Hydraulics of a partially penetrating well: Solution to a mixed-type boundary value problem via dual integral equations

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 211, Issue 1-4, 1998, Pages 100-111

  Cassiani, G ^a   Kabala, Z J ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual integral equations; Mixed type boundary value problem; Partially penetrating well

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; HYDRAULICS; INTEGRAL EQUATIONS;

DUAL INTEGRAL EQUATIONS; MIXED TYPE BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM; PARTIALLY PENETRATING WELL;

WELLS;

AQUIFER; HYDRAULICS; WELL PUMP;

EID: 0032215669     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00223-6     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Banasiak J., Roach G.F. On corner singularities on solutions to mixed boundary-value problems for 2nd-order elliptic and parabolic equations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A-Math. Phys. Sci. 433(1887):1991;209-217.
2. Bassani J.L., Nansteel M.W., November M. Adiabatic-isothermal mixed boundary conditions in heat transfer. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 30:1987;903-909.
3. Bateman Manuscript Project, 1954. Tables of integral transforms. Based, in part, on notes left by Harry Bateman, McGraw-Hill, New York.
4. Braester C., Thunvik R. Determination of formation permeability by double-packer tests. J. Hydrol. 72:1984;375-389.
5. Bredehoeft J.D. The drill-stem test: the petroleum industry's deep-well pumping test. Ground Water. 3(3):1965;31-36.
6. Brigham, E.O., 1974. The fast Fourier transform, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
7. Brons F., Marting V.E. The effect of restricted fluid entry on well productivity. J. Petrol. Technol. 13:1961;172-174.
8. Champeney, D.C., 1973. Fourier Transforms and Their Physical Applications, Academic Press, New York.
9. Cooper H.H. Jr., Bredehoeft J.D., Papadopulos I.S. Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water. Water Resour. Res. 3:1967;263-269.
10. Courant, R., Hilbert, D., 1953. Methods of Mathematical Physics, vol.1, Interscience, New York.
11. Dagan G. A note on packer, slug, and recovery tests in unconfined aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 14:1978;929-934.
12. Dawson, K.J., Istok, J.D., 1991. Aquifer Testing, Design and Analysis of Pumping and Slug Tests. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
13. Dougherty D.E., Babu D.K. Flow to a partially penetrating well in a double-porosity reservoir. Water Resour. Res. 20(8):1984;1116-1122.
14. Drucker D.C., Rice J.R. Plastic deformation in brittle and ductile fracture. Engng Fracture Mech. 1:1970;602-755.
15. Earlougher, R.C. Jr., 1977. Advances in well test analysis, Soc. Petrol. Engrs. AIME, special monograph, vol. 5. Soc. Petrol. Engrs. Richardson, TX.
16. Ehlig-Economides C.A., Hegeman P., Vik S. Guidelines simplify well test intepretation. Oil Gas J., July. 18:1994;33-40.
17. Fabrikant, V.I., 1991. Mixed boundary value problems of potential theory and their applications in engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
18. Hantush M.S. Nonsteady flow to a well partially penetrating an infinite leaky aquifer. Proc. Iraqi Sci. Soc. 1:1957;10-19.
19. Hantush M.S. Drawdown around a partially penetrating well. J. Hydraul. Div. Proc. ASCE. 87(HY4):1961;83-98.
20. Hantush M.S. Aquifer tests on partially penetrating wells. J. Hydraul. Div. Proc. ASCE. 87(HY5):1961;171-195.
21. Hantush, M.S., 1964. Hydraulics of wells. In: Chow, W.T. (Ed.), Advances in Hydroscience, vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.
22. Hantush M.S., Jacob C.E. Non-steady radial flow in an infinite leaky aquifer Trans. Am. Geophys. Union. 36:1955;95-100.
23. Horvay G. The dip-forming process. ASME J. Heat Transfer. 87:1965;1-16.
24. Huang S.C. Unsteady-state heat conduction in semi-infinite regions with mixed-type boundary conditions. J. Heat Transfer. 107:1985;489-491.
25. Huang S.C., Chang Y.P. Anisotropic heat conduction with mixed boundary conditions. J. Heat Transfer. 106:1984;646-648.
26. Hyder Z., Butler J.J., McElwee C.D., Liu W.Z. Slug tests in partially penetrating wells. Water Resour. Res. 30(11):1994;2945-2957.
27. Kabala Z.J. Measuring distributions of hydraulic conductivity and specific storativity by the double flowmeter test. Water Resour. Res. 30(3):1994;685-690.
28. Karasaki K. A systematized drillstem test. Water Resour. Res. 26(12):1990;2913-2919.
29. Kohlhaas C.A. A method for analyzing pressures measured during drillstem test flow periods. J. Petrol. Technol. 24:1972;1278-1282.
30. Kruseman, G.P., De Ridder, N.A., 1990. Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data. 2nd ed. (completely revised), ILRI publication 47, Wagenigen, Netherlands.
