A comparison of the mismatch negativity and a differential waveform response

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 44, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 637-646

  Elangovan, Saravanan ^a   Cranford, Jerry L ^b   Walker, Letitia ^c   Stuart, Andrew ^d,e  

^a East Tennesse State University   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d East Carolina State University   (United States)

^e EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory event related potentials; Mismatch negativity; Neural recovery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFERENTIAL WAVEFORM RESPONSE; EVALUATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCALP; STANDARD; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE TESTS; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 28744441563     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222930500271564     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ahveninen, J., Escera, C., Polo, M.D., Grau, C. & Jaaskelainen, I.P. 2000. Acute and chronic effects of alcohol on preattentive auditory processing as reflected by mismatch negativity. Audiol Neurotol, 5, 303-311.
2. Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M. & Näätänen, R. 1986. Separability of different negative components of the event-related potential associated with auditory stimulus processing. Psychophysiology, 23, 613-623.
3. Alho, K., Woods, D., Algazi, A., Knight, R. & Näätä nen, R. 1994. Lesions of frontal cortex diminish the auditory mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 9, 353-362.
4. Allison, T. 1962. Recovery functions of somatosensory evoked responses in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 14, 331-343.
5. American National Standards Institute 1996. Specifications for audiometers. (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: ANSI.
6. American National Standards Institute 1999. American National Standard: Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. (ANSI S3.1-1999). New York: ANSI.
7. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: Panel on Audiologic Assessment 1997. Guidelines for Audiologic Screening. Rockville Pike, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
8. Brand, A., Urban, R. & Grothe, B. 2000. Duration tuning in the mouse auditory midbrain. J Neurophysiol, 84, 1790-1799.
9. Budd, T.W., Barry, R.J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C. & Michie, P.T. 1998. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol, 31, 51-68.
10. Butler, R.A. 1968. Effect of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential. J Acoust Soc Am, 44, 945-950.
11. Butler, R.A. 1972. Frequency specificity of the auditory evoked response to simultaneously and successively presented stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 33, 277-282.
12. Butler, R.A. 1973. The cumulative effects of different stimulus repetition rates on the auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 35, 337-345.
13. Butler, R.A., Spreng, M. & Keidel, W.D. 1969. Stimulus repetition rate factors which influence the auditory evoked potential in man. Psychophysiology, 5, 665-672.
14. Casseday, J.H., Ehrlich, D. & Covey, E. 2000. Neural measurement of sound duration: control by excitatory-inhibitory interactions in the inferior colliculus. J Neurophysiol, 84, 1475-1487s.
15. Cheour, M., Haapanen, M.L., Hukki, J., Ceponiene, R., Kurjenluoma, S., et al. 1997. The first neurophysiological evidence for cognitive brain dysfunctions in children with CATCH. Neuroreport, 8, 1785-1787.
16. Covey, E. 2000. Neural population coding and auditory temporal pattern analysis. Physiol Behav, 69, 211-220.
17. Cowan, N. 1995. Sensory memory and its role in information processing. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 44(Suppl.), 21-31.
18. Cranford, J.L., Walker, L.J., Stuart, A., Elangovan, S. & Pravica, D. 2003. Potential contamination effects of neuronal refractoriness on the speech-evoked mismatch negativity response. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 251-259.
19. Csépe, V. 1995. On the origin and development of the mismatch negativity. Ear Hear, 16, 91-104.
20. Czigler, I., Balázs, L. & Winkler, I. 2002. Memory-based detection of task irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology, 39, 869-873.
21. Davis, H., Mast, T., Yoshie, N. & Zerlin, S. 1966. The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 21, 105-113.
22. Deacon, D., Gomes, H., Nousak, J.M., Ritter, W. & Javitt, D. 2000. Effect of frequency separation and stimulus rate on the mismatch negativity: an examination of the issue of refractoriness in humans. Neurosci Lett, 287, 167-170.
23. Ehrlich, D., Casseday, J.H. & Covey, E. 1997. Neural tuning to sound duration in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat, eptesicus fuscus. J Neurophysiol, 77, 2360-2372.
24. Gaeta, H., Friedman, D., Ritter, W. & Cheng, J. 1998. An event-related potential study of age-related changes in sensitivity to stimulus deviance. Neurobiol Aging, 19, 447-459.
25. Giard, M.H., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K., Perrin, F., Bertrand, O., et al. 1995. Separate representations of stimulus frequency, intensity, and duration in auditory sensory memory: An event-related potential and dipole model analysis. J Cog Neurosc, 7, 133-143.
