Relationship between binocular disparity and motion parallax in surface detection

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 370-380

  Turner, Jessica ^a   Braunstein, Myron L ^a   Andersen, George J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 0031110130     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211904     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ANDERSEN, G. J. (1996). Detection of smooth three-dimensional surfaces from optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 945-957.
2. ANDERSEN, G. J., & WUESTEFELD, A. P. (1993). Detection of three-dimensional surfaces from optic flow: The effects of noise. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 321-333.
3. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1994). Structure from motion. In A. T. Smith & R. J. Snowden (Eds.), Visual detection of motion (pp. 367-393). New York: Academic Press.
4. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., ANDERSEN, G. J., ROUSE, M. W., & TITTLE, J. S. (1986). Recovering viewer-centered depth from disparity, occlusion, and velocity gradients. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 216-224.
5. BÜLTHOFF, H., & MALLOT, H. (1988). Integration of depth modules: Stereo and shading. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 5, 1749-1758.
6. CORNILLEAU-PÉRÈs, V., & DROULEZ, J. (1993). Stereo-motion cooperation and the use of motion disparity in the visual perception of 3-D structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 223-239.
7. CUTTING, J. E., & VISHTON, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. J. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 5. Perception of space and motion (2nd ed., pp. 69-117). San Diego: Academic Press.
8. JOHNSTON, E. B., CUMMING, B. G., & LANDY, M. S. (1994). Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Research, 34, 2259-2275.
9. KOENDERINK, J. J. (1990). The brain as a geometry engine [In special issue, Domains of mental functioning: Attempts at a synthesis]. Psychological Research, 52, 122-127.
10. LANDY, M. S., MALONEY, L. T., JOHNSTON, E. B., & YOUNG, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
11. NORMAN, J. F., & TODD, J. T. (1995). The perception of 3-D structure from contradictory optical patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 826-834.
12. RICHARDS, W. (1985). Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2, 343-349.
13. ROGERS, B. J., & COLLETT, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41 A, 697-717.
14. ROGERS, B., & GRAHAM, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
15. ROUSE, M. W., TITTLE, J. S., & BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1989). Stereoscopic depth perception by static stereo-deficient observers in dynamic displays with constant and changing disparity. Optometry & Vision Science, 66, 355-362.
16. TITTLE, J. S., & BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1993). Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 157-169.
17. TITTLE, J. S., PEROTTI, V. J., & PHILLIPS, F. (1995). The integration of surface shape and curvedness from motion and binocular stereopsis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36, S847.
18. TURNER, J., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSEN, G. J. (1995). Detection of surfaces in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 809-821.
19. UTTAL, W. R. (1985). The detection of nonplanar surfaces in visual space. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.