Duplication events and the evolution of segmental identity

Evolution and Development

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 556-567

  Hurley, I ^a   Hale, M E ^a   Prince, V E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; SEGMENTATION;

ANIMAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; FISH; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; GENOME; HOMEOBOX; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MORPHOGENESIS;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISHES; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, HOMEOBOX; GENOME;

ACTINOPTERYGII; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 28244490929     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2005.05059.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (71)

1. Alexandre, D., Clarke, J. D., Oxtoby, E., Yan, Y. L., Jowett, T., and Holder, N. 1996. Ectopic expression of Hoxa-1 in the zebrafish alters the fate of the mandibular arch neural crest and phenocopies a retinoic acid-induced phenotype. Development 122: 735-746.
2. Amores, A., et al. 1998. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711-1714.
3. Aparicio, S., et al. 2002. Whole-genome shotgun assembly and analysis of the genome of Fugu rubripes. Science 29: 1301-1310.
4. Brunet, J. F., and Ghysen, A. 1999. Deconstructing cell determination: proneural genes and neuronal identity. BioEssays 21: 313-318.
5. Chiu, C. H., et al. 2004. Bichir HoxA cluster sequence reveals surprising trends in ray-finned fish genomic evolution. Genome Res. 14: 11-17.
6. Christoffels, A., Koh, E. G., Chia, J. M., Brenner, S., Aparicio, S., and Venkatesh, B. 2004. Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 1146-1151.
7. Cutler, C. P., and Cramb, G. 2001. Molecular physiology of osmoregulation in eels and other teleosts: the role of transporter isoforms and gene duplication. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 130: 551-564.
8. DeBeer, G. 1985. The Development of the Vertebrate Skull. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. del Toro, E. D., Borday, V., Davenne, M., Neun, R., Rijli, F. M., and Champagnat, J. 2001. Generation of a novel functional neuronal circuit in Hoxal mutant mice. J. Neurosci. 21: 5637-5642.
10. Eaton, R. C., Lee, R. K., and Foreman, M. B. 2001. The Mauthner cell and other identified neurons of the brainstem escape network of fish. Prog. Neurobiol. 63: 467-485.
11. Force, A. G., Cresko, W. A., and Pickett, F. B. 2004. Information accretion, gene duplication, and the mechanisms of genetic module parcellation. In G. Schlosser and G. P. Wagner (eds.). Modularity in Development and Evolution. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 315-337.
12. Force, A., Lynch, M., Pickett, F. B., Amores, A., Yan, Y. L., and Postlethwait, J. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151: 1531-1545.
13. Friel, J. P., and Wainwright, P. C. 1997. A model system of structural duplication: homologies of adductor mandibulae muscles in tetraodontiform fishes. Syst. Biol. 46: 441-463.
14. Friel, J. P., and Wainwright, P. C. 1998. Evolution of motor patterns in tetraodontiform fishes: Does muscle duplication lead to functional diversification? Brain Behav. Evol. 52: 159-170.
15. Friel, J. P., and Wainwright, P. C. 1999. Evolution of complexity in motor patterns and jaw musculature of tetraodontiform fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 202: 867-880.
16. Furlong, R. F., and Holland, P. W. H. 2004. Polyploidy in vertebrate ancestry: Ohno and beyond. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 425-430.
17. Gehring, W. J. 2001. The genetic control of eye development and its implications for the evolution of the various eye-types. Zool. Anal. Complex Syst. 104: 171-183.
18. Gilland, E., and Baker, R. 1993. Conservation of neuroepithelial and mesodermal segments in the embryonic vertebate head. Acta Anat. 148: 110-123.
19. Goodrich, E. S. 1930. Studies on the Structure & Development of Vertebrates. Macmillan and Co. ltd, London.
