Storage phosphor radiography

European Radiology

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1997, Pages

  Schaefer Prokop, C M ^a   Prokop, M ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital radiography; Storage phosphor plates

Indexed keywords

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; X-RAY INTENSIFYING SCREENS;

EID: 0002314176     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/pl00006866     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Leppert AGA, Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Galanski M (1995) Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric sereen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography. Radiology 195: 259-263
2. Vlasboem H, Schultze Kool LJ (1988) AMBER: a scanning multiple-beam equalization system for chest radiography. Radiology 169: 29-34
3. Braunschweig R, Pistitisch C, Nissen-Meyer S (1996) Digitale Radiographic Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse. Radiologe 36: 306-314
4. Peters PE, Wiesmann W (1991) Digitale Bildarchivierungs-und Kommunikationssysteme (PACS). Dtsch Ärzteblatt 88: 1432
5. Sonoda M, Takano M, Miyahara J, Kato H (1983) Computed radiography utilising scanning laser stimulated luminescence. Radiology 148: 833-838
6. Blume H, Kamiya K (1987) Autoranging and normalisation versus histogram analysis for automatic image processing of digital radiographs. Proc SPIE 767: 371-383
7. Sanada S, Doi K, Xu XW, Yin F, Giger M (1991) Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems. Med Phys 18: 414-420
8. Ikezoe J, Kohno N, Kido S et al. (1995) Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high resolution storage phosphor radiography: a preliminary study. J Digit Imag 8[Suppl]:31-6
9. Cowen AR, Workman A, Price JS. (1993) Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography. Br J Radiol 66: 332-345
10. Giger ML, Fujita H (1984) Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 1. Modulation transfer function. Med Phys 11: 287-295
11. Kamm KF. (1995) Das digitale Röntgenbild - Stand und Ausblick aus physikalisch-technischer Sicht. In: Schmidt T, Stieve FE (eds) Digitale Bildgebung in der diagnostischen Radiologie. Hoffmann, Berlin, pp 65-79
12. Müller RD, Voss M, Hirche H et al. (1996) Unsharp masking of low dosed digital luminescence radiographs: Results of a receiver operating characteristics analysis. Eur Radiol 6: 526-531
13. Prokop M, Schaefer CM, Oestmann JW, Galanski M (1993) Improved parameters for unsharp mask filtering of digital chest radiographs. Radiology 187: 521-526
14. Schaefer CM, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, et al. (1990) Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease. Radiology 174: 207-210.
15. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Llewellyn H et al. (1991) Interstitial lung disease: Impact of postprocessing in digital storage phosphor imaging. Radiology 178: 733-738
16. Ewen K, Kamm H, Richter D, Slender H ST (1995) Forderungen an digitale Bildgebungs- und Archivierungsverfahren. Akt Radiologie 5: 256-258
17. Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C (1995) Bildqualität digitaler und analoger Techniken: Durchleuchtung und Aufnahme. In: Schmidt T, Stieve FE (eds) Digitale Bildgebung in der diagnostischen Radiologie. Hoffmann, Berlin: 221-230
18. Metz C (1989) Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24: 234-245
19. Souto M, Malagari KS, Tucker D et al. (1994) Digital radiography of the chest: State of the Art. Eur Radiol 4: 281-297
20. Busch HP (1995) Digital radiography: comparison of different methods for imaging of the thorax and the gastrointestinal tracts. J Digit Imag 8[Suppl]:8-10
21. MacMahon H, Vyborny C, Sabeti V, Metz C, Dois K (1985) The effect of digital unsharp masking on the detectability of interstitial infiltrates and pneumothoraces. Proc SPIE. Medical imaging and instrumentation 555: 246-252
22. Oestmann JW, Greene RE, Rubens J et al. (1989) High frequency edge-enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines: parity between storage phosphor digital images and conventional chest images. Invest Radiol 24: 643-646
23. Elam EA, Rehm Kelly, Hillman B et al. (1991) Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax. Comparison with conventional chest radiography AJR 158: 509-514
24. Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Andresdottir A et al. (1990) Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax. Acta Radiol 31: 47-52
25. Müller RD, Hirche H, Voß M et al. (1995) ROC Analyse zur Bildnachverarbeitung digitaler Thoraxaufnahmen. RÖFO 162: 163-169
26. Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M (1996) Selenium versus storage phosphor detectors for digital chest radiography: a phantom study. Radiology 201: 45-50
27. Vuylsteke P, Schoeters E (1994) Multiscale Image Contrast Amplification, MUSICA. SPIE Medical Imaging: Image Processing 1994; vol 2167
28. Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Sommer A, Georgi M (1991) Die Wertigkeit digitaler Bildaufnahmeverfahren bei der Skelettdiagnostik. RÖFO 154: 286-291
29. Maack I, Neitzel U (1991) Optimized image processing for routine digital radiography. In: Lemke HU, Rhodes ML, Jaffe CC, Felix R (eds) Computer assisted radiology: Proceedings of the international symposium CAR. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 109-114
30. Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW et al. (1990) Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects. Radiology 177: 109-113
31. Grote R, Rapp U, Rosenthal H et al. (1992) Arthritische Veränderungen an kleinen und großen Gelenken im digitalen und konventionellen Röntgenbild. RÖFO 156: 277-281
32. Langen HJ, Klein HM, Wein B, Stargardt A, Giinther RW (1993) Comparative evaluation of digital radiography versus conventional radiography of fractured skulls. Invest Radiol 28: 686-689
33. Jennings P, Padley SP, Hansell DM (1992) Portable chest radiography in intensive care: a comparison of computed and conventional radiography. Br J Radiol 65: 852-856
34. Schaefer CM, Greene RE, Oestmann JW et al. (1989) Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging. Radiology 173: 713-716
35. Galanski M, Prokop M, Thorns E, Oestmann JW, Reichelt S, Haubitz B, Milbradt H, Gräser A, Verner L, Schaefer C (1992) Erkennbarkeit zentralvenöser Katheter bei Einsatz der digitalen Lumineszenzradiographie in der intensivmedizinischen Radiologie RÖFO 156: 68-72