Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 157-196

  Fox, Danny ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binding theory; Chains; Copy theory of movement; Economy; Reconstruction; Scope; Semantic type shifting; Successive cyclic movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040796372     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438999554020     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aoun, Joseph. 1982. On the logical nature of the binding principles: Quantifier lowering, double raising of there and the notion empty element. In Proceedings of NELS 12, 16-36. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
2. Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1993. Syntax of scope. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
3. Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Wh-construction and transparent Logical Form. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Tübingen.
4. Beghelli, Filippo. 1993. A minimalist approach to quantifier scope. In NELS 23, 65-80. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
5. Beghelli, Filippo, and Tim Stowell. 1995. The direction of quantifier movement. Ms., UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
6. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995a. Dynamics of meaning: Anaphora, presupposition, and the theory of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995b. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In The generic book, ed. Greg N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, 176-223. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
9. Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on form and interpretation. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
11. Chomsky, Noam. 1986a. Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Chomsky, Noam. 1986b. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.
13. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays on linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Categories and transformations. In The Minimalist Program, 219-394. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
15. Chomsky, Noam, and Howard Lasnik. 1993. The theory of principles and parameters. In Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research, ed. Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld, and Theo Vennemann, 506-569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of Ā-dependencies. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
17. Cresti, Diana. 1995. Extraction and reconstruction. Natural Language Semantics 3:79-122.
18. th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 79-94. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications. [Distributed by Cambridge University Press.]
19. Engdahl, Elisabet. 1980. The syntax and semantics of questions in Swedish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
20. Engdahl, Elisabet. 1986. Constituent questions: The syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to Swedish. Dordrecht: Reidel.
21. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Fox, Danny. 1995a. Condition C effects in ACD. In MIT working papers in linguistics 27: Papers on minimalist syntax, 105-120. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
23. Fox, Danny. 1995b. Economy and scope. Natural Language Semantics 3:283-341.
24. Fox, Danny. In press. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press and MITWPL.
25. Frampton, John. 1991. Relativized Minimality: A review. The Linguistic Review 8:1-46.
26. Freidin, Robert. 1986. Fundamental issues in the theory of binding. In Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, ed. Barbara Lust, 151-188. Dordrecht: Reidel.
27. Frey, Werner. 1989. Syntaktische Bedingungen für die Interpretation. Doctoral dissertation, Universität Stuttgart.
28. Grodzinsky, Yosef, and Tanya Reinhart. 1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24:69-102.
29. Heim, Irene. 1987. Where does the definiteness restriction apply? In The representation of (in)defmiteness, ed. Eric Reuland and Alice G. B. ter Meulen, 21-42. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
30. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. Forthcoming. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Heycock, Caroline. 1995. Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry 26:547-570.
32. Higginbotham, James. 1983. Logical Form, binding, and nominals. Linguistic Inquiry 14:395-420.
33. Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form constraints and configurational structure in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
34. Hornstein, Norbert. 1995. Logical Form: From GB to Minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
36. Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 28:662-688.
37. Kitahara, Hisatsugu. 1994. Raising quantifiers without quantifier raising. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
38. Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The generic book, ed. Greg N. Carlson and Francis J. Pelletier, 125-175. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudo scope? Are there wide scope indefinites? In Events in grammar, ed. Susan Rothstein, 163-196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40. Krifka, Manfred. 1998. Scope inversion under the rise-fall contour in German. Linguistic Inquiry 29:75-112.
41. Larson, Richard, and Robert May. 1990. Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry 21:103-122.
42. Lasnik, Howard. 1972. Analyses of negation in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
43. Lasnik, Howard. 1976. Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2:1-22.
44. Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
45. Lebeaux, David. 1990. Relative clauses, licensing and the nature of the derivation. In Proceedings of NELS 20, 318-332. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
46. Lebeaux, David. 1994. Where does binding theory apply? Ms., University of Maryland, College Park.
47. Liu, Feng-Hsi. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif.
48. Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1987. Extraction from NP and the proper notion of head government. In The syntax of noun phrases, ed. Alessandra Giorgi and Giuseppe Longobardi, 57-112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. May, Robert. 1977. The grammar of quantification. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
50. May, Robert. 1985. Logical Form: Its structure and derivation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
51. McCawley, James D. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics.
53. Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface strategies. OTS, Universiteit Utrecht.
54. Riemsdijk, Henk van, and Edwin Williams. 1981. NP-Structure. The Linguistic Review 1:171-217.
55. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
56. Romero, Maribel. 1996. The (cor)relation between scope reconstruction and connectivity effects. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
57. Rooth, Mats. 1992. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, ed. Steve Berman and Arild Hestvik. (Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 29.) IBM Germany, Heidelberg.
58. Rullman, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
59. Rullman, Hotze, and Sigrid Beck. 1998. Reconstruction and the interpretation of which-phrases. In Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen Workshop, 223-256. (Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 127.) Universität Stuttgart and Universität Tübingen.
60. Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and Logical Form. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
61. Sauerland, Uli. In progress. The making and meaning of chains. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
62. Schütze, Carson. 1995. PP attachment and agreement. In MIT working papers in linguistics 26: Papers on language processing and acquisition, 95-152. MITWPL, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
63. Sharvit, Yael. 1997. The syntax and semantics of functional relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.
64. Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. A-reconstruction and constituent structure. Handout of talk given at Université du Québec à Montréal, October 1996.
65. Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 1997. Fancy binding. Ms., Universität Tübingen.
66. Tada, Hiroaki. 1993. A/A-bar partition in derivation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
67. Tancredi, Chris. 1992. Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
68. Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 8:101-139.
69. Williams, Edwin. 1985. PRO in NP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3:277-295.
70. Williams, Edwin. 1987. Implicit arguments, the binding theory, and control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 5:151-180.
71. Winter, Yoad. 1995. On the formalization of choice functions as representing the scope of indefinites. In Formal grammar, ed. Glyn V. Morrill and Richard T. Oehrle, 275-290. (Proceedings of the Conference of the European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information.) Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona.
72. Wold, Dag. 1995. Identity in ellipsis: Focal structure and phonetic deletion. Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.