, Belgium: European Parliament. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/ecommerce/legal/documents/2000_3ec/2000_31ec_en.pdf
98. Feldman, T. (2001). The impact of peer to peer on 21st century publishing (EPS Monthly Briefing Paper). London: Electronic Publishing Services.
99. Fong, J. G. (1999). Digital libraries and copyright related issues. ICSTI Forum, 31. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.icsti.org/forum/31/#fong
100. Fox, E. A., & Urs, S. (2002), Digital libraries. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 503-589.
101. Frazier, K. (1999). What's wrong with fair-use guidelines for the academic community? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1320-1323.
102. Freedman, C. D. (2000a). The protection of computer software in copyright and the law of confidence: Improper decompilation and employee-poaching. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 8(1), 25-47.
103. Freedman, C. D. (2000b). Software and computer-related business-method inventions: Must Europe adopt American patent culture? International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 5(3), 285-309.
104. Freiburger, G. A., Bauchspies, R., & Sharp, A. (2000). Docster redux: Librarians respond. Library Journal, 125, 38-39.
105. Froomkin, A. M. (1999). A Commentary on WIPO's The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues. Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://personal.law.miami.edu/̃amf/commentary.htm
106. Froomkin, A. M. (2000). Wrong turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to route around the APA and the constitution. Duke Law Journal, 50(1), 17-186.
107. Froomkin, A. M. (2001). The collision of trademarks, domain names, and due process in Cyberspace. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 91-97.
108. Gadd, E. (2002). Clearing the way: Copyright clearance in UK libraries. Loughborough, UK: Library & Information Statistics Unit.
109. Gardrat, A. (1998). Another look at European Internet law. Media Law & Policy, 7(1). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.cmcnyls.edu/MLP/ gardrf98.htm
110. Garrote, I. (1999). The linking law of the World Wide Web. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.uam.es/centros/derecho/publicaciones/pe/indices.html
111. Gasaway, L. N. (1998). Copyright, the Internet, and other legal issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1003-1009.
112. Gasaway, L. N. (1999a). Digital Millennium Copyright Act: A mixed bag. Information Outlook, 3(3), 14, 16.
113. Gasaway, L. N. (1999b). Online service provider liability. Information Outlook, 3(5), 54-55.
114. Gasaway, L. N. (2000a). Does deep linking infringe copyright? Information Outlook, 4(9), 41-42.
115. Gasaway, L. N. (2000b). MP3 and Napster controversies. Information Outlook, 4, 44-45.
116. Gauthronet, S., & Drouard, E. (2001). Unsolicited commercial communications and data protection. Brussels, Belgium: Commission of the European Communities, Internal Market Directorate General. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/dataprot/studies/spamstudyen.pdf
117. Geist, M. A. (2001). Is there a there there? Toward a greater certainty for Internet jurisdiction. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16, 1345-1407.
118. Geller, P. E. (1996). Conflicts of law in Cyberspace: International copyright in a digitally networked world. In P. B. Hugenholtz (Ed.), The future of copyright in a digital environment (pp. 27-48). The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law.
119. Gilbey, C. (2000). MP3 and the infinite digital jukebox. London: Turnaround.
120. Gladstone, J. A. (2001a). Why business method patents are the epitome of misdirection: Strong intellectual property rights do not encourage innovation in information technology. La Revue. The Edhec Journal of Law, New Technology and Best Legal Practices, 1(1). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://legal.edhec.com/Revue/Numero_l/Dossier/Dossier1_1.htm
121. Gladstone, J. A. (2001b, April). Why patenting information technology and business methods is not sound policy: Lessons from history and prophecies for the future. Paper presented at the 16th BILETA Annual Conference. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.bileta.ac.uk/01papers/Gladstone.html
122. Goldstein, M. P. (2000). Service provider liability for acts committed by users: What you don't know can hurt you. John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law, 18, 591.
