General well function for pumping from a confined, leaky, or unconfined aquifer

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 317, Issue 3-4, 2006, Pages 239-260

  Perina, Tomas ^a   Lee, Tien Chang ^b  

^a CH2M HILL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Constant drawdown pumping; Constant flowrate pumping; Leaky aquifer; Mixed type boundary condition; Unconfined aquifer; Well function

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CONSTANT FLOWRATE PUMPING; MIXED TYPE BOUNDARY CONDITION; UNCONFINED AQUIFERS; WELL FUNCTION;

WELLS;

FLOW; GROUNDWATER; PUMPING; SKIN EFFECT; WELL; WELLBORE STORAGE;

EID: 28844433720     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.05.020     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J.H. Black, and K.L. Kipp Jr. Observation well response time and its effect upon aquifer test results J. Hydrol. 34 1977 297 306
2. J.J. Butler Jr The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests 1998 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL 252 p
3. G. Cassiani, and Z.J. Kabala Hydraulics of a partially penetrating well: solution to a mixed-type boundary value problem via dual integral equations J. Hydrol. 211 1998 100 111
4. C.C. Chang, and C.S. Chen A flowing partially penetrating well in a finite-thickness aquifer: a mixed-type initial boundary value problem J. Hydrol. 271 2003 101 118
5. R.V. Churchill Operational Mathematics 3rd edition 1972 McGraw-Hill Book Company New York pp. 481
6. M.S. Hantush Drawdown around a partially penetrating well J. Hydrol. Div., Proc. Am. Soc. Civil Eng. 87 4 1961 83 98
7. M.S. Hantush Hydraulics of wells M.S. Hantush V.T. Chow Advances in Hydroscience vol. 1 1964 Academic Press New York 281 432
8. C.J. Hemker Transient well flow in vertically heterogeneous aquifers J. Hydrol. 225 1999 1 18
9. Hvorslev M.J., 1951. Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations. Bull. No. 36, Waterways Exper. Sta. Corps of Engrs, U.S. Army, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1-50.
10. Z. Hyder, J.J. Butler Jr., C.D. McElvee, and W. Liu Slug tests in partially penetrating wells Water Resour. Res. 30 11 1994 2945 2957
11. G. Karadi Technical note: performance of well-groups at constant drawdown Water Resour. Bull. 8 6 1972 1277 1279
12. M.W. Kawecki Meaningful interpretation of step-drawdown tests Ground Water 33 1 1995 23 32
13. T.C. Lee Applied Mathematics in Hydrogeology 1999 Lewis Publishers New York 382 p
14. T.C. Lee, and B.N. Damiata Distortion in resistivity logging at shallow depth Geophysics 60 4 1995 1058 1069
15. T.C. Lee, T. Perina, and C.Y. Lee Validation of parameter determination by extrapolation and spiking aquifer thickness as an unknown J. Hydrol. 265 2002 15 33
16. G. McDonald, and A.W. Harbaugh A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model Tech. Water Resour. Invest. U.S. Geological Survey, Book 6 1988 A1
17. S. Mishra, and D. Guyonnet Analysis of observation-well response during constant-head testing Ground Water 30 4 1992 523 528
18. A.F. Moench Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer Water Resour. Res. 33 6 1997 1397 1407
19. A.F. Moench Correction to Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer by Allen Moench Water Resour. Res. 34 9 1998 2431 2432
20. A.F. Moench, and A. Ogata Analysis of constant discharge wells by numerical inversion of Laplace transform solutions J. Rosenshein G.D. Bennett Groundwater Hydraulics Water Resource Monograph vol. 9 1984 AGU Washington, DC 146 170
21. S.P. Neuman Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the watertable Water Resour. Res. 8 1972 1031 1045
22. S.P. Neuman Supplementary comments on Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the watertable Water Resour. Res. 9 1973 1102 1103
23. S.P. Neuman Effect of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response Water Resour. Res. 10 2 1974 303 312
24. Perina T., 2003. Analytical solutions for groundwater and soil vapor flow to a partially penetrating well with non-uniform radial flux along the screen. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California Riverside; 2003.
25. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolski, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing 1992 Cambridge University Press New York pp. 963
26. T.C. Rasmussen, and L.A. Crawford Identifying and removing barometric pressure effects in confined and unconfined aquifers Ground Water 35 3 1997 502 511
27. A.M. Shapiro Interpretation of ocsillatory water levels in observation wells during aquifer tests in fractured rock Water Resour. Res. 25 10 1989 2129 2137
28. I.N. Sneddon Fourier Transforms 1995 Dover Publications New York pp. 542
29. H. Stehfest Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms Commun. ACM 13 1 1970 47 49
30. C.V. Theis The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 16 1935 519 524
31. Y. Tongpenyai, and R. Raghavan The effect of wellbore storage and skin on interference test data J. Petrol. Technol. 33 1 1981 151 160
32. P.H. Tseng, and T.C. Lee Numerical evaluation of exponential integral: Theis well function approximation J. Hydrol. 205 1998 38 51