26. Giard, M.H., Pernier, J., Perrin, F. & Peronnet, F. 1987. Topographic study of auditory attention-related waveforms: a preliminary report. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 40(Suppl.), 92-98.
27. Grau, C., Polo, M.D., Yago, E., Gual, A. & Escera, C. 2001. Auditory sensory memory as indicated by mismatch negativity in chronic alcoholism. Clin Neurophysiol, 112, 728-731.
28. Groenen, P., Snik, A. & van den Broek, P. 1996. On the clinical relevance of mismatch negativity: results from subjects with normal hearing and cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol, 1, 112-124.
29. Guang-Di, C. & Chen, A. 1998. Effects of stimulus duration on responses of neurons in the chinchilla inferior colliculus. Hear Res, 122, 142-150.
30. He, J., Hashikawa, T., Ojima, H. & Kinouchi, Y. 1997. Temporal integration and duration tuning in the dorsal zone of cat auditory cortex. J Neurosci, 17, 2615-2625.
31. Jacobson, T. & Schroger, E. 2001. Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch? Psychophysiology, 38, 723-727.
32. Jasper, H. 1958. Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in Electroencephalography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 10, 305-375.
33. Kane, N.M., Curry, S.H., Butler, S.R. & Cummins, B.H. 1993. Electrophysiological indicator of awakening from coma. Lancet, 341, 688-696.
34. Kazmerski, V.A., Friedman, D. & Ritter, W. 1997. Mismatch negativity during attend and ignore conditions in Alzheimer's disease. Biol Psychol, 42, 382-402.
35. Kraus, N., McGee, T.J., Carrell, T.D., Zecker, S.G, Nicol, T.G., et al. 1996. Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science, 273, 971-973.
36. Mantysalo, S. & Näätänen, R. 1987. The duration of a neuronal trace of an auditory stimulus as indicated by event-related potentials. Biol Psychol, 24, 183-195.
37. May, P., Tiitinen, H., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Nyman, G., Taylor, J.G., et al. 1999. Frequency change detection in human auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci, 6, 99-120.
38. Näätänen, R. 1995. The mismatch negativity: a powerful tool for cognitive neuroscience. Ear Hear, 16, 6-18.
39. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A.W.K. & Mantysalo, S. 1978. Early selective attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
40. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K. & Sams, M. 1987. The mismatch negativity to intensity changes in an auditory stimulus sequence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 40(Suppl.), 125-131.
41. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K. & Sams, M. 1989a. Do event-related potentials reveal the mechanism of the auditory sensory memory in the human brain? Neurosci Lett, 98, 217-221.
42. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K. & Sams, M. 1989b. Event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man. Neurosci Lett, 107, 347-352.
43. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Tiitinen, H., Jiang, D. & Alho, K. 1993. Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 30, 436-450.
44. Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T. & Takegata, R. 2004. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol, 115, 140-144.
45. Näätänen, R., Sams, M., Alho, K., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., et al. 1988. Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 69, 523-531.
46. Näätänen, R., Teder, W., Alho, K. & Lavikainen, J. 1992. Auditory attention and selective input modulation: a topographical ERP study. Neuroreport, 3, 493-496.
47. Nelson, D.A. & Lassman, F.M. 1968. Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response. J Acoust Soc Am, 44, 1529-1532.
48. Nelson, D.A. & Lassman, F.M. 1973. Combined effects of recovery period and stimulus intensity on the human auditory-evoked vertex response. J Speech Hear Res, 16, 297-308.
49. Nelson, D.A. & Lassman, F.M. 1977. Re-examination of the effects of periodic and aperiodic stimulation on the auditory-evoked vertex response. Audiology, 16, 409-418.
50. Novak, G.P., Ritter, W., Vaughan, H.G. Jr., & Wiznitzer, M.L. 1990. Differentiation of negative event-related potentials in an auditory discrimination task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 75, 255-275.
51. Ornitz, E.M., Tanguay, P.E., Forsythe, A.B., De La Pena, A. & Ghahremani, J. 1974. The recovery cycle of the averaged auditory evoked response during sleep in normal children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 37, 113-122.
52. Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., Sams, M. & Näätänen, R. 1991. Right hemisphere dominance of different mismatch negativity's. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 466-479.
53. Papanicolaou, A.C., Loring, D.W. & Eisenberg, H.M. 1984. Age-related differences in recovery cycle of auditory evoked potentials. Neurobiol Aging, 5, 291-295.