123. Goodger, B. (1997). Internet and domain names: Recent UK cases. Computers and Law, 8(3), 33-35.
124. Gordon, L. (2001). The Internet marketplace and digital rights management. Retrieved July 30, 2002, from http://www.itl.nist.gov/div895/docs/GLyonDRMWhitepaper.pdf
125. Gregory, V. L. (1998, November). Copyright and licensing issues for the digital library. Paper presented at the Internet Librarian conference, Monterey, California.
126. Gregory, V. L. (2001). UCITA: What does it mean for libraries? Online, 25(1), 30-32, 34.
127. Griffith, C. (1998). Fair use and free speech on the Web. Information Today, 15(1), 18, 55.
128. Gringras, C. (1997). The laws of the Internet. London: Butterworths.
129. Guthrie, L. S. (1997). Copyright and document delivery. Information Outlook, 1(1), 39.
130. Hacker, S. (2000). MP3: The definitive guide. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly.
131. Hadley, M. (1998). The Gertz doctrine and Internet defamation. Virginia Law Review, 84(3), 477-508.
132. Hamdani, A. (2002). Who's liable for cyberwrongs? Cornell Law Review, 87, 901-957.
133. Hancock, D. (2001). An Assessment of ICANN's Mandatory Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy in Resolving Disputes Over Domain Names. Retrieved July31, 2002, from http://elJ.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-3/hancock.html
134. Hapel, R. (1999). On censorship and the Internet in Danish public libraries. Multimedia Information and Technology. 25(4), 333-334.
135. Hardy, R., Oppenheim, C., & Rubbert, I. (2002). PELICAN. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresearch/pelican/indexpage.html
136. Harnad, S. (1999). Free at last: The future of peer-reviewed journals. D-Lib Magazine, 5(12). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12harnad.html
137. Harnad, S. (2000, April). The invisible hand of peer review. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/̃harnad/nature2.html
138. Harnad, S. (2001a). For whom the gate tolls? Retrieved July 16, 2002, from http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/̃harnad/Tp/resolution.htm
139. Harnad, S. (2001b). The self-archiving initiative: Freeing the refereed researchliterature online. Nature, 410, 1024-1025.
140. Harris, K. (2002). Finally some sensible European legislation on software. Computers and Law, 13(2), 29-30.
141. Harris, L. E. (2001). Prospects for a single international copyright law. Art Libraries Journal, 26(4), 22-23.
142. Harris, L. E. (2002). Licensing digital content: A practical guide for librarians. Chicago: American Library Association.
143. Hawkins, D. T. (1998). Digital watermarking: Intellectual property protection for the Internet? Online, 22, 91-93.
144. Helfer, L. R., & Dinwoodie, G. B. (2001). Designing non-national systems: The case of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. William and Mary Law Review, 43, 141-274.
145. Henderson, C. C. (1998). Libraries as creatures of copyright: Why librarians care about intellectual property law and policy. Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://copyright.ala.org/creatures.html and http://www.ala.org/washoff/copy lib.pdf
146. Henderson, K., & Kane, H. (2001). Internet patents: Will they hinder the development of e-commerce? Retrieved August 1, 2002, from: http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-l/henderson.html
147. HERON: Higher Education Resources On Demand (2002). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.heron.ac.uk
148. Hestermeyer, H. P. (2002). The Invalidity of ICANN's UDRP under national law. Minnesota Intellectual Property Review, 3, 1-57.
149. Hinde, S. (2000). Smurfing, swamping, spamming, spoofing, squatting, slandering, surfing, scamming and other mischiefs of the World Wide Web. Computers & Security, 19(4), 312-320.
150. Hirst, M. (2002). Cyberobscenity and the ambit of English criminal law. Computers and Law, 13(2), 25-28.
151. Hitchcock, S., Carr, L., Jiao, Z., Bergmark, D., Hall, W., Lagoze, C., & Harnad, S. (1999). Developing services for open eprint archives: globalisation, integration and the impact of links. Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, 143-151.
