Distance perception across spatial discontinuities

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-14

  Meng, J C ^a   Sedgwick, H A ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036366718     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194553     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ALHAZEN, I. (1989). Book of optics. In The optics of Ibn-Haytham (A. I. Sabra, Trans.). London: Warburg Institute, University of London. (Alhazen lived approximately 965-1040 C.E.; when he wrote this work is not known.)
2. BROOKES, A., & STEVENS, K. A. (1989). Binocular depth from surfaces versus volumes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 479-484.
3. GIBSON, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
4. GILLAM, B., & SEDGWICK, H. A. (1996). The interaction of stereopsis and perspective in the perception of depth. Perception, 25 (Suppl.), 70.
5. GLENNERSTER, A., & MCKEE, S. P. (1999). Bias and sensitivity of stereo judgements in the presence of a slanted reference plane. Vision Research, 39, 3057-3069.
6. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
7. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three-dimensional distance. Nature, 367, 173-175.
8. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1995). Visual attention to surfaces in 3-D space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 11155-11159.
9. LOOMIS, J. M., & PHILBECK, J. W. (1999). Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 397-402.
10. MENG, J. C., & SEDGWICK, H. A. (2001). Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1-15.
11. NAKAYAMA, K., HE, Z. J., & SHIMOJO, S. (1995). Visual surface representation: A critical link between lower-level and higher-level vision. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. N. Osherson (Eds.), Visual cognition: An invitation to cognitive science (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1-71). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. ROCK, I., & EBENHOLTZ, S. (1959). The relational determination of perceived size. Psychological Review, 66, 387-401.
13. SAUER, C. W., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & ANDERSON, G. J. (1999). Judging the depth separation of objects in uniform connected regions in 3D scenes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 40, S415.
14. SEDGWICK, H. A. (1987). Layout2: A production system modeling visual perspective information. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 662-666). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.
15. SEDGWICK, H. A. (1989). Combining multiple forms of visual information to specify contact relations in spatial layout. In P. S. Schenker (Ed.), Sensor fusion II: Human and machine strategies (SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 1,198, pp. 447-458). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
16. SEDGWICK, H. A. (2001). Visual space perception. In E. B. Goldstein (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of perception (pp. 128-167). Oxford: Blackwell.
17. SINAI, M. J., OOI, T. L., & HE, Z. J. (1998). Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance. Nature, 395, 497-500.
18. WHITNEY, D., & CAVANAGH, P. (2000). Motion distorts visual space: Shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 41, S741.
19. WILCOX, L. M., CHODIRKER L., &, BRAY, B. (2000). Stereoscopic surface interpolation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Science, 41, S735.