A predication semantics model of text comprehension and recall

Models of Understanding Text

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 33-71

  Turner, Althea ^a   Britton, Bruce K ^b   Andraessen, Paul ^d   McCutchen, Deborah ^c  

^a VERIZON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85128606865     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Alterman, R. (1985). A dictionary based on concept coherence. Artificial Intelligence, 25, 153-186.
2. Britton, B. K., & Gulgoz, S. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329-345.
3. Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1983). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 26, 421-436.
4. Britton, B. K., Van Dusen, L., Glynn, S. M., & Hemphill, D. (1990). The impact of inferences on instructional text. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 53-70). New York: Academic Press.
5. Dahlgren, K. (1988). Naive semantics for natural language understanding. Boston: Kluwer.
6. de Beaugrande, R. (1980). Text, discourse, and process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach and R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals of linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8. Fletcher, C. R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 43-58.
9. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGrawHill.
10. Graesser, A. C., & Clark, L. F. (1985). The structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Gruber, J. (1965). Studies in lexical relations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
12. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Kieras, D. E. (1989). An advanced computerized aid for the writing of comprehensible technical documents. In B. Britton & S. Glynn (Eds.), Computer writing environments: Theory, research and design (pp. 143-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13-28.
15. Kieras, D. E. (1989). An advanced computerized aid for the writing of comprehensible technical documents. In B. Britton, & S. Glynn (Eds.), Computer writing environments: Theory, research and design (pp. 143-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
17. Kintsch, W., & Keenan, J. M. (1973). Reading rate as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274.
18. Kintsch, W., Kozminsky, E., Streby, W. J., McKoon, G., & Keenan, J. M. (1975). Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 196-214.
19. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
20. Lesgold, A. M., Roth, S. F., & Curtis, M. E. (1979). Foregrounding effects in discourse comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 291-308.
21. Magliano, J. P., Graesser, A. C., Eymard, L. A., Haberlandt, K., & Gholson, B. (1993). Locus of interpretive and inference processes during text comprehension: A comparison of gaze durations and word reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 19, 704-709.
22. Mandler, J. M. (1978). A code in the node: The use of the story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1, 14-35.
23. Mandler, J. M., & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 111-151.
24. Manelis, L., & Yekovich, F. R. (1976). Repetition of propositional arguments in sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 301-312.
25. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
26. Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. (1990). Five papers on WordNet (CSL Report 43). Princeton, NJ: Cognitive Science Laboratory.
27. Miller, J. R., & Kintsch, W. (1980). Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 335-354.
28. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1978). Priming in item recognition: Evidence for the propositional structure of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 403-418.
29. Reiger, C. (1975). Conceptual analysis. In R. C. Schank (Ed.), Conceptual information processing (pp. 157-288). Amsterdam, North Holland.
30. Spilich, G. J., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Text processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275-290.
31. Turner, A. A. (1987). The propositional analysis system, version 1.0 (Tech. Rep. No. 87-02). Boulder: University of Colorado, Institute of Cognitive Science.
32. Turner, A., & Greene, E. (1978). Construction and use of a propositional text base. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalogue of selected documents in psychology (MS 1713).
33. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.