152. Hu, H. (1998). Introducing the Copyright Permission Pages Web site. Information Outlook, 2(7), 42.
153. Hugenholtz, P. B. (1996). The future of copyright in the digital environment. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
154. Iannella, R. (2001). Digital rights management (DRM) architectures. D-Lib Magazine, 7(6). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/iannella/06iannella.html
155. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (2002). The IFLA Internet manifesto. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.ifla.org/misc/im-e.html
156. Jaccard, M. A. (1997). Securing copyright in transnational Cyberspace: The case for contracting with potential infringers. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 35(3), 619-662.
157. Jacsó, P. (2000, July/August). Music anywhere and everywhere. Information Today, 17, 28.
158. Jasion, J. T. (1991). The International guide to legal deposit. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
159. Jeffery, I. (2002). Don't always believe what you Reed. Computers and Law, 13(2), 31-32.
160. Jenkins, P. (2001). Beyond tolerance: Child pornography on the Internet. New York: New York University Press.
161. Jennings, C. A. (2002). Fair use on the Internet. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 12 July, 2002, from http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31423.pdf
162. Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. G. (1997). The rise of law on the global network. In B. Kahin & C. R. Nesson (Eds.), Borders in Cyberspace (pp. 3-47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
163. Johnson, R. (2000). The EU's telematics for libraries programme: An assessment. Information Services and Use, 20(1), 25-30.
164. Johnson, S. T. (2001). Internet domain name and trademark disputes: Shifting paradigm in intellectual property. Arizona Law Review, 43, 465-489.
165. Jones, R. (1999). Legal pluralism and the adjudication of Internet disputes.International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 13(1), 49-67.
166. Khong, W. K. (2001, November). Spam law for the Internet. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-3/khong.html
167. Kingston, P., Gadd, E., & Goodman, R. (1997). Developing and evaluating an electronic "short loan" collection in a university library. International Journal of Electronic Library Research, 1(2), 95-118.
168. Kiritsov, S. (2000). Can millions of internet users be breaking the law every day? An intellectual property analysis of linking and framing and the need for licensing. Stanford Technology Law Review. Retrieved October 26, 2002, from http://stlr.stanford.edu/STLR/Events/linking/index.htm
169. Kleinwachter, W. (2000). ICANN between technical mandate and political challenges. Telecommunications Policy, 24(6), 553-563.
170. Klinefelter, A. (2001). Copyright and electronic library resources: An overview of how the law is affecting traditional library services. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 19(3/4), 175-193.
171. Koehler, W. (2000). I think ICANN: Climbing the Internet regulation mountain. Searcher, 8(3), 48-53.
172. Koehler, W. (2001). Dot-lib for libraries - can it happen?: Ask ICANN. Searcher, 9(4), 66-67.
173. Kucala, J. T. (2001). Putting the meat back in meta-tagsl University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 1, 129-161.
174. Kuester, J. R., & Nieves, P. A. (1998). Hyperlinks, frames and meta-tags: An intellectual property analysis. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 38, 243-279.
175. Kuester, J. R., & Thompson, L. E. (2001). Risks associated with restricting business method and e-commerce patents. Georgia State University Law Review, 17, 657.
176. Kumik, P. (2001). Digital rights management. Legal Information Management, 1(2), 21-23.
177. Lagoze, C., & van de Sompel, H. (2001). The Open Archives Initiative: Building a low-barrier interoperability framework. Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://www.openarchives.org/documents/oai.pdf
178. Lam, C., & Tan, B. (2001). The Internet is changing the music industry. Communications of the ACM, 44(8), 62-68.
179. Latham, J. M. (2001). Positioning the public library in the modern state: The opportunity of the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA). FirstMonday, 6(7). Retrieved April 21, 2003, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue6_7/latham/
180. Lessig, L. (1998, March). The laws of Cyberspace. Paper presented at Taiwan Net, Taipei, Taiwan. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/content/articles/works/laws_cyberspace.pdf
181. Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
182. Lessig, L. (2001). The future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House.
183. Levering, M. (1999). What's right about fair-use guidelines for the academic community? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1313-1319.