54. Pekkonen, E., Jousmaki, V., Kalevi, R. & Juhani, P. 1994. Automatic auditory discrimination is impaired in Parkinson's disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 95, 47-52.
55. Pekkonen, E., Rinne, T. & Näätänen, R. 1995. Variability and replicability of the mismatch negativity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 96, 546-554.
56. Pekkonen, E., Rinne, T., Reinikainen, T., Kujala, K., Alho, K., et al. 1996. Aging effects on auditory processing: an event-related potential study. Exp Aging Res, 22, 171-184.
57. Pfingst, B.E. & O'Conner, T.A. 1981. Characteristics of neurons in auditory cortex of monkeys performing a simple auditory task. J Neurophysiol, 45, 16-34.
58. Phillips, D.P. & Orman, S.S. 1984. Responses of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex to tonal stimulation. J Neurophysiol, 51, 147-163.
59. Phillips, D.P., Orman, S.S., Musicant, A.D. & Wilson, G.F. 1985. Neurons in the cat's primary auditory cortex distinguished by their responses to tones and wide-spectrum noise. Hear Res, 18, 73-86.
60. Phillips, D.P., Semple, M.N. & Kitzes, L.M. 1995. Factors shaping the tone level sensitivity of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 73, 674-686.
61. Picton, T.W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W. & Achim, A. 2000. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurotol, 5, 111-139.
62. Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L., Baribeau-Braun, J. & Healey, T.M. 1976. Evoked potential audiometry. J Otolaryngol, 6, 90-119.
63. Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L. & Proulx, G.B. 1978. Human auditory sustained potentials. II. Stimulus relationships. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 45, 198-210.
64. Sabri, M. & Campbell, K.B. 2001. Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity. Cogn Brain Res, 12, 171-180.
65. Sams, M., Kaukoranta, E., Hamalainen, M. & Näätänen, R. 1991. Cortical activity elicited by changes in auditory stimuli: different sources for the magnetic N100m and mismatch responses. Psychophysiology, 28, 21-29.
66. Sasaki, T., Campbell, K.B., Gordon Bazana, P. & Stelmack, R.M. 2000. Individual differences in mismatch negativity measures of involuntary attention shift. Clin Neurophysiol, 111, 1553-1560.
67. Scherg, M., Vajsar, J. & Picton, T.W. 1989. A source analysis of the human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci, 1, 336-354.
68. Schroger, E. & Winkler, I. 1995. Presentation rate and magnitude of stimulus deviance effects on human pre-attentive change detection. Neurosci Lett, 193, 185-188.
69. Schroger, E. & Wolff, C. 1996. Mismatch response of the human brain to changes in sound location. Neuroreport, 7, 3005-3008.
70. Semlitsch, H.V., Anderer, R., Schuster, P. & Presslich, O. 1986. A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703.
71. Shagrass, C.D.A., Overton, A., & Straumanis, J.J. Jr. 1971. Evoked response findings in psychiatric illness related to drug abuse. Biol Psych, 3, 259-272.
72. Shucard, D.W., Cummins, K.R., Thomas, D.G. & Shucard, J.L. 1984. Evoked potentials to auditory probes as indices of cerebral specialization of function - replication and extension. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 52, 389-393.
73. Suga, N. & Manabe, T. 1982. Neural basis of amplitude-spectrum representation in auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol, 4, 225-255.
74. Takegata, R. & Morotomi, T. 1999. Integrated neural representation of sound and temporal features in human auditory sensory memory: an event-related potential study. Neurosci Lett, 274, 207-210.
75. Tiitinen, H., Alho, K., Huotilainen, M., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Simola, J., et al. 1993. Tonotopic auditory cortex and the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) equivalent of the mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 30, 537-540.
76. Ulanovsky, N., Las, L. & Nelken, I. 2003. Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature Neurosci, 6, 391-398.
77. Walker, L.J., Carpenter, M., Downs, C.R., Cranford, J.L., Stuart, A., et al. 2001. Possible neuronal refractory or recovery artifacts associated with recording the mismatch negativity response. J Am Acad Audiol, 2, 348-356.
78. Winkler, J., Karmos, G. & Näätänen, R. 1996. Adaptive modeling of the unattended acoustic environment reflected in the mismatch negativity event-related potential. Brain Res, 742, 239-252.
79. Woldorff, M.G., Hackley, S.A. & Hillyard, S.A. 1991. The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology, 28, 30-42.
80. Woods, D.L. 1992. Auditory selective attention in middle-aged and elderly subjects: an event related brain potential study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 84, 456-468.