31. Lai R.Y., Su C. Nonsteady flow to a large well in a leaky aquifer. J. Hydrol. 22:1974;333-345.
32. Lamb, H., 1932. Hydrodynamics, 6th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Marinelli F., Rowe J.W. Performance and analysis of drillstem tests in small-diameter boreholes. Ground Water. 23:1985;367-376.
34. Melville J.G., Molz F.J., Guven O., Widdowson M.A. Multilevel slug tests with comparisons to tracer data. Ground Water. 29(6):1991;897-906.
35. Moench A.F., Hsieh P. Comment on 'Evaluation of slug tests in wells containing a fine-thickness skin' by C.R. Faust and J.W. Mercer. Water Resour. Res. 21(9):1985;1459-1461.
36. Molz, F.J., Güven, O., Melville, J.G., 1990. A new approach and methodologies for characterizing the hydrogeologic properties of aquifers. Report EPA/600/2-90/002, US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK.
37. Muskat, M., 1946. The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids Through Porous Media. McGraw-Hill, New York (reprint from 1937).
38. Neuman S.P. Effects of partial penetration on flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed aquifer response. Water Resour. Res. 10(2):1974;303-312.
39. Niesle R.G. The effect of partial penetration on pressure buildup on oil wells. Trans. Soc. Pet. Engrs. AIME. 213:1958;85-90.
40. Noble, B., 1958. Methods Based on the Wiener-Hopf Technique. Pergamon Press, New York.
41. Novakowski K.S. Interpretation of the transient flow rate obtained from constant- head tests conducted in situ in clays. Can. Geotechnol. J. 30:1993;600-606.
42. Odeh A.S. Steady-state flow capacity of wells with limited entry to flow. Soc. Petrol. Engrs. J. 8:1968;43-51.
43. Papadopulos I.S., Cooper H.H. Jr. Drawdown in a well of large diameter. Water Resour. Res. 3:1967;241-244.
44. Rehfeldt, K.R., Hufschmied, P., Gelhar, L.W., Schaefer, M.E., 1988. The borehole flowmeter technique for measuring hydraulic conductivity variability. Report No. EN 6511, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
45. Ruud N.C., Kabala Z.J. Numerical evaluation of flowmeter test interpretation methodologies. Water Resour. Res. 32(4):1996;845-852.
46. Ruud N.C., Kabala Z.J. Response of a partially penetrating well in a heterogeneous aquifer: integrated well-face flux versus uniform well-face flux boundary conditions. J. Hydrol. 166:1998;000-000. in press.
47. Sadhal S.S. Unsteady heat flow between solids with partially contacting interfaces. ASME J. Heat Transfer. 103:1981;32-35.
48. Schneider G.E. An investigation into the heat loss characteristics of buried pipes. ASME J. Heat Transfer. 107:1985;696-699.
49. Sneddon, I.N., 1966. Mixed Boundary Value Problems in Potential Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, and Wiley, New York.
50. Stehfest H. Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Commun. ACM. 13:1970;47-49.
51. Taylor K., Wheatcraft S.W., Hess J., Hayworth J.S., Molz F.J. Evaluation of methods for determining the vertical distribution of hydraulic conductivity. Ground Water. 28:1990;88-98.
52. Teller, R.W, Chafin, D.T., 1986. Selected drill-stem test data for the Upper Colorado River. Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4146, U.S. Geological Survey, Lakewood, CO.
53. Theis, C.V., 1935. The relation between the lowering of the piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using groundwater storage. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, Ann. Meet. 16, 519-524.
54. Theuveny, B.C., Jack, W.A., Economides, M.J., 1985. Pressure transient analysis for single well/reservoir configurations (considering partial penetration, mixed boundary, wellbore storage, and skin effects). SPE 13627, SPE 1985 California Reg. Meet., Bakersfield, CA.
55. Tien C.L., Yao L.S. Analysis of conduction controlled rewetting of a vertical surface. J. Heat Transfer. 97:1975;161-165.
56. Tranter, C.J., 1966. Integral Transforms in Mathematical Physics, 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.
57. Van Poollen H.K. Status of drill-stem testing techniques and analysis. J. Petrol. Technol. 13:1961;333-339.
58. Walton, W.C., 1970. Groundwater Resources Evaluation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
59. Widdowson M.A., Molz F.J., Melville J.G. An analysis technique for multilevel and partially penetrating slug test data. Ground Water. 28(6):1990;937-945.
60. Wilkinson D., Hammond P.S. A perturbation method for mixed boundary-value problems in pressure transient testing. Trans. Porous Media. 5(6):1990;609-636.
61. Yedder R.B., Bilgen E. On adiabatic-isothermal mixed boundary conditions in heat transfer. Wärme- Stoffübertragung. 29:1994;457-460.