184. Levine, D. S. (2001, November 31). One on one with Lawrence Lessig, author. San Francisco Business Times. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://sanfrancisco.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2001/12/03/ newscolumnl0.html
185. Li, J. H. S. (2000). Cyberporn: The controversy. FirstMonday, 5(8). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from the World Wide Web: http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_8/li/index.html
186. Lidsky, L. B. (2000). Silencing John Doe: Defamation and discourse in Cyberspace. Duke Law Journal, 49(4), 855-946.
187. Linking, Framing and Inlining (2002). Nolo legal encyclopedia. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.nolo.com/lawcenter/ency/article.cfm/objectID/ C13F7E6B-B05E-43DF-80D62B635DF9DD9F
188. Lipinski, T. A. (2000). Legal issues in accessing and managing the metadata of digital objects. Technicalities, 20(3), 1, 6-14.
189. Litman, J. (2000). The DNS wars: Trademarks and the Internet domain name system. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.law.wayne.edu/litman/papers/DNSwars.pdf
190. Lloyd, I. J. (2000). Information technology law. London: Butterworths.
191. Lowry, C. B. (2001). Fair use and digital publishing: An academic librarian's perspective. Portal, 1(2), 191-196.
192. Luftman, D. B. (1997). Defamation liability for on-line services: The sky is not falling. George Washington Law Review, 65(6), 1071-1099.
193. Lunney, G. S. (2001). The death of copyright: Digital technology, private copying and the DMCA. Virginia Law Review, 87, 813-919.
194. Lutzker, A. P. (1999). Primer on the Digital Millennium Act and the Copyright Term Extension Act and what they mean for the library community. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.arl.org/info/frn/copy/primer.html
195. Lynch, C. A. (2001). Metadata harvesting and the Open Access Initiative. ARL Bimontly Report (217), 1-9.
196. Lyon, E., & Maslin, J. (1997). Audio and video on-demand for the performing arts: Project Patron. International Journal of Electronic Library Research, 1(2), 119-132.
197. Macdonald, S. (1998). Information for innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
198. Mackenzie, R. (1998). "WWW": World Wide Web or Wild Wild West? Fixing the fenceposts on the final frontier: Domain names, intellectual property paradigms and current disputes over the governance of the Internet. Information and Communications Technology Law, 7(2), 103-116.
199. Mahon, B. (2000). The intellectual property industries and the new tech world. Business Information Review, 17(4), 185-190.
200. Managing digital rights in online publishing. (2001). Information Management and Technology, 34(4), 168-169.
201. Mannerheim, J. (2000, August). The WWW and our digital heritage: The new preservation tasks of the library community. Paper presented at the 66th IFLA Council and General Conference, Jerusalem, Israel.
202. Marcum, D. (2000, January). State of legal deposit legislation. Paper presented at the ICSTI Workshop on Digital Archiving, UNESCO House, Paris.
203. Marett, P. (2002). Private interests and public interest. Library Association Record, 104(2), 111-112.
204. Margiano, R. (1999, October). The Ninth Circuit holds that Internet domain name e-mail and Web service provider is not a cybersquatter for trademark dilution purposes, Avery Dennison Corp. v. Sumpton. Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/99-3/margiano.html
205. Marley, J. L. (1999). Guidelines favoring fair use: An analysis of legal interpretations affecting higher education. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(5), 367-371.
206. Martin, B. (1998). Information liberation. London: Freedom Press.
207. Martin, B. (2000). Defamation havens. FirstMonday, 5(3). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue5_3/martin
208. Martin, E. (2001). Management of networked electronic publications: A table of status in various countries. Ottawa, Canada: National Library of Canada.
209. Matthews, M. (2000). Patently absurd. Personal Computer World, 23(1), 130-134.
210. Melamut, S. J., Thibodeau, P. L., & Albright, E. D. (2000). Fair use or not fair use: That is the electronic reserves question. Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery and Information Supply, 11(1), 3-28.
211. Menthe, D. (1998). Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: A theory of international spaces. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.mttlr.org/volfour/menthe.html
212. Mezrich, J. L. (1998, Summer). Extension of copyright to fonts: Can the alphabet be far behind? Computer Law Review and Technology Journal, 61-67.
