Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 177, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1491-1496

  Körner, Markus ^a,b   Wirth, S ^a   Treitl, M ^a   Reiser, M ^a   Pfeifer, K J ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Onkologie Nussbaumstrasse   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital radiography; Radiation safety; Radiography; Technical aspects; Technology assessment; Thorax

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHORUS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIAPHRAGM; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LUNG HILUS; LUNG PARENCHYMA; MALE; MEDIASTINUM; NOISE REDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 28044467731     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858687     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. James JJ, Davies AG, Cowen AR et al. Developments in digital radiography: an equipment update. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2616-2626
2. Bernhardt TM, Otto D, Reichel G et al. Detection of simulated interstitial lung disease and catheters with selenium, storage phosphor, and film-based radiography. Radiology 1999; 213: 445-454
3. Kirchner J, Stueckle CA, Schilling EM et al. Efficacy of daily bedside chest radiography as visualized by digital luminescence radiography. Australas Radiol 2001; 45: 444-447
4. Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H et al. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography. Acta Radiol 1996; 37: 847-854
5. Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M. Storage phosphor radiography. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 58-65
6. Fasbender R, Schaetzing R. Neue CR-Technologien für die digitale Radiographie. Radiologe 2003; 43: 367-373
7. Leblans P, Struye L, Willems P. A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector. J Digit Imaging 2000; 13: 117-120
8. Illers H, Buhr E, Bergmann D et al. Measurement of the Detective. Quantum Efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray imaging devices according to the standard IEC 62220-1. Proc SPIE 2004: 177-187
9. Frankenberger J, Mair S, Herrmann C et al. Reflective and Transmissive CR ScanHead Technology on Needle Image Plates. Proc SPIE 2005: 499-510
10. Heyne JP, Merbold H, Sehner J et al. Reduktion der Strahlendosis mittels Speicherfolienradiographie im Vergleich zum konventionellen Film-Folien-System mit Rasterkassette am Schädelphantom. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1999; 171: 54-59
11. Heyne JP, Merbold H, Sehner J et al. Reduktion der Strahlendosis mittels Speicherfolienradiographie am Handphantom. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 386-390
12. Heyne JP, Sehner J, Neumann R et al. Reduktion der Strahlenexposition mittels Speicherfolienradiographie an Becken und Lendenwirbelsäule. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 104-111
13. Peer R, Lanser A, Giacomuzzi SM et al. Storage phosphor radiography of wrist fractures: a subjective comparison of image quality at varying exposure levels. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1354-1359
14. Busch HP, Busch S, Decker C et al. Bildqualität und Dosis in der Digitalen Projektionsradiographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 32-37
15. Redlich U, Reissberg S, Hoeschen C et al. Thoraxübersichtsaufnahme: ROC-Phantomstudie an vier verschiedenen digitalen und einem konventionellen Röntgenaufnahmesystem. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 38-45
16. Bacher K, Smeets P, Bonnarens K et al. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181: 923-929
17. Herrmann A, Bonel H, Stabler A et al. Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage phosphor technology in normal patients. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 385-390
18. Strotzer M, Volk M, Frund R et al. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector, image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178; 169-171
19. Volk M, Hamer OW, Feuerbach S et al. Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 827-834
20. Uffmann M, Schaefer-Prokop C, Neitzel U et al. Skeletal applications for flat-panel versus storage-phosphor radiography: effect of exposure on detection of low-contrast details. Radiology 2004; 231: 506-514
21. Aufrichtig R. Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography. Med Phys 1999; 26: 1349-1358
22. Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O et al. Vergleich von vier digitalen und einem konventionellen Röntgenaufnahmesystem für den Thorax mittels einer Patientenstudie mit nachfolgender Systemoptimierung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 272-278