The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 43-90

  Bhatt, Rajesh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944450711     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015536226396     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Åfarli, T.: 1994, 'A Promotion Analysis of Restrictive Relative Clauses', Linguistic Review 11(1), 81-100.
2. Beck, S.: 1996, Wh-constructions and Transparent Logical Form, PhD dissertation, Universität Tubingen. Distributed as SfS-report 04-96.
3. Bhatt, R.: 1999, Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Bianchi, V.: 2000, 'The Raising Analysis of Relative Clauses: A Reply to Borsley', Linguistic Inquiry 31(1), 123-140.
5. Borsley, R. D.: 1997, 'Relative Clauses and the Theory of Phrase Structure', Linguistic Inquiry 28, 629-647.
6. Brame, M. K.: 1968, 'A New Analysis of the Relative Clause: Evidence for an Interpretive Theory', unpublished manuscript, MIT.
7. Bresnan, J. and J. Grimshaw: 1978, 'The Syntax of Free Relatives in English', Linguistic Inquiry 9(3), 331-391.
8. Carlson, G. N.: 1977, 'Amount Relatives', Language 53(3), 520-542.
9. Chomsky, N.: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
10. Chomsky, N.: 1977, 'On WA-movement', in P. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, pp. 71-132. Academic Press, New York.
11. Chomsky, N.: 1993, 'A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory', in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1-52. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
12. Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program (Studies in Linguistics 28), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
13. Chomsky, N.: 1998, Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15), MITWPL, Cambridge, Mass.
14. Cresti, D.: 2000, 'Ellipsis and Reconstruction in Relative Clauses', in Proceedings of N ELS 30, pp. 154-163. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
15. Fiengo, R. and R. May: 1994, Indices and Identity (Linguistic Inquiry Mongraphs 24), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
16. Fox, D.: 1999, 'Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains', Linguistic Inquiry 30(2), 157-196.
17. Fox, D.: 2000, Economy and Semantic Interpretation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 35), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Fox, D.: 2001, 'Antecedent Contained Deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement', Linguistic Inquiry 33, to appear.
19. Gawron, J. M.: 1996, 'Comparatives, Superlatives, and Resolution', Linguistics and Philosphy 18, 333-380.
20. Groos, A. and H. van Riemsdijk: 1979, 'Matching Effects in Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar', in A. Belled, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.), Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar: Proceedings of the 4th GLOW Conference, pp. 171-216. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.
21. Grosu, A. and F. Landman: 1998, 'Strange Relatives of the Third Kind', Natural Language Semantics 6(2), 125-170.
22. Heim, L: 1987, 'Where Does the Definiteness Restriction Apply? Evidence from the Definiteness of Variables', in E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Linguistic Representation of (In)definiteness, pp. 21-42. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
23. Heim, I.: 1992, 'Kroch, Cinque, Negative Islands,' handout from 1992 lecture, MIT.
24. Heim, L: 1995, 'Superlatives: A Case Study on the Division of Labor of Syntax and Semantics', unpublished manuscript, MIT.
25. Heycock, C.: 1995, 'Asymmetries in Reconstruction', Linguistic Inquiry 26, 547-570.
26. Iatridou, S., E. Anagnostopoulou, and R. Izvorski: 2001, 'Some Observations about the Form and Meaning of the Perfect', in M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
27. Jackendoff, R. S.: 1972, Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar (Studies in Linguistics 2), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28. Kayne, R. S.: 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 25), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
29. Kennedy, C.: 2000, 'Comparative (Sub)deletion and Ranked, Violable Constraints in Syntax', in Proceedings of NELS 30, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
30. Larson, R.: 1985, 'Bare-NP Adverbs', Linguistic Inquiry 16(4), 595-621.
31. Lebeaux, D.: 1990, 'Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation', in Proceedings of NELS 20, pp. 318-332. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
32. Lees, R. B.: 1960, The Grammar of English Nominalizations, Mouton, The Hague.
33. Lees, R. B.: 1961, 'The Constituent Structure of Noun Phrases', American Speech 36, 159-168.
34. Linebarger, M.: 1980, The Grammar of Negative Polarity, PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
35. Montague, R.: 1974, 'English as a Formal Language', in R. H. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 188-226. Yale University Press, New Haven. Originally published in 1970.
36. Munn, A.: 1994, 'A Minimalist Account of Reconstruction Asymmetries', in Proceedings of NELS 24, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
37. Partee, B.: 1975, 'Montague Grammar and Transformational Grammar', Linguistic Inquiry 6, 203-300.
38. Postal, P.: 1993, 'Remarks on Weak Crossover Effects', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 539-556.
39. Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
40. Reinhart, T. and E. Reuland: 1991, 'Anaphors and Logophors: An Argument Structure Perspective', in J. Koster and E. Reuland (eds.), Long-Distance Anaphora, pp. 282-321. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Reinhart, T. and E. Reuland: 1993, 'Reflexivity', Linguistic Inquiry 24(4), 657-720.
42. Romero, M.-L: 1997, 'The Correlation between Scope Reconstruction and Connectivity Effects', in E. Curtis, J. Lyle and G. Webster (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI, Stanford, Cal.
43. Ross, J. R.: 1964, 'A Partial Grammar of English Superlatives', unpublished MA thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
44. Ross, J. R.: 1984, 'Inner Islands', in C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, Cal.
45. Safir, K.: 1982, Syntactic Chains and the Definiteness Effect, PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
46. Safir, K.: 1999, 'Vehicle Change and Reconstruction in A'-chains', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 587-620.
47. Sauerland, U.: 1998, The Meaning of Chains, PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
48. Schachter, P.: 1973, 'Focus and Relativization', Language 49(1), 19-46.
49. Sharvit, Y.: 1999, 'Functional Relative Clauses', Linguistics and Philosophy 22(5), 447-478.
50. Stjepanovic, S.: 1998, 'Extraction of Adjuncts out of NPs', paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Indiana University.
51. Szabolsci, A.: 1986, 'Comparative Superlatives', in N. Fukui, T. R. Rapoport, and E. Sagey (eds.), Papers in Theoretical Linguistics (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8), pp. 245-265. MITWPL, Cambridge, Mass.
52. Vergnaud, J.-R.: 1974, French Relative Clauses, PhD dissertation, MIT.
53. Zlatić, L.: 1998, 'Slavic Noun Phrases are NPs, not DPs', paper presented at the Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Indiana University.