213. Millar, S. (2002, February 8). Music firms losing digital piracy fight. The Guardian, 11.
214. Miller, L., Peters, K., Pappano, M., & Manuel, K. (1999). A research review for librarians working with electronic serials and licensing agreements in the age of the Internet and distance education. Bottom Line, 12(3), 113-119.
215. Minkel, W. (2000). Who owns e-information? School Library Journal, 46, 43.
216. Minow, M. (2001, May). Library copyright liability and pirating patrons... and what you can do about it. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.cla-net.org/pubs/Minow_copyright.html
217. Mirchin, D. (1998). Can you be legally liable for hypertext linking? New York: Silver Platter Information. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.silverplatter.com/hypertext.html
218. Model NESLI site licence (2002). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://www.nesli.ac.uk/modellicence8b.html
219. Mody, S. S. (2001). National Cyberspace regulation: Unbundling the concept of jurisdiction. Stanford Journal of International Law, 37(2), 365-390.
220. Mooney, S. (2001). Interoperability. Digital rights management and the emerging ebook environment. D-Lib Magazine, 7(1). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january01/mooney/01mooney.html
221. Moorefield, G. S. (1999). SPAM - It's not just for breakfast anymore: Federal legislation and the fight to free the Internet from unsolicited commercial e-mail. Journal of Science & Technology Law 5(10). Retrieved August, 2002, from http://www.bu.edu/law/scitech/volume5/5bujstl10.pdf
222. Morgan, C. D. (2001). Risky business: Liability for obscenity and pornography in providing Internet access in the library. Library Administration and Management, 15(1), 17-19.
223. Morrison, A. (1999). Hijack on the road to Xanadu: The infingement (sic) of copyright in HTML documents via networked computers and the legitimacy of browsing hypermedia, documents. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://elj. warwick.ac.uk/jilt/99-l/morrison.html
224. Mtima, L. (1998). Trademarks, copyright and the Internet. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property/domain/matjuris.html
225. Mueller, M. L. (1997, October). Internet domain names: Privatization, competition, and freedom of expression. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.cato.org/pubs/briefs/bp-033.html
226. Muir, A. (1998). Publishers' views of electronic short-loan collections and copyright clearance issues. Journal of Information Science, 24(4), 215-229.
227. Muir, A. (2001). Legal deposit and preservation of digital publications: A review of research and development activity. Journal of Documentation, 57(5), 652-682.
228. Murray, A. D. (1998). Internet domain names: The trade mark challenge. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 6(3), 285-312.
229. Murray, A. D. (2000). The use of trade marks as meta tags: Defining the boundaries. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 8(3), 263-284.
230. Nathenson, I. S. (1998). Internet infoglut and invisible ink: Spamdexing search engines with meta-tags. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 12. Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/12HarvJLTech43.pdf
231. Norman, S. (2001). What's your (current copyright) problem? Legal Information Management, 1(2), 14-15.
232. Ojala, M. P. (2000a). The business of domain names. Online, 24(3), 78-80.
233. Ojala, M. P. (2000b). Peering at EContent. EContent, 23(6), 6.
234. Ojala, M. P. (2001). Entering the content space: Carry your lawyer at all times. EContent, 24(1), 30-34.
235. Okerson, A. (2001). Standard license agreement. Retrieved 30 July, 2002, from http://www.library.yale.edu/̃llicense/standlicagree.html
236. O'Leary, M. (2001). DRM emerging as must-have content solution, EContent, 24(1), 68-69.
237. Oppenheim, C. (1996). The British legal background to ECMS. In B. Tuck (Ed.), Electronic copyright management systems (pp. 49-56). London: South Bank University.
238. Oppenheim, C. (1997, October). The legal deposit of non-print publications. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/legdep/97_3opp/default.htm
239. Oppenheim, C. (1998). LISLEX: Legal issues of concern to the library and information sector. Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 437-443.
240. Oppenheim, C. (2000a). Copyright issues in digitisation and the hybrid library. Information Services and Use, 20(4), 203-209.