20. Haldane, J. B. S. 1933. The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution. Am. Nat. 67: 5-9.
21. Hale, M. E., Kheirbek, M. A., Schriefer, J. E., and Prince, V. E. 2004. Hox gene misexpression and cell-specific lesions reveal functionality of homeotically transformed neurons. J. Neurosci. 24: 3070-3076.
22. Hoegg, S., Brinkmann, H., Taylor, J. S., and Meyer, A. 2004. Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with the diversification of teleost fish. J. Mol. Evol. 59: 190-203.
23. Holland, P. W., Garcia-Fernandez, J., Williams, N. A., and Sidow, A. 1994. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development (suppl.): 125-133.
24. Horigome, N., Myojin, M., Ueki, T., Hirano, S., Aizawa, S., and Kuratani, S. 1999. Development of cephalic neural crest cells in embryos of Lampetra japonica, with special reference to the evolution of the jaw. Dev. Biol. 207: 287-308.
25. Hughes, A. L. 1999. Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol. 48: 565-576.
26. Inoue, J. G., Miya, M., Tsukamoto, K., and Nishida, M. 2003. Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the "ancient fish." Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26: 110-120.
27. Jaillon, O., et al. 2004. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431: 946-957.
28. Janvier, P. 1996. Early Vertebrates. Clarendon Press, New York.
29. Koh, E. G., Lam, K., Christoffels, A., Erdmann, M. V., Brenner, S., and Venkatesh, B. 2003. Hox gene clusters in the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 1084-1088.
30. Kondrashov, F. A., Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., and Koonin, E. V. 2002. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. 3: research0008.1-0008.
31. Kumazawa, Y., and Nishida, M. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of osteoglossoids: a new model for Gondwanian origin and plate tectonic transportation of the Asian arowana. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17: 1869-1878.
32. Kuratani, S., Horigome, N., Ueki, T., Aizawa, S., and Hirano, S. 1998. Stereotyped axonal bundle formation and neuromeric patterns in embryos of a cyclostome, Lampetra japonica. J. Comp. Neurol. 391: 99-114.
33. Lauder, G. V. 1981. Intraspecific functional repertoires in the feeding mechanism of the characoid fishes Lebiasina, Hoplias and Chalceus. Copeia 154-168.
34. Lauder, G. V. 1982. Historical Biology and the Problem of Design. J. Theor. Biol. 97: 57-67.
35. Lauder, G. V. 1990. Functional-morphology and systematics - studying functional patterns in an historical context. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 317-340.
36. Lauder, G. V., and Schaefer, S. A. 1993. Design of the aquatic vertebrate skull: major patterns and their evolutionary interpretations. In J. Hanken and B. K. Hall (eds.). The Skull. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 113-149.
37. LeComber, S. C., and Smith, C. 2004. Polyploidy in fishes: patterns and processes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 431-442.
38. Liem, K. F. 1973. Evolutionary strategies and morphological innovations - cichlid pharyngeal jaws. Syst. Zool. 22: 425-441.
39. Liu, K. S., and Fetcho, J. R. 1999. Laser ablations reveal functional relationships of segmental hindbrain neurons in zebrafish. Neuron 23: 325-335.
40. Liu, K. S., Gray, M., Otto, S. J., Fetcho, J. R., and Beattie, C. E. 2003. Mutations in deadly seven/notchla reveal developmental plasticity in the escape response circuit. J. Neurosci. 23: 8159-8166.
41. Lumsden, A., Sprawson, N., and Graham, A. 1991. Segmental origin and migration of neural crest cells in the hindbrain region of the chick embryo. Development 113: 1281-1291.
42. Lynch, M., and Conery, J. S. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290: 1151-1155.
43. Lynch, M., and Force, A. 2000. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154: 459-473.
44. Lynch, M., and Katju, V. 2004. The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicates. Trends Genet. 20: 544-549.
