Assessment of project-based learning in a Mechatronics context

Journal of Technology Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 7-24

  Doppelt, Yaron ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944458923     PISSN: 10451064     EISSN: 10451064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21061/jte.v16i2.a.1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barak, M. & Doppelt, Y. (1999). Integrating the CoRT program for creative thinking into a project-based technology curriculum. Research in Science and Technological Education, 17(2), 139-151.
2. Barak, M. & Doppelt, Y. (2000). Using portfolios to enhance creative thinking. Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2), 16-24.
3. Barak, M., Eisenberg, E. & Harel, O. (1995). 'What's in the calculator?' An introductory project for technology studies. Research in Science and Technological Education, 12(2), 147-154.
4. Barak, M., & Maymon, T. (1998). Aspects of teamwork observed in a technological task in junior high schools. Journal of Technology Education, 9(2), 3-17.
5. Barak, M., Waks, S. & Doppelt, Y. (2000). Majoring in technology studies at high school and fostering learning. Learning Environment Research, 3, 135-158.
6. Barlex, D. (1994). Organising project work. In F. Banks (Ed.), Teaching Technology (pp. 124-143). London: Routledge.
7. Barlex, D. (2002, March). The relationship between science and design and technology in the secondary school curriculum in England. In I. Mottier & M. J. De Vries (Eds.), Proceedings of the PATT12 Conference (pp. 3-12).
8. Collins, A. (1991). Portfolio for biology teacher assessment. Journal of School Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5, 147-167.
9. De Bono, E. (1986). The CoRT thinking program (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
10. De Bono, E. (1996). Master Workshop of de Bono's Thinking Course. Jerusalem: Branco Weiss Institute for the Development of Thinking.
11. De Vries, M. J. (1993). Design methodology and relationships with science: Introduction. In M. J. de Vries; N. Cross; & D. P. Grant (Eds.), Design methodology and relationship with science (pp. 1-14). Boston: Kluwer
12. De Vries, M. J. (1996). Technology education: Beyond the "technology is applied science" paradigm. Journal of Technology Education, 8(1), 7-15.
13. De Vries, M. J. (1997, April). Technology assessment and the assessment of technology education. In I. Mottier and M. J. De Vries (Eds.), Proceedings of PATT8 Conference: Assessing Technology Education (pp. 373-378). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: PATT Foundation - Eindhoven University of Technology.
14. Denton, H. (1994). The Role of Group/Team Work in Design and Technology: Some Possibilities and Problems. In F. Banks. (Ed.), Teaching Technology (pp. 145-151). London: Routledge.
15. Doppelt, Y. (2000, June). Developing pupils' competencies through creative thinking in technological projects. Paper presented at the 28th Israel Conference on Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
16. Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementaton and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255-272.
17. Doppelt, Y. (2004). The impact of the characteristics of science-technology learning environment: Pupils' perceptions and gender differences, Learning Environment Research.
18. Doppelt, Y., & Armon, U. (1999, August). LEGO/Logo (Multi-Techno-Logo) as an authentic environment for improving learning skills of low-achievers, Paper presented at the Euro-Logo Conference, Sofia, Bulgaria.
19. Doppelt, Y. & Barak, M. (2002). Pupils identify key aspects and outcomes of a technological learning environment, Journal of Technology Studies, 28(1), 12-18.
20. Doppelt, Y; Mehalik, M. M., & Schunn, D. C. (2005, April). A close-knit collaboration between researchers and teachers for developing and implementing a design-based science module. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX.
21. Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research, Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4-10.
22. Gardner, P. (1997). The roots of technology and science: A philosophical and historical view. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 13-20.
23. Glaser, R. (1993). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy, & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Technology (pp. 91-111). Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley in association with The Open University.
24. Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem solving in real-life context: Alternatives for design in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8(3), 203-220.
25. Hill, A. M. & Anning, A. (2001). Comparisons and contrasts between elementary/primary 'school situated design' and 'workplace design' in Canada and England. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 11(2), 111-136.
26. Jarvinen, E. (1998). The learning environment in technology education: An experiment in a Finnish context. Journal of Technology Education, 9(2), 47-59.
27. McCormick, R. & Murphy, P. (1994). Learning the processes in technology. Paper presented to the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Oxford University, England.
28. Mioduser, D. (1998). Framework for the study of cognitive and curricular issues of technological problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 8, 167-184.
29. National Society of Professional Engineers. (1992). Engineering education issues: Report on surveys of opinions by engineering deans and employers of engineering graduates on the first professional degree (NSPE Publication No. 3059). Alexandria, VA: The author.
30. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms, Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
31. Resnick, M. & Ocko, S. (1991). LEGO/Logo: Learning through and about design, In: I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.). Constructionism (pp. 141-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
32. Seiler, G.; Tobin, K.; & Sokolic, J. (2001). Design, technology and science: Sites for learning, resistance, and social reproduction in urban schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 746-767.
33. Waks, S. (1997). Lateral thinking and technology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(4), 245-255.
34. Wolf, D. (1989). Portfolio assessment: Sampling pupil's work. Educational Leadership, 45(4), 35-39.
35. Zohar, A., & Tamir, P. (1993). Incorporating critical thinking within a regular high school biology curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(3), 136-140.