The ground dominance effect in the perception of 3-D layout

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 802-815

  Bian, Zheng ^a   Braunstein, Myron L ^a   Andersen, George J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844469069     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193534     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. ALHAZEN, I. (1989). Book of optics. In A. I. Sabra (Trans.), The optics of Ibn-Haytham (Vol. 1). London: University of London, Warburg Institute.
2. ANDERSEN, G. J., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & SAIDPOUR, A. S. (1998). The perception of depth and slant from texture in three-dimensional scenes. Perception, 27, 1087-1106.
3. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1968). Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 247-253.
4. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSEN, G. J. (1981). Velocity gradients and relative depth perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 145-155.
5. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & PAYNE, J. W. (1968). Perspective and the rotating trapezoid. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 58, 399-403.
6. EPSTEIN, W. (1966). Perceived depth as a function of relative height under three background conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 335-338.
7. FERIA, C. S., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSEN, G. J. (2003). Judging distance across texture discontinuities. Perception, 32, 1423-1440.
8. GIBSON, J. J. (1946). Perception of distance and space in the open air. In J. J. Gibson (Ed.), Motion picture testing and research (Army Air Force Aviation Psychology Program Res. Rep. No. 7).
9. [Reprinted in D. C. Beardslee & M. Wertheimer (Eds.) (1958), Readings in perception. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.]
10. GIBSON, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
11. GIBSON, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
12. GILLAM, B., FLAGG, T., & FINLAY, D. (1984). Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 559-564.
13. GYSEN, V., VERFAILLIE, K., & DE GRAEF, P. (2002). Transsaccadic perception of translating objects: Effects of landmark objects and visual field position. Vision Research, 42, 1785-1796.
14. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
15. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994a). Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three-dimensional distance. Nature, 367, 173-175.
16. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994b). Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering. Vision Research, 34, 151-162.
17. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1995). Visual attention to surfaces in 3-D space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 11155-11159.
18. MCCARLEY, J. S., & HE, Z. J. (2000). Asymmetry in 3-D perceptual organization: Ground-like surface superior to ceiling-like surface. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 540-549.
19. MENG, J. C., & SEDGWICK, H. A. (2001). Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1-15.
20. MENG, J. C., & SEDGWICK, H. A. (2002). Distance perception across spatial discontinuities. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1-14.
21. NAKAYAMA, K., HE, Z. J., & SHIMOJO, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. NORMAN, J. F., & TODD, J. T. (1998). Stereoscopic discrimination of interval and ordinal depth relations on smooth surfaces and in empty space. Perception, 27, 257-272.
23. ROGERS, B., & GRAHAM, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
24. SEDGWICK, H. A. (1983). Environment-centered representation of spatial layout: Available visual information from texture and perspective. In J. Beck, B. Hope, & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 425-458). New York: Academic Press.
25. SEDGWICK, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 211 to 2157). New York: Wiley.
26. SHEPARD, R. N., & METZLER J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
27. SINAI, M. J., OOI, T. L., & HE, Z. J. (1998). Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance. Nature, 395, 497-500.
28. STEVENS, K. A. (1981). The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence, 217, 47-74.
29. TITTLE, J. S., NORMAN, J. F., PEROTTI, V. J., & PHILLIPS, F. (1998). The perception of scale-dependent and scale-independent surface structure from binocular disparity, texture, and shading. Perception, 27, 147-166.
30. TODD, J. T., & AKERSTROM, R. A. (1987). Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 242-255.
31. TURNER, J., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSEN, G. J. (1997). Relationship between binocular disparity and motion parallax in surface detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 370-380.
32. VECERA, S. P. (2004). The reference frame of figure-ground assignment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 909-915.
33. VECERA, S. P., VOGEL, E. K., & WOODMAN, G. F. (2002). Lower region: A new cue for figure-ground assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 194-205.