Teaching reforms and the impact of paid adult support on participation and learning in mainstream schools

Support for Learning

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 147-153

  Howes, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944479594     PISSN: 02682141     EISSN: 14679604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.0268-2141.2003.00300.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. BENNETT, T., ROWE, V. and DELUCA, D. (1996) Getting to Know Abby. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 3, 183–88.
2. BLATCHFORD, P., MARTIN, C., MORIARTY, V., BASSETT, P. and GOLDSTEIN, H. (2001) Pupil Adult Ratio Differences and Educational Progress over Key Stage 1. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
3. DfES (2003a) Support Staff — Regulations and Guidance to be made under S133 of the Education Act 2002. London: DfES. Available at http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/remodelling/aprilpackage/
4. DFES (2003b) Developing the Role of School Support Staff: what the National Agreement means for you. London: DfES. Available at http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/management/remodelling/aprilpackage/
5. FRELOW, R. D., CHARRY, J. and FREILICH, B. (1974) Academic progress and behavioral changes in low achieving pupils. Journal of Educational Research, 67, 6, 263–266.
6. FRENCH, N. K. and CHOPRA, R. V. (1999) Parent Perspectives on the Roles of Paraprofessionals. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 4, 259–72.
7. GERBER, S. B., FINN, J. D., ACHILLES, C. M. and BOYD-ZAHARIAS, J. (2001) Teacher Aides and Students' Academic Achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 2, 123–144.
8. GIANGRECO, M. F., BROER, S. M. and EDELMAN, S. W. (2001) Teacher Engagement With Students With Disabilities: Differences Between Paraprofessional Service Delivery Models. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 2, 75–86.
9. GIANGRECO, M., EDELMAN, S. W., LUISELLI, T. and MACFARLAND, S. (1997) Helping or Hove ring? Effects of Instructional Assistant Proximity on Students with Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
10. HOWES, A., FARRELL, P., KAPLAN, I. and MOSS, S. (2003) The impact of paid adult support on the participation and learning of pupils in mainstream schools. (EPPI Centre Review, forthcoming.)London: EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
11. HOWES, A., FRANKHAM, J., AINSCOW, M. and FARRELL, P. (in press) The action in action research: mediating and developing inclusive intentions. Educational Action Research, 12, 2.
12. LACEY, P. (2001) The Role of Learning Support Assistants in the Inclusive Learning of Pupils with Severe and Profound Learning Difficulties. Educational Review, 53, 2, 157–67.
13. LATHER, P. (1999) To Be of Use: The Work of Reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69, 1, 2–7.
14. LOOS, F. M., WILLIAMS, K. P. and BAILEY, J. S. (1977) A multi-element analysis of the effect of teacher aides in an ‘open style’ classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 3, 437–448.
15. MARKS, S. U., SCHRADER, C. and LEVINE, M. (1999) Paraeducator Experiences in Inclusive Settings: Helping, Hovering, or Holding Their Own? Exceptional Children, 65, 315–28.
16. MONZO, L. and RUEDA, R. (2001) Sociocultural Factors in Social Relationships: Examining Latino Teachers' and Paraeducators' Interactions with Latino Students. Research Report No. 9. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451724.)
17. MOYLES, J. and SUSCHITZKY, W. (1997) Jills of All Trades: Classroom assistants in KS1 classes: Summary and Recommendations. London: University of Leicester/ATL.
18. WERTS, M. G., ZIGMOND, N. and LEEPER, D. C. (2001) Paraprofessional Proximity and Academic Engagement: Students with Disabilities in Primary Aged Classrooms. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 4, 424–440.