Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement

Linguistic Inquiry

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 63-96

  Fox, Danny ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjunction; Antecedent contained deletion; Conservativity; Copy theory; Covert movement; Extraposition; Heavy NP shift; Late merger; Quantifier Raising; Trace Conversion

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644447309     PISSN: 00243892     EISSN: 00243892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/002438902317382189     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abe, Jun, and Hiroto Hoshi. 1999. A generalized rightward movement analysis of antecedent contained deletion. Journal of Linguistics 35:451-487.
2. Baltin, Mark. 1987. Do antecedent-contained deletions exist? Linguistic Inquiry 18:579-595.
3. Beaver, David. 1995. Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
4. Bissell, Teal. 1999. Further evidence for null pronominal variables. Master's thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz. http://www.mit.edu/ ∼bissell/NullPro.pdf
5. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1995. Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
6. Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1999. A-chains at the interface: Copies, agreement and "covert movement." Ms., McGill University, Montreal, Que.
7. Brody, Michael. 1995. Lexico-Logical Form. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Brody, Michael. 1997. Perfect chains. In Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 134-167. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Chierchia, Gennaro. 1995. Talk given at Utrecht University.
10. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1-52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
11. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. Categories and transformations. In The Minimalist Program, 219-394. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
12. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1981-82. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1:247-294.
13. Cresti, Diana. 1995. Extraction and reconstruction. Natural Language Semantics 3:79-122.
14. Cresti, Diana. 2000. Ellipsis and reconstruction in relative clauses. In NELS 30, ed. by Masako Hirotani, Andries Coetzee, Nancy Hall, and Ji-Yung Kim, 153-163. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
15. Dowty, David. 2000. The dual analysis of adjuncts/complements in Categorial Grammar. In Approaching the grammar of adjuncts, ed. by Ewald Lang, David Holsinger, Kerstin Schwabe, and Oliver Teuber, 53-78. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 17. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
16. Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
17. Fox, Danny. 1993. Chain and binding: A modification of Reinhart and Reuland's "Reflexivity." Ms., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
18. Fox, Danny. 1995. Condition C effects in ACD. In Papers on minimalist syntax, ed. by Rob Pensalfini and Hiroyuki Ura, 105-119. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
19. Fox, Danny. 1999a. Focus, parallelism and accommodation. In Proceedings of SALT 9, ed. by Tanya Matthews and Devon Strolovitch, 70-90. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
20. Fox, Danny. 1999b. Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157-196.
21. Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. Fox, Danny. In preparation. Extraposition and intensional adjectives. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
23. Fox, Danny, and Jon Nissenbaum. 1999. Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR. In WCCFL 18, ed. by Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D. Haugen, and Peter Norquest, 132-144. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.
24. Fox, Danny, and Jon Nissenbaum. In preparation. Extraposition and the nature of covert movement. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
25. Frampton, John. 1991. Relativized Minimality: A review. The Linguistic Review 8:1-46.
26. Freidin, Robert. 1986. Fundamental issues in the theory of binding. In Studies in the acquisition of anaphora, ed. by Barbara Lust, 151-188. Dordrecht: Reidel.
27. Groat, Erich, and John O'Neil. 1996. Spellout at the LF interface. In Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, ed. by Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson, and C. Jan-Wouter Zwart, 113-139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Guéron, Jacqueline, and Robert May. 1984. Extraposition and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 15:1-32.
29. Heycock, Caroline. 1995. Asymmetries in reconstruction. Linguistic Inquiry 26:547-570.
30. Heim, Irene. 1997. Predicates or formulas? Evidence from ellipsis. In Proceedings of SALT 7, ed. by Aaron Lawson and Fund Cho, 197-221. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
31. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Jacobson, Pauline. 1992. Comment flexible categorial grammar: Questions and prospects. In Formal grammar: Theory and implementation, ed. by Robert Levine, 129-167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Jacobson, Pauline. 1998. Antecedent contained deletion and pied-piping: Evidence for a variable free semantics. In Proceedings of SALT 8, ed. by Devon Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson, 74-91. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, CLC Publications.
34. Kayne, Richard S. 1976. French relative que. In Current studies in Romance linguistics, ed. by Marta Luján and Fritz Hensey, 255-299. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
35. Kayne, Richard S. 1981. Two notes on the NIC. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference, ed. by Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi, and Luigi Rizzi, 317-346. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
36. Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
37. Kayne, Richard S. 1998. Overt vs. covert movements. Syntax 1:128-191.
38. Kennedy, Christopher. 1994. Argument contained ellipsis. Linguistics Research Center report LKC-94-03, University of California, Santa Cruz.
39. Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantifiers. Linguistic Inquiry 28:662-688.
40. Kennedy, Christopher. 2000. Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Ms., Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.
41. Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In Events in grammar, ed. by Susan Rothstein, 163-196. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
42. Kuno, Susumu. 1997. Binding theory and the Minimalist Program. Ms., Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
43. Larson, Richard, and Robert May. 1990. Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry 21:103-122.
44. Lasnik, Howard. 1995. A note on pseudogapping. In Papers on minimalist syntax, ed. by Rob Pensalfini and Hiroyuki Ura, 143-164. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 27. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
45. Lasnik, Howard. 1998. Some reconstruction riddles. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, ed. by Alexis Dimitriadis, Hikyoung Lee, Christine Moisset, and Alexander Williams, 83-98. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 5.1. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.
46. Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
47. May, Robert. 1988. Ambiguities of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 19:118-135.
48. Merchant, Jason. 2000. Economy, the copy theory, and antecedent-contained deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 31:566-575.
49. Nissenbaum, Jon. 2000. Investigations of covert phrasal movement. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
50. Partee, Barbara, and Vladimir Borchev. 2000. Genitive, relational nouns, and the argument-modifier distinction. In Approaching the grammar of adjuncts, ed. by Ewald Lang, David Holsinger, Kerstin Schwabe, and Oliver Teuber, 177-201. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 17. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
51. Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax, ed. by Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky, 337-383. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press and MITWPL.
52. Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
53. Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
54. Reinhart, Tanya. 1991. Non-quantificational LF. In The Chomskyan turn, ed. by Asa Kasher, 360-384. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
55. Riemsdijk, Henk van, and Edwin Williams. 1981. NP-Structure. The Linguistic Review 1:171-217.
56. Rooth, Mats. 1992. Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, ed. by Steve Berman and Arild Hestvik. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 29. Heidelberg: IBM Germany.
57. Rullmann, Hotze, and Sigrid Beck. 1998. Reconstruction and the interpretation of which-phrases. In Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen Workshop, ed. by Graham Katz, Shin-Sook Kim, and Heike Winhart, 223-256. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 127. Universität Stuttgart and Universität Tübingen.
58. Safir, Ken. 1999. Vehicle change and reconstruction of Ā-chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30:587-620.
59. Sag, Ivan. 1976. Deletion and Logical Form. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
60. Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The making and meaning of chains. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
61. Sauerland, Uli. In preparation. A contrast to a trace. Ms., University of Tübingen.
62. Schütze, Carson T. 1995. PP attachment and agreement. In Papers on language processing and acquisition, ed. by Carson T. Schütze, Jennifer B. Ganger, and Kevin Broihier, 95-152. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MITWPL.
63. Stroik, Thomas. 1992. Adverbs and antecedent contained deletions. Linguistics 30:375-380.
64. Taraldsen, Tarald. 1981. The theoretical interpretation of a class of marked extractions. In Theory of markedness in generative grammar: Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference, ed. by Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi, and Luigi Rizzi, 475-516. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.
65. Tiedeman, Robyne. 1995. Some remarks on antecedent contained deletion. In Minimalism and linguistic theory, ed. by Shosuke Haraguchi and Michio Funaki, 67-103. Hituzi Linguistics Workshop Series 4. Japan: Hituzi Syobo.
66. Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido, and C. Jan-Wouter Zwart. 1991. Reconstruction and vehicle change. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1991, ed. by Frank Drijkoningen and Ans van Kemenade, 151-160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67. Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French relative clauses. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
68. Wilder, Chris. 1995. Antecedent containment and ellipsis. FAS Papers in Linguistics 4:132-165.
69. Wilder, Chris. 1997. Phrasal movement in LF: De re readings, VP ellipsis and binding. In NELS 27, ed. by Kiyomi Kusumoto, 425-440. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.
70. Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule ordering in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
71. Williams, Edwin. 1977. Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry 8:101-139.
72. Williams, Edwin. 1995. Ellipsis. Ms., Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.