Sexual dimorphism or evolutionary branching?

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 6, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 857-871

  Van Dooren, Tom J M ^a   Durinx, M ^a   Demon, I ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ROTHAMSTED RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dominance evolution; Ecological polymorphism; Evolutionary branching; Sexual dimorphism; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644226893     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abrams, P.A., Harada, Y. and Matsuda, H. 1993. On the relationship between quantitative genetic and ESS models. Evolution, 47: 982-985.
2. Badyaev, A.V. 2002. Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. TREE, 17: 369-378.
3. Balkau, B. and Feldman, M.W. 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics, 74: 171-174.
4. Bolnick, D.I. and Doebeli, M. 2003. Sexual dimorphism and adaptive speciation: two sides of the same ecological coin. Evolution, 57: 2433-2449.
5. Bulmer, M.G. 1980. The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Charnov, E.L. 1982. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Christiansen, F.B. 1991. On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Am. Nat., 138: 37-50.
8. Dickinson, H. and Antonovics, J. 1973. Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence. Am. Nat., 107: 256-274.
9. Dieckmann, U. and Doebeli, M. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature, 400: 354-357.
10. Dieckmann, U. and Law, R. 1996. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol., 34: 579-612.
11. Diekmann, O., Gyllenberg, M. and Metz, J.A.J. 2003. Steady-state analysis of structured population models. Theor. Pop. Biol., 63: 309-338.
12. Doebeli, M. and Dieckmann, U. 2003. Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature, 421: 259-264.
13. Eshel, I. 1983. Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol., 103: 99-111.
14. Eshel, I. and Motro, U. 1981. Kin selection and strong evolutionary stability of mutual help. Theor. Pop. Biol., 19: 420-433.
15. Fisher, R. 1930. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. Gavrilets, S. and Waxman, D. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99: 10533-10538.
17. Geritz, S.A.H., Kisdi, E., Meszéna, G. and Metz, J.A.J. 1998. Evolutionary singular strategies and the growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol., 12: 35-57.
18. Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A. and Nee, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The 'handicap' principle. Evolution, 45: 1431-1442.
19. Kisdi, É. 1999. Evolutionary branching under asymmetric competition. J. Theor. Biol., 197: 149-162.
20. Kisdi, É. and Geritz, S.A.H. 1999a. Adaptive dynamics in allele space: evolution of genetic polymorphism by small mutations in a heterogeneous environment. Evolution, 53: 993-1008.
21. Kisdi, É. and Geritz, S.A.H. 1999b. Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation in Diploid Populations. IIASA Interim Report IR-99-048.
22. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution, 34: 292-305.
23. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA, 78: 3721-3725.
24. Leimar, O. 2001. Evolutionary change and Darwinian demons. Selection, 2: 65-72.
25. Leimar, O. in press. Multidimensional convergence stability and the canonical adaptive dynamics. In Elements of Adaptive Dynamics (U. Dieckmann and J.A.J. Metz, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Mackay, T.F.C. 2001. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Annu. Rev. Genet., 35: 303-339.
27. Mackay, T.F.C., Lyman, R.F. and Jackson, M.S. 1992. Effects of P element insertions on quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics, 130: 315-332.
28. Matessi, C., Gimelfarb, A. and Gavrilets, S. 2001. Long term buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection, 2: 41-64.
29. Merilä, J., Sheldon, B.C. and Ellegren, H. 1998. Quantitative genetics of sexual size dimorphism in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis. Evolution, 52: 870-876.
30. Meszéna, G., Czibula, I. and Geritz, S.A.H. 1997. Adaptive dynamics in a 2-patch environment: a toy model for allopatric and parapatric speciation. J. Biol. Syst., 5: 265-284.
31. Metz, J.A.J., Nisbet, R.M. and Geritz, S.A.H. 1992. How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios? TREE, 7: 198-202.
32. Metz, J.A.J., Geritz, S.A.H., Meszéna, G., Jacobs, F.J.A. and van Heerwaarden, J. 1996. Adaptive dynamics: a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems (S.J. Van Strien and S.M. Verduyn Lunel, eds.), pp. 183-231. Amsterdam: KNAW Verhandelingen, North-Holland.
33. Pomiankowski, A., Iwasa, Y. and Nee, S. 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution, 45: 1422-1430.
34. Rand, D.A., Wilson, H.B. and McGlade, J.M. 1994. Dynamics and evolution: stable attractors, invasion exponents and phenotype dynamics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 343: 261-283.
35. Rogers, A.R. and Mukherjee, A. 1992. Quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in human body size. Evolution, 46: 226-234.
36. Roughgarden, J. 1979. Theory of Population Genetics and Evolutionary Ecology: An Introduction. New York: Macmillan.
37. Shaw, R.F. and Mohler, J.D. 1953. The selective significance of the sex ratio. Am. Nat., 87: 337-342.
38. Shine, R. 1989. Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 64: 419-441.
39. Slatkin, M. 1984. Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution, 38: 622-630.
40. Temeles, E.J. and Kress, W.J. 2003. Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science, 300: 630-633.
41. Temeles, E.J., Pan, I.L., Brennan, J.L. and Horwitt, J.N. 2000. Evidence for ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science, 289: 441-443.
42. Van Dooren, T.J.M. 1999. The evolutionary ecology of dominance- recessivity. J. Theor. Biol., 198: 519-532.
43. van Doorn, G.S. and Weissing, F.J. 2001. Ecological versus sexual selection models of sympatric speciation. Selection, 2: 17-40.