A flowing partially penetrating well in a finite-thickness aquifer: A mixed-type initial boundary value problem

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 271, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 101-118

  Chang, Chien Chieh ^a   Chen, Chia Shyun ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Confined aquifers; Constant drawdown; Groundwater flow; Mixed boundary; Partial penetration

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; AQUIFERS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HYDRAULICS; LAPLACE TRANSFORMS;

PENETRATING WELL;

HYDROLOGY;

AQUIFER; DRAWDOWN; GROUNDWATER; MATHEMATICAL MODELING; PENETRATION;

CONFINED AQUIFER; DRAWDOWN; GROUNDWATER FLOW; NUMERICAL MODEL; PENETRATION;

EID: 0037428989     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00323-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.A., 1970. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, New York, 1046 pp..
2. Cassiani, G., Kabala, Z.J., 1998. Hydraulics of a partially penetrating well: solution to a mixed-type boundary value problem via dual integral equations. J. Hydrol. 211, 100-111.
3. Cassiani, G., Kabala, Z.J., Medina, M.A. Jr., 1999. Flowing partially penetrating well: solution to a mixed-type boundary value problem. Adv. Water Resour. 23, 59-68.
4. Chen, C.S., Chang, C.C., 2002. Use of cumulative volume of constant-head injection test to estimate aquifer parameters with skin effects: field experiment and data analysis. Water Resour. Res. 38 (5), 10.1029/2001 WR000300.
5. Chen, C.S., Stone, W.D., 1993. Asymptotic calculation of Laplace inverse in analytical solutions of groundwater problems. Water Resour. Res. 29 (1), 207-209.
6. Cooper, H.H., Jacob, C.E., 1946. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well field history. Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 27, 526-534.
7. Dagan, G., 1978. A note on packer, slug, and recovery tests in unconfined aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 14, 929-934.
8. Dougherty, D.E., Babu, D.K., 1984. Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resour. Res. 20 (8), 1116-1122.
9. Fabrikant, V.I., 1991. Mixed Boundary Value Problems of Potential Theory and their Application in Engineering, Kluwer, Netherlands, pp. 451.
10. Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M., 1980. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, Academic Press Inc, New York.
11. Gringarten, A.C., Ramey, H.J. Jr., 1975. An approximate infinite conductivity solution for a partially penetrating line-source well. Soc. Pet. Engng. J. 259, 140-148.
12. Hantush, M.S., 1961. Aquifer tests on partially penetrating wells. J. Hydraul. Div. Proc. ASCE87(HY5), 95-171.
13. Hantush, M.S., 1964. Hydraulics of wells. In: Chow, V.T., (Ed.), Advances in Hydroscience, vol.1. Academic Press, New York.
14. Hemker, C.J., 1999. Transient well flow in vertically heterogeneous aquifers. J. Hydrol. 225, 1-18.
15. Hiller, C.K., Levy, B.S., 1994. Estimation of aquifer diffusivity from analysis of constant head pumping test data. Ground Water 32 (1), 47-52.
16. Huang, S.C., 1985. Unsteady-state heat conduction in semi-infinite regions with mixed-type boundary conditions. J. Heat Transfer 107, 489-491.
17. Huang, S.C., Chang, Y.P., 1984. Anisotropic heat conduction with mixed boundary conditions. J. Heat Transfer 106, 646-648.
18. Jacob, C.E., Lohman, S.W., 1952. Nonsteady flow to a well of constant drawdown in extensive aquifers. Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 33, 559-569.
19. Javandel, I., 1982. Analytical solutions in subsurface fluid flow. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 189, 223-235.
20. Jones, L., Lemar, T., Tsai, C.-T., 1992. Results of two pumping tests in Wisconsin age weathered till in Iowa. Ground Water 30 (4), 529-538.
21. Lee, T.C., Damiata, B.N., 1995. Distortion in resistivity logging as shallow depth. Geopysics 60, 1058-1069.
22. Mishra, S., Guyonnet, D., 1992. Analysis of observation-well response during constant-head testing. Ground Water 30 (4), 523-528.
23. Moench, A.F., 1985. Transient flow to a large-diameter well in an aquifer with storative semiconfining layers. Water Resour. Res. 21 (8), 1121-1131.
24. Murdoch, L.C., Franco, J., 1994. The analysis of constant drawdown wells using instantaneous source functions. Water Resour. Res. 30 (1), 117-124.
25. Muskat, M., 1946. The Flow of Homogeneours Fluids Through Porous Media, McGraw-Hill, New York, (reprint from 1937).
26. Noble, B., 1958. Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique, Pergamon Press, New York.
27. Novakowski, K.S., 1993. Interpretation of the transient flow rate obtained from constant-head tests conducted in situ in clays. Can. Geotech. J. 30, 600-606.
28. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York, 933 pp..
29. Rice, J.B., 1998. Constant drawdown aquifer tests: an alternative to traditional constant rate tests. Ground Water Monit. R. 18 (2), 76-78.
30. Ruud, N.C., Kabala, Z.J., 1997. Response of a partially penetrating well in a heterogeneous aquifer: integrated well-face flux versus uniform well-face flux boundary conditions. J. Hydrol. 194, 76-94.
31. Selim, M.S., Kirkham, D., 1974. Screen theory for wells and soil drainpipes. Water Resour. Res. 10 (5), 1019-1030.
32. Sneddon, I.N., 1966. Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Potential Theory, Wiley, New York.
33. Sneddon, I.N., 1972. The Use of Integral Transforms, McGraw-Hill, New York, 540 pp..
34. Stehfest, H., 1970. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun. ACM 13, 47-49.
35. Streltsova, T.D., 1988. Well Testing in Heterogeneous Formations, An Exxon Monograph, Wiley, New York, 423 pp..
36. Talbot, A., 1979. The accurate numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. J. Inst. Math. Appl. 23, 97-120.
37. Wilkinson, D., Hammond, P.S., 1990. A perturbation method for mixed boundary-value problems in pressure transient testing. Trans. Porous Media 5 (6), 609-636.