Historical text comprehension reflective tutorial dialogue system

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 31-41

  Grigoriadou, Maria ^a   Tsaganou, Grammatiki ^a   Cavoura, Theodora ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

Author keywords

Dialogue based reflection; Interactive dialogue; Planning and Historical text comprehension

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844532212     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Baudet, S., & Denhière, G. (1992). Lecture Comprehension de Texte et Science Cognitive, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
2. Briton, B., & Graesser, A. (1996). Models of Understanding Text, Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bull, S. (1997). Collaborative Student Modelling in foreign language learning, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
4. Bull, S., & Nghien, T. (2002). Helping Learners to Understand Themselves with a Learner Model Open to Students, Peers and Instructors. Paper presented at the Workshop on Individual and Group modelling Methods that Help Learners Understand Themselves, June 2, 2002, San Sebastian, Spain.
5. Cavoura, T. (1994). Modalités de l' Appropriation de la Connaissance Historique, Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Paris VII, France.
6. Cavoura, T. (2000). From the Epistemology of History to its Didactics, Neusis, 9, 169-185 (in Greek).
7. Collins, A. (1987). A Sample Dialogue Based on a Theory of Inquiry Teaching. In Reigeluth C. (Ed.), Instructional Theories in Action, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 181-199.
8. Dimitrova, V. (2002). Interactive Cognitive Modeling Agents- Potentials and Challenges. In Cerri, S., Gouardères, G., & Paraguaçu, F. (Eds.), Proceedings of 6th International Conference ITS 2002 Workshop, 52-62.
9. Fletcher, C., van den Broek, P., & Arthur, E. (1996). A Model of Narrative Comprehension and Recall. In Britton, B., & Graesser, C. (Eds.), Models of Understanding Text, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 141-163.
10. Freedman, R. (2000). Plan-Based Dialogue Management in a Physics Tutor. Paper presented at the 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, April 29 - May 4, 2000, Seattle, Washington, USA.
11. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Workshop: Learner Modelling for Reflection, Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney, 238-247.
12. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: towards a cognitive science of language, inferences and consciousness, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Kay, J. (2001). Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 111-127.
14. Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1975). Comment on se rappelle et on resume des histoires, Langages, 40, 98-116.
15. Kintsch, W. (1998). Compréhension: a paradigm for cognition, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. MacLaren, B., & Koedinger, K. (2002). When and Why Does Mastery Learning Work: Instructional Experiments with ACT-R "SimStudents". Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2363, 355-366.
17. Mark, M. A., & Greer, J. (1993). Evaluation methodologies for intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 4 (2/3), 129-154.
18. Mathan, S., & Koedinger, R. (2002). An Empirical Assessment of Comprehension Fostering Features in an Intelligent System. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2363, 330-343.
19. th European ECCBR Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Case Based Reasoning, September 4, 2002, Aberdeen, Scotland.
20. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., & Mayo, M. (2002). Using Evaluation to Shape ITS Design: Results and Experiences with SQL-Tutor. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12 (2/3), 243-279.
21. Paiva, A., & Self, J. (1995). TAUGUS- A User and Learner Modeling Workbench. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197-226.
22. Ricoeur, P. (1983). Temps et recit, tome I, Editions du Seuil, Paris.
23. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Schank, R., & Cleary, C. (1994). Engines for Education, Retrieved October 25, 2005, from, http://www.engines4ed.org/hyperbook/nodes/educator- outline.html.
25. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26. Schultz, K., Bratt, E. O., Clark, B., Peters, S., Ponbarry, H., & Treeratpituk, P. (2003). A Scalable, Reusable, Conversational Tutor: SCoT. Paper presented at the AIED 2003 Workshop on Tutorial Dialogue Systems: With a View Towards the Classroom, Retrieved October 25, 2005, from, http://www.cs.usyd.edu. au/∼aied/vol6/vol6_Schultz.pdf.
27. Trabasso, T., & Van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal Thinking and the Representation of Narrative Events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 612-630.
28. Tsaganou, G., Grigoriadou, M., & Cavoura, T. (2002). Modelling Student's Comprehension of Historical Text Using Fuzzy Case-based Reasoning. Paper presented at the 6th European Workshop on Case Based Reasoning for Education and Training, September 4, 2002, Aberdeen, Scotland.
29. Tsaganou, G., Grigoriadou, M., & Cavoura, T. (2003a). Experimental Model for Learners' Cognitive Profiles of Historical Text Comprehension. International Journal of Computational Cognition, 1 (4), 31-51.
30. Tsaganou, G., Grigoriadou, M., Cavoura, T., & Koutra, D. (2003b). Evaluating an Intelligent Diagnosis System of Historical Text Comprehension. Expert Systems with Applications, 25 (4), 493-502.
31. Tsinakos, A., & Margaritis, G. (2001). Results of employing CBR in SYIM. Learning Technology, 3 (4), 41-46.
32. Turner, A., Britton, B., Andraessen, P., & McCutchen D. (1996). Predication Semantics Model of Text Comprehension and Recall. In Britton, B. & Graesser, C. (Eds.), Models of Understanding Text, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 33-71.
33. Watson, I. (1997). Applying CBR, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
34. Zapata-Riviera, D., & Greer, J. (2002). Exploring Various Guidance Mechanisms to Support Interaction with Inspectable Learner Models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2363, 442-452.
35. Zinn, C., Moore, J., & Core, M., (2002). A 3-Tier Planning Architecture for Managing Tutorial Dialogue. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2363, 574-584.
36. Zwaan, R. (1996). Toward a Model of Literary Comprehension. In Britton, B. & Graesser, C. (Eds.), Models of Understanding Text, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 241-255.