The best bearing couple for hip arthroplasty

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 411-418

  McMinn, Derek J W ^a,b,c   Daniel, Joseph ^a,b,c   Ziaee, Hena ^c  

^a Birmingham Nuffield Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c McMinn Centre   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL; POLYETHYLENE;

AGE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CONSENSUS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISEASE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; METAL IMPLANTATION; METAL ON METAL BEARING; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; SAFETY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; REVIEW; STANDARD;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 27844554289     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588405X71090     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer, 1979.
2. Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop 1990; 258: 95-107.
3. Ring PA. Press-fit prosthesis clinical experience. In: Freeman MAR, Reynolds DA. (eds) Osteoarthritis and the Young Adult Hip: Options for Surgical Management. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1989; 220-32.
4. August AC, Aldam CH, Pynsent PB. The McKee-Farrar hip arthroplasty. A long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1986; 68: 520-7.
5. Rieker CB, Schon R, Kottig P. Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (Suppl. 3): 5-11.
6. Jin ZM, Dowson D, Fisher J. Analysis of fluid film lubrication in artificial hip joint replacements with surfaces of high elastic modulus. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 1997; 211: 247-56.
7. Barrack RL, Burak C, Skinner HB. Concerns about ceramics in THA. Clin Orthop 2004; 429: 73-9.
8. Yamamoto T, Salto M, Ueno M, Hananouchi T, Tokugawa Y, Yonenobu K. Wear analysis of retrieved ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in total hip arthroplasty: femoral head makes contact with the rim of the socket outside of the bearing surface. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 73: 301-7.
9. McMinn DJW. Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing. Hip Int 2003; 13 (Suppl 2): S41-S53.
10. Clarke MT, Lee PT, Villar RN. Dislocation after total hip replacement in relation to metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85: 650-4.
11. Long WT, Dorr LD, Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2004; 8 (Suppl. 3): 29-34.
12. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 177-84.
13. Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H. Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 185-9.
14. Visuri T, Pukkala E. Does metal-on-metal hip prosthesis have influence on cancer? A long-term follow-up study. In: Reiker C, Oberholzer S, Wyss U. (eds) World Tribology Forum in Arthroplasty. Bern: Hans Huber, 2001; 181-8.
15. Bizot P, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L. Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11-year evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 190-4.
16. Dambreville A, Phillipe M, Ray A. Zirconia ceramics or 'by night, all cats are grey'. Maîtrise Orthop 1999; 78: 1-11.
17. Malchau H, Herberts P, Söderman P, Odén A. Prognosis of Total Hip Replacement. Update and Validation of Results from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register 1979-1998. Published 2000.
18. Willmann G. Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin Orthop 2000; 379: 22-8.
19. Allain J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Delecrin J, Anract P, Migaud H, Goutallier D. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. a multi-center survivorship study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 825-30.
20. Charnley J. The long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972; 54: 61-76.
21. Lee AJC, Ling RSM, Gheduzzi S, Renfro JR. Factors affecting the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of acrylic bone cement. J Mater Sci 2002; 13: 723-33.
22. Heisel C, Silva M, Schmalzreid T. Bearing surface options for total hip replacement in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1366-79.
23. Hodgkinson JP, Maskell AP, Paul A, Wroblewski BM. Flanged acetabular components in cemented Charnley hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 464-7.
24. Wroblewski BM, Siney PD. Charnley low friction arthroplasty of the hip: long term results. Clin Orthop 1993; 292: 210-4.
25. Callaghan JJ. Chamley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five year follow up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82: 487.
26. Ling RSM. The History and Development of the Exeter Hip. Stryker Corporation, 2005.
27. Emery D, Britton A, Clarke H, Grover M. The Stanmore total hip arthroplasty; a 15-20 year follow up study. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 728-35.
28. Havelin LI, Engasaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 337-53.
29. Bulstrode CJK, Murray DW, Carr AJ. Designer hips: don't let your patient become a fashion victim. BMJ 1993; 306: 732.