Content reading strategies: What teachers know, use, and want to learn

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 221-231

  Spor, Mary W ^a   Schneider, Barbara Kane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN HUNTSVILLE   (United States)

^b GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244443300     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388079909558291     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alvermann, D. E. & Phelps, S. F. (1998). Content reading and literacy. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2. Applebee, A. N. (1991). Environments for language teaching and learning: Contemporary issues and future directions. In J. Flood, J. M. Jensen, D. Lapp, & J. R. Squire (eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. New York: Macmillan.
3. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Campbell, J. R., Reese, C. M., O’Sullivan, C., & Dossey, J. A. (1996). NAEP1994 Trends in Academic Progress. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
5. Clay, M. M. (1991). Becoming literate. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
6. Cullman, B. E. (1992). Leading with literature. In B. E. Cullinan (ed.), Invitation to read: More children’s literature in the reading program. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
7. Farrell, R. T., & Cirrincione, J. M. (1984). State certification requirements for content teachers. Journal of Reading, 28, 152-158.
8. Giddings, L. R. (1990). Literature based reading instruction: A whole language perspective. Eric Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 322475.
9. Goodman, K. (1976). The reading process: A psycholinguist view. Language and thinking in schools. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.
10. Graves, M. F., Van den Brock, P., & Taylor, B. M. (1996). The first r every child’s right to read. New York: Teachers’ College, Columbia University.
11. Jurmo, P. (1994). Workplace education: Stakeholders’ expectations, practitioners’ responsibilities, and the role evaluation might play. East Brunswick, NJ: Literacy Partnerships.
12. Mazzeo, J., Allen, N. L., & Kline, D. L., (1995). Technical report of the NAEP 1994 trial state assessment program in reading. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
13. McKenna, M., & Robinson, R. (1990). Content literacy: A definition and implications. Journal of Reading, 34(3), 184-186.
14. Mullis, I. V. S., Campbell, J. R., & Farstrup, A. E. (1993). NAEP 1992 reading report card for the nations and states. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
15. Perin, D. (1994). Carving a path from job materials to a workplace skills curriculum. Adult Learning, 5, 15-17.
16. Richardson, J. S., & Morgan, R. F. (1997). Reading to learn in the content areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
17. Roe, B. D., Stoodt, B. D., & Bums, P. C. (1998). Secondary school literacy instruction the content areas. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
18. Shanahan, T., & Neuman, S. B. (1997). Literacy research that makes a difference. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(2), 202-210.
19. Shuman, R. B. (1978). A school-wide attack on reading problems. The Clearing House, 76-80.
20. United States Department of Education. (1995). Progress and plans of the National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.
21. Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. A. L. (1996). Content area reading. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers
22. Williams, P. L., Reese, C. M., Campbell, J. R., Mazzeo, J., & Phillips, G. N. (1995). 1994 NAEP reading: A first look. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.