45. Lynch, M., O'Hely, M., Walsh, B., and Force, A. 2001. The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate. Genetics 159: 1789-1804.
46. McClintock, J. M., Carlson, R., Mann, D. M., and Prince, V. E. 2001. Consequences of Hox gene duplication in the vertebrates: an investigation of the zebrafish Hox paralogue group 1 genes. Development 128: 2471-2484.
47. Meyer, A., and Schartl, M. 1999. Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 11: 699-704.
48. Murakami, Y., Pasqualetti, M., Takio, Y., Hirano, S., Rijli, F. M., and Kuratani, S. 2004. Segmental development of reticulospinal and branchiomotor neurons in lamprey: insights into the evolution of the vertebrate hindbrain. Development 131: 983-995.
49. Naruse, K., Tanaka, M., Mita, K., Shima, A., Postlethwait, J., and Mitani, H. 2004. A medaka gene map: the trace of ancestral vertebrate protochromosomes revealed by comparative gene mapping. Genome Res. 14: 820-828.
50. Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the World. John Wiley, New York.
51. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer-Verlag, New York.
52. Patterson, C. 1993. Osteichthyes: teleostei. In M. J. Benton, Palaeontological Association, Royal Society (Great Britain) and Linnean Society of London (eds.). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. xvii, 845.
53. Postlethwait, J., Amores, A., Cresko, W., Singer, A., and Yan, Y. L. 2004. Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome. Trends Genet. 20: 481-490.
54. Postlethwait, J. H., et al. 1998. Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat. Genet. 18: 345-349.
55. Prince, V. 2002. The Hox Paradox: more complex(es) than imagined. Dev. Biol. 249: 1-15.
56. Prince, V. E., and Pickett, F.B 2002. Splitting pairs: the diverging fates of duplicated genes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 827-837.
57. Prohaska, S. J., and Stadler, P. F. 2004. The dupliction of the Hox gene clusters in teleost fishes. Theor. Biosci. 123: 89-110.
58. Richardson, M. K., Allen, S. P., Wright, G. M., Raynaud, A., and Hanken, J. 1998. Somite number and vertebrate evolution. Development 125: 151-160.
59. Robinson-Rechavi, M., Boussau, B., and Laudet, V. 2004. Phylogenetic dating and characterization of gene duplications in vertebrates: the cartilaginous fish reference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21: 580-586.
60. Robinson-Rechavi, M., et al. 2001. Euteleost fish genomes are characterized by expansion of gene families. Genome Res. 11: 781-788.
61. Schaefer, S. A., and Lauder, G. V. 1996. Testing historical hypotheses of morphological change: biomechanical decoupling in loricarioid catfishes. Evolution 50: 1661-1675.
62. Schilling, T. F., and Kimmel, C. B. 1994. Segment and cell type lineage restrictions during pharyngeal arch development in the zebrafish embryo. Development 120: 483-494.
63. Smith, S. F., et al. 2002. Analyses of the extent of shared synteny and conserved gene orders between the genome of Fugu rubripes and human 20q. Genome Res. 12: 776-784.
64. Takezaki, N., Rzhetsky, A., and Nei, M. 1995. Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 823-833.
65. Taylor, J. S., and Raes, J. 2004. Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38: 615-643.
66. Taylor, J. S., Braasch, I., Frickey, T., Meyer, A., and Van de Peer, Y. 2003. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 13: 382-390.
67. Taylor, J. S., Van de Peer, Y., Braasch, I., and Meyer, A. 2001. Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 356: 1661-1679.
68. Van de Peer, Y., Frickey, T., Taylor, J., and Meyer, A. 2002. Dealing with saturation at the amino acid level: a case study based on anciently duplicated zebrafish genes. Gene 295: 205-211.
69. Vandepoele, K., De Vos, W., Taylor, J. S., Meyer, A., and Van de Peer, Y. 2004. Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 1638-1643.
70. Wittbrodt, J., Meyer, A., and Schartl, M. 1998. More genes in fish? BioEssays 20: 511-515.
71. Zottoli, S. J., and Faber, D. S. 2000. The Mauthner cell: What has it taught us? Neuroscientist 6: 26-38.