241. Oppenheim, C. (2000b). Does copyright have any future on the Internet? Journal of Documentation, 56(3), 279-298.
242. Oppenheim, C. (2001a). Directive on copyright and related rights finally approved. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 171-176.
243. Oppenheim, C. (2001b). The legal and regulatory environment for electronic information (4th ed.). Tetbury, UK- Infonortics.
244. Orange, A. (1999, October). Developments in the domain name system: For better or for worse? Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/99-3/orange.html
245. O'Rourke, M. A. (1998). Legal issues on the Internet: Hyperlinking and framing.D-Lib Magazine, 4(4). Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april98/04orourke.html
246. Palfrey, T. (1997). Pornography and the possible criminal liability of Internet service providers under the Obscene Publication(s) and Protection of Children Act. Information and Communications Technology Law, 6(3), 187-199.
247. Pantalony, R. E. (2001). Fair use, fair dealing: Will they survive? Art Libraries Journal, 26(4), 18-21.
248. Parker, D. (2000). Copyrights vs. free speech: DeCSS case may be the first test of the DMCA. EMedia, 13(3), 18.
249. Pascoe, R., & Black, H. M. (2001). Virtual libraries: Long overdue: The Digital Agenda Act and Australian libraries. Australian Library Journal, 50(2), 133-146.
250. Patel, S. K. (2002). Immunizing Internet service providers from third-party Internet defamation claims: How far should courts go? Vanderbilt Law Review, 55(2), 647-691.
251. Pearlman Salow, H. (2000). Liability immunity for Internet service providers: How is it working? The Journal of Technology Law and Policy, 6(1). Retrieved February 25, 2003, from http://dogwood.circa.ufl.edu/̃techlaw/vol6/Pearlman.html
252. Peek, R. (1999, January). Taming the Internet in three acts: The DMCA, ITFA, and COPA have far-reaching implications for the Web. Information Today, 16(1), 28-29.
253. Peek, R. (2002). The great BOAI experiment. Information Today, 19(4), 40.
254. Penfold, C. (2001, July). Nazis, porn and politics: Asserting control over Internet content. Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-2/penfold.html
255. Perritt, H. J. (1997). Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: The role of intermediaries. In C. Neeson (Ed.), Borders in Cyberspace (pp. 164-202). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
256. Perry, G. (1998, Fall). Personal jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Where can you be sued, and whose laws apply? Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.cmcnyls.edu/MLP/perryf98.HTM
257. Phan, D. T. T. (1998). Will fair use function on the Internet? Columbia Law Review, 98(1), 169-216.
258. Phillips, M. (2002). Archiving the Web: The national collection of Australian online publications. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Web Archiving, National Diet Library, Tokyo, Japan.
259. Pike, G. H. (2001). Better watch what you write. Information Today, 18(11), 19-21.
260. Post, D. G. (1999). Governing Cyberspace, or where is James Madison when we need him? Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dposticann/commentl.html
261. Post, D. G. (2002). His Napster's voice. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.temple.edu/lawschool/dpost/HisNapstersVoice.pdf
262. Poynder, R. (2001). Caught in a web: Intellectual property in Cyberspace. London: Derwent.
263. Publishing after copyright: Maintaining control online. (2001). London: Electronic Publishing Services Ltd.
264. Ramasastry, A. (2002). The Constitution and spam: Is there a First Amendment right to send unsolicited faxes and e-mail? Retrieved, from the Find Law Web Site http://writ.news.findlaw.com/commentary/20020502_ramasastry.html
265. Reciprocal / VNU entertainment study reveals online file sharing as likely cause of decline in college market album sales (2001). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.reciprocal.com/prm_rell05242000.asp
266. Reed, C. (2000). Internet law: Text and materials. London: Butterworths.
267. Rees, C., & Chalton, S. (1998). Database law. Bristol, U.K.: Jordan Publishing.
268. Reese, A. R. (2001). Copyright and Internet music transmissions: Existing law, major controversies, possible solutions. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/treese/Miami_Fi.pdf
269. Reidenberg, J. R. (2001). The Yahoo case and the international democratization of the Internet. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=267148
270. Richards, B. J. (2000). The times they are a-changin': A legal perspective on how the Internet is changing the way we buy, sell, and steal music. Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 7, 421-454.
