Outcome similarity modulates retroactive interference between cues trained apart

Psicologica

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 281-292

  Pineño, Oskar ^a   Matute, Helena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEUSTO   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28744443734     PISSN: 02112159     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Abra, J. C. (1967). Time changes in the strength of forward and backward associations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 640-645.
2. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 522-530.
3. Bjork, R. A. (1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In Roediger, H. L. III, Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), Varieties of Memory and Consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 309-330.
4. Bouton, M. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 80-99.
5. Cheung, C. G., & Goulet, L. R. (1968). Retroactive inhibition of R-S associations in the A-B, B-C, C-B paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 327-328.
6. Delaney, H. D., & Logan, F. A. (1979). Item similarity and proactive interference in short-term memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 14, 288-290.
7. Dickinson, A., & Burke, J. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 60-80.
8. Escobar, M., Arcediano, F., & Miller, R. R. (2001). Conditions favoring retroactive interference between antecedent events (cue competition) and between subsequent events (outcome competition). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 691-697.
9. Escobar, M., Matute, H., & Miller, R. R. (2001). Cues trained apart compete for behavioral control in rats: Convergence with the associative interference literature. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 97-115.
10. Escobar, M., & Miller, R. R. (2003). Timing in retroactive interference. Learning & Behavior, 31, 257-272.
11. Escobar, M., Pineño, O., & Matute, H. (2002). A comparison between elemental and compound training of cues in retrospective revaluation. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30, 228-238.
12. Johnston, W. A. (1968). Bidirectional interference in an A-B, C-B paradigm. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 305-311.
13. Kamin, L. J. (1968). "Attention-like" processes in classical conditioning. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation (pp 9-31). Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.
14. Keppel, G., Bonge, D., Strand, B. Z., & Parker, J. (1971). Direct and indirect interference in the recall of paired associates. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 414-422.
15. Lipp, O. V., & Dal Santo, L. (2002). Cue competition between elementally trained stimuli: US miscuing, interference, and US omission. Learning and Motivation, 33, 327-346.
16. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
17. Matute, H., & Pineño, O. (1998a). Cue Competition in the absence of compound training: Its relation to paradigms of interference between outcomes. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 38 (pp. 45-81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18. Matute, H., & Pineño, O. (1998b). Stimulus competition in the absence of compound conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 3-14.
19. Miller, R. R., & Escobar, M. (2002). Associative interference between cues and between outcomes presented together and presented apart: An integration. Behavioural Processes, 57, 163-185.
20. Miller, R. R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370-386.
21. Miller, R. R., & Matzel, L. D. (1988). The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 22 (pp.51-92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: A resolution. Psychological Review, 56, 132-143.
23. Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
24. Pineño, O., & Matute, H. (2000). Interference in human predictive learning when associations share a common element. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 13, 16-33.
25. Pineño, O., Ortega, N., & Matute, H. (2000). The relative activation of the associations modulates interference between elementally-trained cues. Learning and Motivation, 31, 128-152.
26. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Robinson, E. S. (1927). The "similarity" factor in retroaction. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 297-312.
28. Schwartz, M. (1968). Effect of stimulus class on transfer and RI in the A-B, A-C paradigm. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 189-195.
29. Shanks, D. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37B, 1-21.
30. Underwood, B. J. (1966). Experimental psychology (2nd edition). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31. Van Hamme, L. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (1994). Cue competition in causality judgments: The role of nonpresentation of compound stimulus elements. Learning and Motivation, 25, 127-151.
32. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Wickens, D. D., Born, D. G., & Allen, C. K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 440-445.