271. Rickard, T. (2000). The patentability of computer software in Europe. Computers and Law, 11(4), 30.
272. Rimm, M. (1995). Marketing pornography on the information superhighway: A survey of 917,410 images, descriptions, short stories and animations downloaded 8.5 million times by consumers in over 2000 cities in forty countries, provinces and territories. Georgetown Law Journal, 83(5), 1849-1943.
273. Robinson, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2002). Does file sharing damage music sales? Unpublished manuscript.
274. Rosenberg, V. (1982). National information policies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 17, 3-32.
275. Sableman, M. (2001). Link law revisited: Internet linking law at five years. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16, 1273-1343.
276. Samuelson, P. (2001). Towards a new politics of intellectual property. Communications of the ACM, 44(3), 98-100.
277. Saxby, S. (1998). Information access policy and crown copyright regulation in the electronic age - which way forward? International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 6(1), 1-33.
278. Schaefer, M. T. (1998). The landmark copyright act: Making life interesting for librarians. Information Retrieval and Library Automation, 34(6), 1-4.
279. Schmidt, C. J. (2000). Media rating schemes: Industry self-defense/regulation, useful for or useable by libraries? Libri, 50(1), 26-31.
280. Schneider, K. (2001). Storm clouds on the horizon: CIPA and the future of the Internet. Library Hi Tech News, 18(3), 19-20.
281. Schragis, S. (2001). Do I need permission? Fair use rules under the federal copyright law. Publishing Research Quarterly, 16(4), 50-63.
282. Schruers, M. (2002). The history and economics of ISP liability for third party content. Virginia Law Review, 88(1), 205-264.
283. Schuyler, M. (1997). When does filtering turn into censorship? Computers in Libraries, 17(5), 34-35.
284. Scileppi, D. C. (2002). Anonymous corporate defamation plaintiffs: Trampling the First Amendment or protecting the rights of litigants? Florida Law Review, 54, 333-360.
285. Seadle, M. (1999). Copyright in the networked world: International complications. Library Hi Tech, 17(3), 326-330.
286. Seadle, M. (2000a). Copyright in the networked world: Linking legalities. Library Hi Tech Journal, 18(4), 400-403.
287. Seadle, M. (2000b). Libraries and the meaning of Napster. Library Hi Tech, 18(4), 301-303.
288. Shaw, J. C. (1997). The Shetland Times case: Are links to other Internet sites illegal? Tblley's Communicator Law, 2(3), 113-115.
289. Sherwill Navarro, P. (1998). Internet in the workplace: Censorship, liability, and freedom of speech. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 17(4), 77-84.
290. Smith, G. J. H. (2002). Internet Law and Regulation (3rd ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
291. Sorkin, D. E. (2001). Technical and legal approaches to unsolicited electronic mail. Univeristy of San Francisco Law Review, 35, 325-384.
292. Spinello, R. (2000). Cyber ethics. Sudbury, UK: Jones and Bartlett.
293. Spring, M. B. (1991). Information technology standards. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 26, 79-111.
294. Stangret, L. A. (1997). The legalities of linking on the World Wide Web. Tblley's Communicator Law, 2(6), 202-215.
295. Stefik, M. (1997). Shifting the possible: How trusted systems and digital property rights challenge us to rethink digital publishing. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 12(1). Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.law.berkeley.edu/journals/btlj/articles/12-1/stefik.html
296. Stevens, J. (1999). The multimedia guidelines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1324-1327.
297. Tatham, D. (2001). The Internet and the universal domain name dispute resolution policy: A seminar report. London: Intellectual Property Institute.
298. Tennant, R. (2000). Peer-to-peer networks: Promise and peril. Library Journal, 125(15), 28-30.
299. Tennant, R. (2001). The copyright war. Library Journal, 126(11), 28-30.
300. Theriault, L. (2001). DOA at the online ramp. Acquisitions Librarian. (26), 61-88.
301. Therien, J. R. (2001). Exorcising the specter of a pay per use society: Toward preserving fair use and the public domain in the digital age. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16, 979-1043.
302. Thomas, D. S. (1997). Cyberspace pornography: Problems with enforcement. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7(3), 201 -207.
303. Tibble, M., & Beasley, D. R. (2001). Contentious patents: Issues and search techniques with high-tech, high-concept patenting. Searcher, 9(2), 28-46.
304. Tollett, I. (2001). Domain names and dispute resolution. World Patent Information, 23(2), 169-175.
305. Tomlinson, D. E., & Nielander, T. (1998). Unchained melody: Music licensing in the digital age. Texas Intellectual Property Journal, 6, 277-315.
306. Tucci, V. (2000). The case of the invisible infringer: Metatags, trademark infringement and false designation of origin. Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 5(2). Retrieved October 25, 2002, from http://journal.law.ufl.edU/~ techlaw/vol15/invisible.htm
307. Tuck, B., Oppenheim, C., & Yeates, R. (1996). Electronic copyright management systems (LITC Report No 8). London: South Bank University.
308. U.K., Department of Trade and Industry. (2002). UK Government consultation on ICANN and the management of the Internet Domain Name system. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dti.gov.uk/cii/ecommerce/icann.shtml
309. Vaidhyanathan, S. (2002). Copyright as cudgel. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45(47), B7-B9.
310. van de Sompel, H. (2000). The Santa Fe Convention of the Open Archives Initiative. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february00/vandesompel-oai/02vandesompel-oai.html
311. Van Zijl, C. (2001). Making your Web site copyright-correct. Mousaion, 19, 73-85.
312. Verbiest, T. (1999). The liability, in French and Belgian laws, of search tools on the Internet. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 7(3), 238-255.
313. Vinje, T. (1999). Coyright imperilled? European Intellectual Property Review, 21(4), 192-207.
314. von Lohmann, F. (2002). Unintended consequences: Three years under the DMCA. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA
315. Ward, C. (1997). Licence to link. Net. (37), 68-72.
316. Watson, N. (2000). The preservation and legal deposit of electronic resources: Is legal deposit desirable or possible in the case of electronic resources? Sheffield, U.K.: University of Sheffield.
317. Weaver, R. L. (2000, October). Defamation law in turmoil: The challenges presented by the Internet. Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/00-3/weaver.html
318. Weinberg, J. (2000). ICANN and the problem of legitimacy. Duke Law Journal, 50(1), 187-260.
319. Widdison, R. (2000). Software patents pending? Retrieved August 1, 2002, from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/00-3/widdison.html
320. Wienand, P. (1997). The legal implications of electronic data exchange. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 18(1), 83-92.
321. Wood, N. (1999). Protecting intellectual property on the Internet: Experience and strategies of trade mark owners in a time of chance. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 13(1), 21-28.
322. Woodyard, D. (2002). Digital Preservation at the British Library. Library & Information Update, 1(2). Retrieved December 6, 2002, from http://www.clip.org/uk/update/issues/may.html
323. Worlock, D. (2001). The subtle art of DRM. Information World Review, 170, 15.
324. Worlock, D. R. (2000). After content: The business of information in the post-copyright age. Business Information Review, 27(4), 191-197.
325. Wrenn, G. J. (2002). Cyberspace is real, national borders are fiction: The protection of expressive rights online through recognition of national borders in Cyberspace. Stanford Journal of International Law, 38, 97-106.
326. Xalabarder, R. (2002). Copyright: Choice of law and jurisdiction in the digital age. Golden Gate University School of Law, 8, 79-96.
327. Yen, A. C. (2000). Internet service provider liability for subscriber copyright infringement, enterprise liability, and the First Amendment. Georgetown Law Journal, 88, 1833-1888.
328. Zimmerman, M. (1999). Free ride? Is advertising on search engines' 'results' screens trademark infringement? Retrieved July 31, 2002, from http://www.fenwick.com/html/free_ride_.htm
329. Zwollo, K. (2001). Digital document delivery and digital rights management. Information Services and Use, 21(1), 9-11.